15
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/2934489

CNN — AI images have become an unavoidable roadside attraction on Facebook and other social media, where dramatic and outlandish depictions of emotional scenes lure users into doling out likes, shares and “Amens.”

Among the funhouse images of fake children crying in the street and police officers saving inexplicably huge Bibles from the rain, countless depictions of Jesus Christ seem to take up an outsized amount of AI real estate.

It makes sense. The central figure of Christianity invokes potent reactions from billions of followers around the globe. For the last 2,000 years, faithful hands have labored to create likenesses of their professed savior, projecting onto him various theologies and mythologies combined with aesthetics of the time: Jesus suffering on the cross, Jesus as the Good Shepherd, Jesus the creator of miracles, Jesus the word made flesh, Jesus as cosmic judge.

Now, in the age of AI, Jesus can assume an infinite variety of roles with just a few keystrokes. Jesus as a durian fruit, for instance. Or Jesus battling shirtless with Satan. Sometimes, Jesus is cuddling a person in need in a hospital bed, his chiseled features and strong hands providing divine comfort.

None of these things are in the Bible, but they are alive in the minds of particularly imaginative Christians, or just those who want some easy engagement on Facebook.

What’s unsettling is how many AI-created images of Jesus are unnecessarily handsome and rugged, like one of those Instagram influencers who wears a lot of pendants and is always wandering barefoot through an island jungle.

There’s nothing wrong with that, per se. The Bible doesn’t get specific about Jesus’ looks, and certainly artists over the millennia have taken creative license when it comes to his physique (and, to a different point, his skin tone).

However, generative AI, like the kind that can create images from text prompts, doesn’t work like an artist’s brain. All of these handsome AI Jesus images are created from patterns a machine picks up from the information it is fed. What does that say about us, and how we view the figures most important to our cultural identities?

wasn't there c/the_dunk_tank posts about this lmao

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Muscular Jesus was a thing long before AI, i seen such pics for as long as i'm in the internet. And even longer, some of the legit church painters seemed to have urges in this direction.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

If the Jesus statue in a church isn’t rippling and sexy I’m not interested

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

ourselves

Fuck off CNN, don't include me in your capitalist hivemind

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Among the funhouse images of fake children crying in the street and police officers saving inexplicably huge Bibles from the rain, countless depictions of Jesus Christ seem to take up an outsized amount of AI real estate.

had to see the huge Bibles…

lol

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

That's the Poly bible, a guide to maintaining healthy polyamorous relationships.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

gotta save the inexplicably huge books from the rain ig? lol

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

"Jesus was Black, Ronald Reagan was the devil, and the government is lying to you about 9/11." -- Huey Freeman

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

well this makes the "Jesus is a white man" idea a whole lot harder to dispel if a tool for mass creating images won't do otherwise

algorithmic bias is a pretty huge issue with AI in general. not looking too good for BIPOC either

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

The iconoclasts were correct.

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
15 points (94.1% liked)

news

23266 readers
808 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS