208
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 80 points 1 month ago

Despite spending a lifetime living with this reality, it still seems so fucking wild to me that one of the two major political parties in this country is just entirely peopled with assholes. It's like they have a secret competition amongst themselves to see who is the biggest bag of dicks.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

The thing I don't get is who wakes up in the morning and goes to work for those assholes? I hate to say it, but I think they might be assholes too. I'm starting to worry it might be assholes all the way down.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Oh, it 100% is. If being a total fuck knuckle didn't consistently get them like ~50% of the national vote, Republicans would pivot. But they've realized that the worse they are, the more votes they can squeeze out of the hateful pieces of shit who infect us like a cancer.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

What about the people that vote for these asshats?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

a mixed group. assholes among them, sure. But also the mentally deficient and weak willed. Those who are easily swayed by rage and propaganda. People who are under-educated and imbalanced.

That's a big overlap with assholes and hats, yes, but not just assholes.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Representative democracy representing huge parts of the population. People are as always a disappointment.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Who said anything about people? We're talking about conservatives (AKA racist, homophobic, misogynist bigots).

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, places with huge tracts of land, with few people, but a majority of cons, gets an outsized say in things, too.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

"she's rich, she's beautiful, she's got huge.... tracks of land!*

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPX-mW4l1rU

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

She will do what with a bag of dicks?

(no Lindsay, sit down. Don't get excited now...)

[-] [email protected] 67 points 1 month ago

Republican candidate for Missouri Secretary of State Valentina Gomez – who rages at all things “weak and gay”

So much Boomer energy. Too bad it can't be used for anything other than hate.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

If anything, it seems more Greatest Generation energy, but that's harder to say.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago

Valentina Gomez called Griner an "unpatriotic lesbian."

because, according to the MAGAts, the latter is the cause of the former.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

Not only is she a piece of shit homophobe, she’s yet another person who watched one season of women’s college basketball, has not paid attention to the WNBA at all, and is suddenly an expert on the players in the WNBA.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Mostly off topic, but I do appreciate that Caitlin Clark has made a lot of people actually care about one women's sport that previously only pretended to care for the sake of being nasty to trans people.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

I saw a comment on that bastion of reasonable well thought out dialogue, Yahoo, that asserted if Caitlyn Clark were black, she'd be on the team.

To this I questioned where on the roster Angel Reese resides.

The US team is on a streak of what, seven or eight gold medals? I'll leave it to their organizers as to whom they would like to play.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

People think the Olympics is about them. It's not. People even think the Olympics is about countries and its not that either. It's about human athletic endeavor, or how a person can push themselves through training and dedication.

Therefore, the most important opinion should come from the person themselves. What did Caitlyn Clark say? She said she didn't mind at all, and it gave her a goal for the future. In addition, she said in effect, "go team". Why? Because obviously the young woman knows about sportsmanship and has a lot of class.

This is unlike those that try for whatever reason who project themselves into her shoes. Shoes that would never fit them. Hell, I'll say it...they couldn't carry her jock strap. That woman can throw dimes from the logo all day,

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

People think the Olympics is about athletics. It's not. It's about corporate sponsors and construction contracts.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago

It’s weird to call Brittney Griner “weak and gay” when she’s clearly very strong and gay.

Also, basically no rookie should be on the Olympic Squad. For one thing, the Team USA minicamp (or whatever it’s called) is during the NCAA Tournament so they miss that. Then, because the calendars aren’t aligned, they get basically no off-season to recover before the WNBA season starts. She probably doesn’t need another tournament to play in in 2024.

Caitlin Clark is better off being a rookie, learning to play physical basketball against grown ass women, and making her Olympic debut at the Los Angeles games. Every conservative dipshit can cry tears of pure racist joy when she wins a gold medal against France or whomever.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Also, I'm an LSU fan who doesn't even root for Caitlin Clark. I bet on South Carolina in the final because I thought it'd be funny if she lost to a second SEC team. It's absurd that a hater like me has to be the one saying, "Be patient, let her develop, get enough rest, and she maybe can be the best ever."

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

This is your face on GOP!

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Modem sound

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

This looks like a screenshot of a very badly animated AI.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

This is probably an unpopular take but I still feel like trading "The Lord of War" international arms dealer for a wnba player feels like we left a lot behind on the table of that particular deal.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Yo bitch your dog whistle is actually just a regular whistle

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, okay. Send an American back to a Russia run by a dictator. The GOP version of "patriotic".

Also, something something lesbian. I think the woman doth protest too much.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

100% self hating lesbian.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

This is a completely normal position to advocate. /s

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I think I have to say this carefully.

As a member of two protected DEI classes, Ms Gomez may want to go lightly on the "those people" talk.

I hope she realizes her status now is only after a hard-fought battle that is still going on, and she's on the wrong side.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

No taksie backsie

Russia, probably

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

That underbite though, what a mouth breather lol

this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
208 points (96.0% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3684 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS