politics

On page 69, Roberts targets the Swampoodle dog park in Washington, D.C., for having too much room for dogs to play and not enough for children, blaming this on “the antifamily culture shaping legislation, regulation, and enforcement throughout our sprawling government."

What I read is that the GOP is/was about to start a culture war on dog parks. So they don't like cat owners, dog owners, health care, child care, birth control, childless people, children, or the poor. I'm guessing that leaves roughly 1% of the population.

The tastiest 1%

After going after cat owners first, they're now going after the dog people demographic. Good coverage there for making literally everybody dislike them.

These people are damn determined to make everybody else as miserable as them.

They would like to remind everyone that dogs are not allowed in the dog park. People are not allowed in the dog park. It is possible you will see hooded figures in the dog park. Do not approach them. Do not approach the dog park. The fence is electrified and highly dangerous. Try not to look at the dog park and especially do not look for any period of time at the hooded figures. The dog park will not harm you.

Dude shaking fat asses' hand in the thumbnail looks like the bad guy from Con Air

what is it about the dog parks that need to be included in a presidential election debate?

We're talking about parks for dogs, right? Like dog owners can go there and meet other dogs owners with their dogs? Or there's something I don't know?

My wife and I have dogs because we love our dogs, we don't have children due to medical limitations. Guess we're the scourge of society, despite our contributions to society by way of charity, being involved in our communities, and helping wherever we can, which wouldn't be possible with kids due to time constraints.

Going after dog owners is a strategy.

“It’s a bold move Cotton, let’s see if it pays off.”

So that's who Kristi Noem was pandering too.

Think about the oldest conservative Supreme Court Justice, they've been after this stuff for longer than that. If you're ever tempted to rose colour the past, or think they've changed, remember how long ago those justices that struck down Roe were elevated.

The more I learn about these people and project 2025 the more angry I get with our society that we are so polite and so moral that we allow them to continue to draw breath.

I really cannot believe not one person has tried to kill these people. If anyone deserved to be put in front of a firing squad, these people do... To hell with moral high ground, to hell with being polite. We're too tolerant of their intolerance.

This isn't about dogs btw... My comment is about project 2025 and the heritage foundation in it's entirety, not just the content of this post. I've learned more than I care to know already today and it has left me in a blind rage.

Dog parks really? Do they want to flaunt their dogs everywhere they go?