this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
161 points (98.8% liked)

3DPrinting

15250 readers
30 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: [email protected] or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been using gyroid infil almost exclusively since I first tried it.

I was using cubic before, which was fine, but gyroid seems much sturdier for the same % infil even if it does take a bit more print time.

Also it looks awesome.

top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I can hear the noise my printer makes in my head just looking at this picture

wooo wabble waddle waddle wooo

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=QKj0xzFF_xk

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=v4xZUr0BEfE

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Hehe yeah. So awesome! Its freaking therapy for my brain

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It's like a little dance for every layer

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

until you start going fast then it sounds like it's just gonna break half the damn timw

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

It's Prusa's favourite for a reason. I like the look a lot so that combined with it being strong and non-crossing is why I use it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I just wish it didn’t take so much longer to print than adaptive cubic at the same infill percent.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=upELI0HmzHc&

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, adaptive cubic varies the density of the cubic structure to decrease filament usage while supposedly maintaining the same strength as normal cubic. And, in my own experience, gyroid always takes longer to print than adaptive cubic – sometimes it only adds a few minutes, but I’ve seen it add nearly half of the print time again for infill-heavy prints.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

True, although the idea is to print significantly less of it because of how sturdy it is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same. Sometimes you want something fast. For things that don't need to be sturdy at all (little display figures and stuff like that) I'll use cubic or even lightning infil

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could also just use a lower infill percentage since it's stronger

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There's a type of cubic that starts out lower and increases in density as it reaches the top to support the top layers. That's mainly the one I was thinking of. I can't remember the name of it though. And lightning is suuuper fast but provides basically no strength

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s all I use similar strength in every direction low material use and ease of print (it’s waves but no sharp corners so easy on the printer’s acceleration.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I do like that it doesn't jerk the printer, just a little wiggle!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

!https://i.imgur.com/NuuFF9v.gifv

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

same journey for me, cubic then gyroid.

I love the way it looks so much I made some coasters using gyroid infill with no top layers, and filled it with resin. such a cool pattern

I even made a vent cover with it since it lets air through still and looks cool

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a cool idea for the coaster! I might do that if I ever get into pouring resin

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks! It's fun to mix both skills into one project.

Here is how they turned out

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those look great! What is the top left one?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lightning infill from Cura

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought so but I've only ever used it on taller TPU prints where I want them to basically be hollow so I've never seen it look quite like that!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

fairly high infil percentage if I remember correctly. I did 20% first and it was very sparse

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like it, but sometimes I have to use something like concentric for thinner pieces. But in general, it is pretty neat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I haven't had a use case where something is too thin for gyroid yet. I can definitely see that being useful though!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I switched my petg to gyroid after having a hard time with cubic. It works nicely.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is PETG also - it makes for super sturdy prints.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

4 walls 30% gyro infill. Strong as a rock.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Increase the extrusion width on the infil as well- it’ll print the same amount of material, butb juice the strength phenomenally. 150% of default (which is usually at or near nozzle width,) for appearance parts. 200% for strength

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a good tip - I haven't tried that yet. I'll give it a shot next time I need something sturdy

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It also speeds up infill printing (because it takes fewer passes, I’ve found.)

I can’t take credit- that goes to cnc kitchen

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have to find something to print with that - I don't usually do the slicing, but I'm totally going to use gyroid infill whenever I can. Probably as a feature - like someone else said, make coasters without the top or bottom layer, and use it decoratively. Awesome!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

My phone case is gyroid without the bottom layer.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Did you probably happen to compare it to 3d honeycomb? Quite pleased with that meself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't tried that one yet. I don't see that one in Cura - is that in prusa slicer?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's available in the Prusa Slicer

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only advantage 3d honeycomb has is speed.

3dh Is directional, has stress points, and has less fluid transitions between changing layers.

Unless you’re absolutely in a hurry, it’s easily the best infill.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That is literally its biggest disandadvantage lol.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upELI0HmzHc&t=417

3D honeycomb is insanely slow. It takes like double or triple the time and is super stressful on the printer because of very high accelerations.

Pretty much its only use of honeycomb seems to be making the absolute strongest prints in compression strength. 3D honeycomb is slightly better, but it is essentially the master of none. Line and rectilinear have the best surface, cubic and gyroid have the best transverse strength. Triangle has as good of compression strength and transverse strength as honeycomb and better than 3D honeycomb while taking a fraction of the time to print.

Honeycomb is probably one of the worst "popular" infills.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=upELI0HmzHc&

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upELI0HmzHc&t=417

Honeycomb is insanely slow and only strong in 1 direction as opposed to all directions like gyroid. 3D honeycomb isn't much better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=upELI0HmzHc&

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Gyroid is my default infill. I like it.