this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
37 points (83.6% liked)

politics

18645 readers
3721 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Tip #1, bring a lot of strong alcohol.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Every time he says "Look..." take a shot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Slam 4 shots if he says he'll 'beat Trump in 2020' again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Every politico and pundit does that and I want to do an Elvis on my TV every time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Beer bongs and crack pipes.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Ok so what’s the drinking game this time

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

Crippling depression and anxiety. The greatest drinking game of all.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Finish the bottle as fast as you can

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

😆😆😆🥲😢😢😭😭😭😖😞🤬

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If he just completely paused and doesn't start again, we all have to start drinking and not stop till 2028.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If he talks about “trying his goodest” again, finish the bottle

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sigh..

Of a the parts of that statement that were problematic, him using the made up word 'goodest', was the least of these.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Oh, I am well aware.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Let your heart guide you.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The country is about to go down the shitter because democracy means picking between two geriatric boomers.

Wonderful! Just wonderful. Meanwhile -- no fix for, housing, education, income inequality, stock market run amok, global warming, transportation....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

And even if the status quo triumphs, it won't even solve the problem in 2026, 2028, etc.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don’t have any doubts. I have grave concerns that anyone, literally anyone, would argue that DT is a better option than Biden in any regard. That’s not to say I’m happy to have an old white dude as the nominee but he’s been exceptionally productive and has near infinite less baggage than the alternative.

I’ve yet to be presented with a legit legal way Biden could drop out and allow voters to choose another candidate. Lots of opinions that he should do it but no experts weighing in on how. I could have missed a lot of coverage so I ask people to respectfully share this policy with me.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Supreme Court 2017, after it was established in court that the DNC rigged the primary against Bernie, made a ruling established that the DNC is a private company and can do whatever the fuck they want to decide on a nominee at any point, regardless of whatever the delegates are.

There are no legal barriers to replacing Biden. In fact, his replacement can basically double dip with donors.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

This. The Democratic party could run a nonbinding online caucus if they felt like.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I guess I need to learn more about the relationship between the party committees, state's laws for getting someone on the ballot, primary elections, the ballot box, and the electoral college. Why have a primary election in each state if the party can just put whomever they want on the general election ballot? Could the DNC literally just do a switcheroo and put Hilary (for example) on the ballot in November?

Edit: Found this which answered most of my questions.

the choice of a nominee is party business — not state law, not federal law, and not constitutional law.

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/07/qa-how-biden-can-be-replaced-as-the-democratic-nominee/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's all very simple. At the end of the convention we have a nominee and there name goes on the state ballots.

And yes. They could do a Hillary switcheroo.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I had a whole exchange yesterday with folks about it, and they + the research I did along the way really made me question of it was as impossible as it’s being made out to be.

Link to thread

My takeaways from that whole thread are basically that the only states it may prove legally problematic in (at this point, today), are Georgia and Nevada.
(Georgia because while he can still drop, the deadline to add candidates has passed. And Nevada because other sources say it will be a problem, but I can’t figure out the actual rules!)

But, for Biden to drop, he has to be willing to drop. And he has to do it before he’s declared the nominee by the Democratic Party. And (regardless of their merit) the lawsuits and any injunctions that happen due to those lawsuits must be cleared before the states run out of time to print ballots. Time is rapidly ticking away for that option, if it’s even possible.

As far as both actual candidates go, they’re both different flavors of Zaphod Beeblebrox.
They could just roofie me for 4 years and assign me to the party that wins, and it’ll be the same outcome. The real leadership comes from their donors, the cabinet (and their donors), the political party (and their donors), and their advisors (and the donors for the think tanks they represent).
Shit, maybe that’s why the parties keep running neurologically impaired old men.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

When Trump shows signs of dementia, it’s crickets. When it’s Biden, all the big media outlets lose their fucking shit. The double standards are wild.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

5:30pm East

Possible to stream from the White House's website or to stream from a bunch media YouTube channels (APNews will have it).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


President Joe Biden will hold a news conference Thursday, the key event in a monumental week during which the Democratic incumbent is fending off calls for him to step aside as the party’s presumptive nominee following a shaky debate performance.

It’s just the type of event that many political watchers have said Biden needs to pull off successfully to turn back demands — including from within his own party — that he withdraw from his reelection battle against presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump.

Here are the details on what White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has referenced as Biden’s “big boy” news conference:

Biden will be speaking from the Walter E. Washington Convention Center, a short distance from the White House, where many events of the ongoing NATO summit are being held.

Aside from some apparent exceptions — like incidents in which two Black radio hosts said Biden’s campaign sent them planned questions ahead of time — it’s not standard practice for the president to know precisely what will come up during interviews or news conferences.

His aides prepare him for a host of possibilities based off the headlines of the day, so they’re prepping him for the likelihood that journalists will want to ask about his fitness for office, the NATO summit or other topics.


The original article contains 500 words, the summary contains 216 words. Saved 57%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you’re not asking why Trump isn’t talking about the real issues and instead ranting and raving like he’s at a fucking rally during a DEBATE then you’re the problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Trumps coherence needs more attention. If you actually listen, a lot of stuff he says doesn't make even sense. We're picking between 2 geriatrics after all.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

If you’re not asking why Trump isn’t talking about the real issues and instead ranting and raving like he’s at a fucking rally during a DEBATE then you’re the problem.