this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
313 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3339 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Wray said it's not clear yet whether it might have been shrapnel

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 177 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

His insecurity-induced attack is pretty much confirmation that the bullet didn't touch him

[–] [email protected] 70 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Easy enough for him to prove it— just take the maxi pad off and show the public.

But now he has a bigger problem, eventually he has to make his lie match his purported ear damage.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"I got some great plastic surgery, the best plastic surgery. Better than the world has ever seen."

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

#needs more orange 🍊

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just when I thought Trump finally suffers some kind of paltry consequence and he didn't even get shot. Reality sucks.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We got thrust into the stupidest timeline. Although the tacos are pretty decent.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If these are the tacos we get, imagine how awesome the other timeline's tacos must be!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

It's so insecure right? To anyone who is confident or reflective it wouldn't matter.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Wouldn't be a big deal if he didn't already have the whole storyline of Jesus personally coming down from the heavens to nudge poor ol' Trump's head out of the way so that we can witness the peace and prosperity of fascist rule under a convicted fraudster

[–] [email protected] 79 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I remember one of the first things I heard was that a bullet struck the teleprompter and he was hit by broken glass. I never heard anything about it after that, so I assumed it was just false; but it made a whole lot of sense at the time.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (3 children)

wheres the teleprompter now? wouldn't that tell all?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

Dead teleprompters tell no tales.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Hopefully it was taken into evidence immediately, but who knows.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] treadful 8 points 3 months ago

The teleprompter thing seems to have been debunked but that doesn't mean it was a bullet either.

[–] Omgboom 73 points 3 months ago (4 children)

He wasn't really shot, I'm calling it

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Some people speculated on this from day 1 when he wasn't posing for photos with his "bullet wound."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 3 months ago

he doesn't want to cooperate= confirmed shrapnel

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The question was whether a bullet or shrapnel hit Trump. But of course, Trump does not comprehend nuance.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The question about whether it was a bullet or shrapnel wouldn't even be in the news if Trump didn't insist on playing up being an inch from death. Either answer would have been far less important than being shot at but no, he had to make the question about what hit him a big deal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Trump does not comprehend nuance.

I'm dizzy trying to figure out if this is irony, sarcasm, redundant, humour, reality, serious, comical, factual, dystopian...or did the psilocybin just kick in, on so many levels?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Whoa, it wasn’t meant as some deep, philosophical statement. I just meant that Trump likely doesn’t comprehend Wray’s distinction between getting shot with a bullet and being struck by shrapnel.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Sorry, omitted the "/s".
It was more hyperbolic and melodramatic, though. "/h + /m".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

/a for apropo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Either way, it shouldn't matter, someone still got close to killing him. But of course, Trump probably insists that people say he got hit by a bullet.

I'm sure we'll find out eventually unless he decides to continue wearing his maxi-pad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This story could have just gone away, with most people never hearing that maybe he just has a little cut under his big gauze pad and anyone trying to bring it up looking extremely petty. But nope, Trump himself can't just let things pass unanswered.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Also worth noting: Wray's statements were made in response to questions asked by Jim Jordan.

This isn't something Democrats went looking to dig up. It got stirred up by one of Trump's frothiest allies.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Wait, Santorum isn't in congress though...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Trying to milk the pity party as long as he can to try and keep the spotlight off of Harris is all.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago (1 children)

For anyone who was wondering why Trump refused to release the medical report after the shooting, this is why.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're telling me Dementia Don the racist rapist with 34 felonies wouldn't release a medical report of him getting "shot"? If he had proof he was shot, It'd be on tshirts made in China and plastered all over the place. It'd be on billboards, flyers in the mail, and everywhere you look.

This is the proof that he didn't get shot, he got hit by shrapnel.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

But he's usually so honest and forthright

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Trump definitely did not fuck a couch.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago

Fuck it? I’m more likely to believe that he raped it and then tried to pay it off using campaign funds.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Trump definitely did not fuck a couch.

Citation?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He didn't pay hush money to the couch.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

'Big Sofa' is out to get him and Vance.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Their sexionals are on sale.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have it on good authority that he also has not denied raping and murdering a young girl in the 1990s.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Ghislaine, that you?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

When you are president, they just let you sit on them.

Even with a full diaper!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fingers crossed! I have 'shrapnel' on my election bingo card! I just need "Black Hillary" (thanks for that one @[email protected]) and 'JD cries'.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

The New York times did a video analysis that pretty convincingly showed it was a bullet. Why Trump is hiding evidence is just bizarre, like the idea of having to support anything he claims - even true things! - is offensive.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/26/us/politics/trump-shooter-bullet-trajectory-ear.html

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It was a splinter wasn't it?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago

He got bone spurs in his ears.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Shootings. How do they work. Nobody knows.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

They followed up that it was likely a bullet or bullet fragment

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Maybe we should ask Putin?

load more comments
view more: next ›