this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
-31 points (27.5% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3620 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The reelection campaign for US President Joe Biden is shifting strategy by pulling attack ads on Donald Trump following the assassination attempt on his life, and instead is looking to blame pro-Palestinian protesters for the current political climate in the country.

Reuters reported on Sunday, citing campaign officials who spoke on condition of anonymity, that instead of targeting former President Trump, the White House and Biden campaign will "draw on the president's history of condemning all sorts of political violence including his sharp criticism of the 'disorder' created by campus protests over the Israel-Gaza conflict".

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Biden wants to make it clear that terrorism is always the fault of brown people. Even if the shooter is a white Republican.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Can't understand why Strom Thurmond's best friend isn't winning bigger with Millennials and Zoomers.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Wow talk about a losing message.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

For what it's worth, MSN's reprint of Reuters' report had this passage

Rather than verbally attacking Trump in the coming days, the White House and the Biden campaign will draw on the president's history of condemning all sorts of political violence including his sharp criticism of the "disorder" created by campus protests over the Israel-Gaza conflict, campaign officials said on condition of anonymity.

But in Reuters version of it (which has been updated more recently) that passage is gone - https://archive.is/cpvVW

I'd bet some old dipshit who's been doing campaign work for the Democratic party long enough to have a soundbite about school bussing integration programs said this idiotic crap, then someone on Biden's campaign under the age of fifty read it and told the old dipshit what an incredibly stupid self-own that was, and forced the old dipshit to call up Reuters and ask them to pull that quote.

It would be a lot better if we didn't have to go through these episodes of old dipshits saying fucking stupid and offensive shit about their own base, but I think there are at least people on the Biden campaign who realize how completely fucking stupid this talking point would be.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

We'll see. Just because they haven't used it yet doesn't mean they won't.

Especially since the man at the top of the ticket was chastised by his eventual running mate for his work regarding busing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

You keep those fucking attack ads. As a matter of fact you fucking lay out that Trump is such a god damned threat to democracy that a right-winger wanted to assassinate him. Come on! You play dirtier than Trump because the stakes are far too high to not.

Hell, you know that if this happened to Biden instead Trump the human bowel movement and his poop streak followers wouldn't hold back.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's always someone else with democrats, and never their ineptitude in governing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Blaming others in the most self-destructive way is part and parcel of their ineptitude.