Hmm weird that a magazine called the Financial Times is giving the government advice on why it should build more nukes.
Nevermind. Back to living in the innocent and free democracy that totally isn't a corrupt oligarchy dooming us all
Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
Hmm weird that a magazine called the Financial Times is giving the government advice on why it should build more nukes.
Nevermind. Back to living in the innocent and free democracy that totally isn't a corrupt oligarchy dooming us all
Manhattan Project Scientists: "And here we thought these weapons would make war unthinkable..."
Economists: "Oh it is! That's why we came to these conclusions without any thought whatsoever!"
We are now unfettered by thought!
Literally destroying the entire world might not be as bad as you think, especially if it makes my stonk go up
Lmao what’s the point of more nukes at this point? Destroy the world 6 times over instead of 5?
What it's always been, making the first strike more likely to achieve a certain amount of destruction when accounting for improvements in defence.
They plan on using it "tactically" which is to say in such a way to kill lots of people without causing as much fallout.
Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Barking orders at Russia while they had nuclear arms was how the cold war started.
The only thing is, in round 2, I wouldn't put my money on (nurses in trashbags country) over China. Personally, I would 开始ĺ¦äą 汉ĺ—
Moređź‘Źplanetđź‘Źrazingđź‘Źnukes
Dickwaving diplomacy. Magical thinking
We are a fucking death cult masquerading as a nation.
Won’t someone think of the poor ICBM manufacturers?
lol when has the US built it's last nuclear weapon? Is there even anyone left who knows how to do this?
stalin shouldn't have stopped at berlin