this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
50 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13394 readers
936 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So, I've decided to not look into this at all, but my understanding is that you're scored by like, size and weight of the best fish or added up fish total by the end of some fishing time limit. So like...isn't this mostly up to the fish? This meta feels VERY rng driven and hardly suitable to competitive play. im-vegan , but it came to kind and I'm curious how the fuck anyone gets credit here. If anything it should be whoever can catch any fish first.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

one thing that really fucks me up about fishing today is that fish were much larger (and older) back in the day. even shellfish were big as fuck; oysters were the size of steaks. and these days the fish are so much smaller, even the Tuna. it takes a long long time to grow a 1400lb Tuna...

cw: seafood for links in this post

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This was because they actually had a chance to grow. There wasn't much demand for oysters before we had the technology to can them or ship them by train.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

100% it's the same shit with forests you gotta give things fucking time to grow

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They had Krakens and Leviathans and Cthulhus way back. Fisherman were zany. Imagine reeling in Poseidon.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

"oh hey Poseidon, sorry about that. Actually before I catch and release ya, a little birdie told me Laomedon wasn't planning on skipping out on your fee for that little construction job you did.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Holy shit, that's what Cracked.com looks like now? It looks like any generic buzzfeed ripoff with 0 soul or personality. I'm surprised it's still around.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

more surprising that they're putting out articles in 2024

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

Different size fish hang out in somewhat different parts of the lake, and eat different things. You can use a physically larger lure to prevent yourself from catching small fish (but might catch nothing). Knowing what fish are biting when and where for the given time of year and day and weather is a skill.

But honestly I think it's mostly cheating.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I don’t know but they had the most unhinged cheating scandal in competitive sports ever. The top fisher was found to be cheating by putting lead weights into his catches.

The video of when they were caught is extremely worth watching (CW: dead fish)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

as soon as I saw "competitive fishing" in the title, I thought of this video and hoped someone would post it

Iirc, that dude had been on a winning streak, which is why this was a Big Fucking Deal to all the onlookers in the video.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

damn cheating CHinese, wait

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Didn't these guys get a jail sentence for cheating at a fishing game?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Did they?? I had stopped following. But iirc they basically defrauded the competitions out of hundreds of thousands of dollars of prizes

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

idk its fun lemme just like throw a hook in the water and go eepy in my girlchair

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Poker has quite a bit of random chance in it too and it's also very successful for competitions

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Poker isn't entirely chance and there's calculated risk. Not guessing what's under the water you're casting at is alive and big but also hungry

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah and there's different lures and baits and fishing tactics too

Not trying to defend the integrity of a sport centered around harming and terrifying animals for fun, just saying there are factors the fisherman can affect

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sure but poker pits the players against each other, not animals just doing their thing. Though in both cases the fish are gonna get their shit rocked

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fish plays worst hand of poker ever, asked to leave lake/casino

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

"GG lads, I win this round"

plays hand consisting exclusively of the two of clubs

"Please leave"

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

I have a modest proposal for this issue: People​ ​who harm animals as a hobby can please gargle my nuts.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Struggle session: is catch and release vegan haram?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're just torturing the fish.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's inverse waterboarding by any other name, this isn't really ambiguous.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It is ambiguous because fish are not humans. You are anthropomorphizing the experience of the fish.

That being said, I do not fish and it appears very cruel.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

you stab the fish in the mouth, forcefully pull them out of their oxygenated environment, do a little dance with them or whyever you decided this would be "fun" and then mercifully let them go instead of killing them

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Yea that's about right lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

They can't really remember being caught a lot of the time (depends on the species). You can catch the same fish on the same lure in a short timespan which indicates they either don't remember the lure or they don't have a lasting negative sensation from being caught.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

why are you arguing with me bro what'd i do

i just say it was beginning i didn't sign up for participation

edit: but fr why'd you fire that off with me I was just waiting for the fun to start lay off me dude

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I've noticed issues here and elsewhere eith me being excessively confrontational.

I'm not sure how I can stop being so tightly wound, but it's clear to me that you deserve an apology.

I am sorry.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

It's on the level of golfing as a bourgeois "sport" imo

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

i don't fish and couldn't imagine being invested in it as a competition, but i think the notion is that bigger fish are older and have more guile from being longer lived.

personally, i don't need an excuse or an invitation to sit on the side of a waterbody and zone out.