this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19016 readers
3585 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

So after a bit of digging, this is not really ABC's or the FCC's fault. There's an equal opportunity statute that requires networks to show paid political ads from legitimate candidates unedited and uncensored. They're not allowed to reject them either. Obviously it's meant to keep networks from tampering with the candidates political message and to give everyone a fair shot at campaigning, these assholes are just clearly taking advantage...

[–] [email protected] 64 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Nazis prohibited abortion in Germany in the 40s.

Just like nazis are doing in the US today.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Hey now. Communists also prohibited abortion - specifically in Romania in the 1950s under President Nicolae Ceaușescu.

The following thirty years saw a flood of children showing up in foster homes and orphanages. Romania became a hotbed of infant human trafficking as overseas "adoption" agencies trafficked newborn children out of the country. Women pursuing illegal abortions underwent crude and dangerous procedures which periodically ended in sterility or mortality for the pregnant woman. And the surge in uneducated, unemployed youths never grew up to provide any kind of long term dividend to the Romanian economy as Ceaușescu intended. Instead, they became the vanguard of the opposition movement (a heavily fascist one, at that) which ultimately brought down the government and ushered in years of civil war and horrific bloodshed.

The modern Romanian state still carries the scars of a policy that put pregnancy before human decency and economic growth ahead of quality of life.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 hours ago

It's weird how terms used by the right wing can become so twisted, words such as "Constitution". Also, "freedom", "liberty", "patriotism"....

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 hours ago

Absolutely fucking ghoulish, never heard of this clown but I hope he siphons votes from the weirdo.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Of course, the weirdo refugee from the mid-70s makes an ad like this. ABC must really hate women to air it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

They didn’t have a choice - they’re required by law to broadcast ads from candidates that meet a certain minimum

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Is there a link to the video (or a way to watch it, anyway) that doesn’t require signing in to YouTube? I’m not about to make an account with them for this video, but it wouldn’t play through invidious either, and I’m not sure if there are other options.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 minutes ago

The best option now that google has killed invidious is FreeTube combined with the Libredirect add-on.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago

Ooh. This fuckin guy. Leader of the constitution party. Pretty sure Channel 5 talked with him a bit. This dude is solely focused on abortion and pushing a total ban on it. I only ever see him attacking Democrats. He tried to run an ad during the super bowl but the FCC said no because it was too graphic.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago

Jesus fucking Christ, that was allowed on broadcast television? What the fuck

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 hours ago

Entertainment Weekly - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Entertainment Weekly:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://ew.com/anti-abortion-ad-targets-the-view-hosts-8726406
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support