this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024

83 points (94.6% liked)

World News

38506 readers

3087 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Germany to halve military aid to Ukraine from €8bn a year to €4bn (www.telegraph.co.uk)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(sorry I'm two days late with the news, but I thought it was interesting)

all 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Personally as a German. while disappointing at facevalue, i wouldn't read too much into it in respect to any shifts in the commitment to supporting Ukraine (but i might also be wrong here).

To me this very much is an internal self-inflicted struggle about balancing budgets and we'll only be able to tell whether it actually affected things in retrospect (if it's even possible).

In the end maybe more purchases will be directed through EU funds (of which Germany pays a substantial share) or instead of direct aid things are financed through low interest rate loans (that later might even get forgiven). Or you have some other kind of schemes where aid indirectly goes towards Ukraine.

And who knows how the conflict will change, promting adjustments in deliveries. Like the recent airstrikes probably leading towards more air defense systems being delivered than originally anticipated (with a single Patriot system being worth as much as 1 billion if i understand it correctly)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I sincerely hope you are correct in this because this sort of funding cut, if it is what it sounds like and not your explanation, is absolutely the last thing Ukraine needs right now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well i aswell hope that this isn't just my bias speaking :)

Unlike France or GB, which recently had elections substantially changing majorities, here in Germany it's still the exact same people in charge since the start of this war. With the only major change being the defense minister, and that was for the better. So the people deciding here are the same that (based on this article) doubled this years support budget. And as far as i am aware there really hasn't been any major event that would have shifted the sentiment in foreign politics from what we've experienced until now.

On the side of internal politics as mentioned it is basically a self-inflicted struggle to balance the budget and limit new debt. Because for some reason we chose to write that into our constitution, restraining our options. So everyone is fighting for their share and by the looks the winners are the usual: more money to secure pensions for old people and the automotive industry. While not only the budget for Ukraine is on the chopping block, but also other stuff like a reform of welfare for children or infrastructure projects for railroads.

Might sound bad, but it's nothing really new and so far lack of funds hasn't been an issue delaying German support. So i don't expect it to be going forward either. We'll just keep moving in lockstep with what others provide, slowly build out capacity and react to new developments. Which would be no change to how we've seem to have handled it so far, and not like "the slashing the budget by half" would imply.

And as mentioned above i am sure there are plenty of additional ways to support Ukraine that don't hinge on the budget. Like telling Ukraine to direcly purchase through the manufacturers and giving security assurances for loans. Might be a worse deal on paper for Ukraine, but in the short/medium term wouldn't make a practical difference. And things can get sorted later.

But regardless of how this plays out we won't have any type of deadlock like the one delaying US aid until recently. And the largest party in the opposition is also in favor of supporting Ukraine, despite taking any opportunity to take shots at whatever the governing parties decide.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

thanks for your input

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I am a bit more pessimistic than you. The "social democrats" SPD made their EU campaign on claiming to be the party that brings peace in Europe. The "liberal" (aka neoliberal with some alt-right tendencies) FDP was annoyed to have to start helping Ukraine instead of Russia just succeeding with the invasion and more business to be made under a new status quo. The "green" party has turned to be the most staunch supporter of weapon deliveries and military investments now. However their entire foreign policy is focused around doing what the US says and does.

If Trump wins, Germany will be quick to let Ukraine fall to Russia. Another big issue are the state level elections in eastern German states, where either fascist AfD governments or polarized deadlocks are to be expected. The AfD is a big Putin fanclub.

Also looking at how Germany left Afghanistan backstabbing and sacrificing the people die that risked their lives helping you, is the go to way of German foreign politics now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

If they drop support now the Ukrainian meatgrinder is exhausted it's going to be interesting how the media will spin it.

Everyone was been told Ukraine wouldn't be abandoned no matter what.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Germany's going to regret that if Putin decides he can start marching through Poland.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Part of me would like to see him try and march through Poland. It may be the quickest way to end Putin

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Throughout the war, U.S. officials have assessed that President Vladimir V. Putin is loath to expand the war beyond Ukraine’s borders."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, well, I'm relieved now. Everyone knows that the U.S. has never made incorrect assessments, let alone intentionally incorrect ones.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You don't need to be some geopolitical genius to know that this assessment is correct - Russia simply doesn't have the economic and logistical power to engage in a wider European conflict with any prospect of success, and this was perfectly clear even before Russia invaded Ukraine and before everyone lost their minds to Putin-hysteria.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Good thing Russia isn't making friends with China and India, who could collectively give them a ton of support, am I right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

There is a total of 0 chance that India would actively aid Russia in a war against NATO. Especially if Modi and Trump are the respective heads of state.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good thing Russia isn’t making friends with China and India,

China has no friends - it's like the US in that regards. And India even struggles to project power within it's own borders, never mind outside it.

China could help Russia logistically, but Putin (and all of China's other "allies" - and I use that term lightly) understand fully well that China's "loyalty" can switch at any time - just ask Jonas Savimbi if you don't believe me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

China is already helping Russia.

https://www.bbc.com/news/60571253

Modi just had a big state visit to Russia.

I don't need to ask Jonas Savimbi, I've been reading current events.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

China is already helping Russia.

As I've already said... China could help Russia logistically - but this help could disappear in a puff of hot air tomorrow. Again... China has no friends.

Modi just had a big state visit to Russia.

And this doesn't mean much in any way whatsoever.

I don’t need to ask Jonas Savimbi, I’ve been reading current events.

Actual history will tell you a lot more than warmed-over propaganda.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why are you talking about actual history when you want me to ask something of a dead person?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fine. Don't ask Jonas Savimbi. Ask the entirety of Vietnam - or do you have a problem verifying the histories of countries, too?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The entirety of Vietnam? Do you mean their entire population? Because I assume they have a range of viewpoints like humans everywhere else on Earth and are not some sort of homogeneous hived-mind entity. Is that what you believe?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The entirety of Vietnam?

Yes, the entirety of Vietnam - unless you think that there are plenty of Vietnamese who don't know or don't believe that Vietnam was invaded by China during the Cold War... twice.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And because they were invaded by China during the Cold War, they all agree that China isn't going to substantially aid Russia in their invasion of Ukraine?

All 98 million of them? Even the babies?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does being ridiculous come naturally to you?

Or does it only show up when your white liberalism-derived hysteria is threatened by reality?

Here.

Ask Vietnamese people how quickly China can turn on it's "allies." I'm sure they will be glad to tell you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does being ridiculous come naturally to you?

Why yes, I worked professionally in comedy for many years.

your white liberalism-derived hysteria

I honestly have no idea what you're talking about.

Ask Vietnamese people how quickly China can turn on it’s “allies.” I’m sure they will be glad to tell you.

You once again are telling me that all Vietnamese people think exactly the same thing including the babies. Which is pretty bigoted. Are you sure that is the stance you are taking here?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You once again are telling me that all Vietnamese people think

Are USians a monolith because most USians can find the US on a map? Are Africans a monolith because most of them know the sky is blue?

Do you think most Vietnamese live in a whole bunch of alternative universes with different basic historical facts?

Is there something wrong with you?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is the second time you have violated the civility rule. I would not suggest doing it a third time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

All of that kompromat on German officials is paying off

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Gotta have to pay for company cars somehow