…WHAT’S THIS?! IT’S BIDEN FROM THE TOP ROPE!
NOT SURE WHO TOOK THE BRUNT OF THAT ONE!
HE'S GOING FOR THE FOLDING CHAIR!
SLAM!
Dup duh duh, dup duh duh, Let the boys be boys!
Damn you, you beat me to it. And i was thinking I'm all clever and shit.
RAM JAM!
WHO-OA BLACK BETTY!
BAMALAM
RAM ~~JAM~~ RANCH!
FTFY
MAH GAWD THAT MAN HAS A FAMILY…WHO LIKELY HATES HIM!
BAW GHAWD
"Project 2025 should scare every single American," Biden said. "It would give Trump limitless power over our daily lives and let him use the presidency to enact 'revenge' on his enemies, ban abortion nationwide and punish women who have an abortion, and gut the checks and balances that make America the greatest democracy in the world."
Remember less than 24 hours ago Biden said he wouldn't really care if trump won as long as Biden felt he "tried his best"?
Logical consistency is a big deal for Dem voters but Biden and the DNC keeps wanting to treat us like Republican voters who have the memory of goldfish and zero standards.
It’s pretty goddamn baffling and more than a little bit infuriating, to be honest
Perhaps I'm mis-remembering account names, but it seems like every comment from you is trying to undermine progressive votes.
Yes givesomefucks is a propaganda account. You can downvote and move on.
I feel being willing to admit there is a severe problem is a bit more important than remaining consistent. Now if he goes back to saying, "So long as I did my best, then no regrets"...
Go back to saying that?
When has he tried to take it back?
It's still out there because he meant it.
They're both true statement.
Biden probably doesn't remember saying that, to be fair.
SLAMS!
🎵duhduh duh Let the boys be boys!🎶
SLAMMMMMMM-AH
Sure thing, donny dipshit!
I’m interested in the sourcing of this image.
What are the page numbers referring to? If they’re referring to a document for Agenda 47, I have not found any such document. If they’re referring to the official Project 2025 policy mandate that I found here, then I don’t think the page numbers match up for at least some of the points raised.
Also, is there an original image without the page numbers, and if so where did that come from?
Tbh I suspect that this image contains misinformation, which would be a real bummer. I know at least that the pdf I linked already says some crazy stuff, not the least of which is suggesting an abortion ban, but it’s 922 pages so there’s a LOT of pointless fluff.
Edit, 922 pages, not 923.
Edit: I received a couple downvotes but no direct responses. Is that just bc I’m coming off as someone who’s defending Project 2025, or bc I’m lame for asking about sources and/or sweating the details, or some other thing?
I'd like to see him actually physically slam his desk without wincing in pain or fainting.
I'd also like to slam every writer and author who continue to use the word "slam" over the head with a rolled up newspaper containing their article
After that watching that debate I doubt Biden is capable of slamming anything. But yeah fuck Trump.
How much money do we need to collect to watch politicians actually slam each other?
I'm pretty sure they ousted Madison Cawthorn for describing exactly this...
I’m not sure what that would look like, and I’m even less sure I want to find out
Yeah, if we're gonna go full Idiocracy, let's let the politicians start the first season of "Ow my balls!".
You mean like when Trump got slammed in the WWE?
Did he SLAM him good?!?!?
Breaking Bombshell News Biden Slams some sort of moldy fruit...an old pumpkin maybe? BREAKING BOMBSHELL SLAM NEWS CONCLUDED!!
I’d rather watch Biden pound Trump.
Username checks out
Gross...
I'd rather pound Trump while Biden watches
OH, slam. That will teach him. 🤔
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News