this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
136 points (96.6% liked)

politics

18973 readers
3080 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Wow. Elections really bring out the nation's most disgusting, deplorable, degenerates.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wait until you see the candidates!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I really wanna go back to when if a candidate went 'yeeeeah' in too weird a voice we all just dropped them out of the running.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

They're like national-level county fairs that way.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago (3 children)

"I didn't eat that dog and assault that nanny, but if I did the brain worms made me do it - I'm not a church boy!"

This was the full quote for those of you who didn't read the article.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Actual quote:

The Vanity Fair article also features Eliza Cooney, a former part-time babysitter who worked for Kennedy between 1998 and 1999, alleging that he groped her in his kitchen. Kennedy declined to directly acknowledge the sexual assault accusation at first, instead dismissing “the other allegations” as part of a “very, very rambunctious youth.”

“I’ve said this from the beginning. I am not a church boy. I am not running like that. I said … I had a very, very rambunctious youth. I said in my announcement speech that I have … so many skeletons in my closet, that if they could all vote, I could run for king of the world,” Kennedy said, adding, “Vanity Fair is recycling 30-year-old stories, and I, you know, am not gonna comment on the details of any of them.”

When asked directly whether he denied sexually assaulting Cooney, Kennedy repeated, “I’m not going to comment on it.”

This comes right after he directly and at length denied the allegations that he ate part of a dog.

Also, this part of his very, very rambunctious youth happened (allegedly) when he was 45 and had several children.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Saying "I had a rambunctious childhood" and "I've got so many skeletons in my closet" like it absolves him from anything...

"Yeah, I strangled that hooker while high on coke and while getting blown by that other hooker. So what? Why are you surprised? I told you I had a rambunctious childhood!"

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

That's par for the course. Trump's "locker room talk" about the joys of sexual assault happened when he was in his 60's, but they still hand waved it away as if it was a minor transgression by a teenager.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Did you sexually assualt that poor woman?

"I'm no church boy"

That's a REALLY bad answer.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He was just an excitable boy!

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (2 children)

When a brain wormed, dog eating, sexual assaulter isn't even the worst candidate in the election your know you're in America baby.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

its like the aliens have spliced together every shitty story plot we have ever broadcast on television and are now playing it back for us in our heads.

what. the. actual. fuck.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Cries in Venezuelan.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

“He ate out a dog. It's a big difference.”

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

c/[email protected] is leaking

(Edit: did I link that correctly?)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The supposed dog eating would have been the same year as the supposed brain worm.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I wonder if you can get that brain worm from eating dog…

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I know it's RFK and he's a bit of a wacko. But, you gotta wonder how far are magazines going to go to bait people into reading their articles to get clicks and advertisement money. RFK seems a bit of an easy target for that.

The sexual assault allegations don't surprise me, but the dog eating part?

I think some of these statements have to be taken with a grain of salt.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

For context, there’s a picture of him miming biting into a roasted dog that he sent someone with a note that he could recommend a good restaurant for dog meat. It’s not just a random speculation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He could've been joking. Doesn't mean anything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

That’s what he’s saying about it now, but it’s a reasonable question to ask at least.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

This is a story about a story, but I've got to admit that's one hell of a headline

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

It seems like there is a maximum level of failsons an empire can accumulate before it collapses.

RFK Jr is a third wave failson. Trump is a second wave failson.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

So it was a goat carcass then?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I know this sounds really weird to say but ....2 different events?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Umm... what

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yep…. This is where we are now. Presidential candidates that have to clear themselves of having been accused of eating dogs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I mean, why not put all that good meat to waste after you shoot them?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I miss the goofy man with big ears and graphs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has denied allegations made in a new Vanity Fair report that he had previously eaten a dog while sidestepping accusations of sexual assault levied by a former nanny in the magazine, saying, “I’m not a church boy.”

In an interview with the “Breaking Points” political podcast released Tuesday, Kennedy called the Vanity Fair article “a lot of garbage” but acknowledged that his past included “many skeletons in my closet.”

The article alleges that Kennedy texted a message to a friend last year that included a photograph that showed him pantomiming eating a cooked animal carcass.

I said in my announcement speech that I have … so many skeletons in my closet, that if they could all vote, I could run for king of the world,” Kennedy said, adding, “Vanity Fair is recycling 30-year-old stories, and I, you know, am not gonna comment on the details of any of them.”

I’ll keep talking about the fact that working families can’t afford houses or groceries because our last two presidents went on a $14 trillion debt joyride, paid for by hard-working Americans.”

The accusations made in the Vanity Fair article come at a trying time for Kennedy’s campaign as he seeks to expand his support across the country for his independent presidential bid.


The original article contains 716 words, the summary contains 218 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!