this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
208 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2483 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A Texas federal bankruptcy judge has ordered an evidentiary hearing to review the auction process that awarded Infowars to satire site The Onion, citing concerns about transparency.

Alex Jones, who owes $1.5 billion to Sandy Hook families, claims the process was “rigged” and expects the site to be returned to him.

Attorneys for Elon Musk’s X Corp. unexpectedly joined the case, with Jones suggesting Musk will play a key role.

Despite the sale proceeding, Jones resumed Infowars broadcasts, while The Onion plans to relaunch the platform as a satire in January. The hearing is set for next week.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So the argument is that it was unfair to sell Infowars to The Onion, because they weren't the highest bidder - rather, the Sandy Hook parents approved of this bid, and not any others that were higher.

BUT... Those Sandy Hook parents also agreed to forfeit a portion of their settlement in exchange for favoritism towards the Onion, making that bid the one that would cover the largest number of settlement dollars, which is the primary goal of auctioning off his assets in the first place.

So good luck arguing against this sale. The Sandy Hook parents have $1.4B worth of settlement dues to work with, and they know that they aren't going to see most of it repaid in their lifetimes. They can keep conditionally forfeiting money until you'd need to pay hundreds of millions to acquire Infowars. If Elon decided to do that anyway, the cash would go straight to the parents, and he'd be opening himself up to massive liabilities the moment Alex Jones inevitably opens his mouth about Sandy Hook conspiracy shit on X.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Texas judge" all bets are off in the new world.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I dont think so in this case. Texas judge was the first one to find him guilty by default. Even Texas Supremem Court slapped down his argument that the suit was not valid. They do not seem to want to play ball with his bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That was in the before times . . .

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago

You speak the truetrue.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago

Elon musk will now bail out every nazi asshole in trouble.

Your tax dollars ar play

[–] [email protected] 88 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Musk has too much power and overreach. He's attending to every far right infant in existence making sure they keep spreading misinformation.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And nobody can or is willing to stop him

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Masters are merely men, when the sun goes down.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Why would you say something so brave, yet true?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Pardon any errors here (Cunningham's law and all), I was a bit toasty while listening to the knowledge fight episode.

My favorite part of this whole thing is that he's calling shenanigans because he knows that the high bid didn't win. And Alex signed documents acknowledging there were other factors.

There were 2 bids. Just 2. And do you know what the high bid was? $3.5 million. That's it. A paltry sum for his life's work. The price of a McMansion in California.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

https://www.zillow.com/del-mar-ca/houses/

There is a $2.5 million house in there. The McMansions seem to be trending more towards $5+ million.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately I don't think Alex has any rights on any money there

[–] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago

He would care because the money would pay off debts, and if a lower bid was accepted, then less of that debt is paid off. However, apparently the families (the debt holders) agreed to forfeit part of that debt so The Onion's bid could be accepted.

As is often the case, your lawyers can file any paperwork to try to stop things. Doesn't mean it will go anywhere. It only delays the inevitable.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“I was told Elon is going to be very involved in this,” Jones said during a live broadcast on X. After Infowars was seized and the site shut down, Jones promptly began operating under the name and branding of a new venture, dubbed the Alex Jones Network, which streams on X.

That's the reason, they're using the media and courts as advertising to get it out there.

The sale will go thru and they'll both make a big show about "the only place for the truth is X!"

Because everyone literally does forget about Truth Social till someone mentions it

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

This isn't going anywhere. I listened to the recent Knowledge Fight episode, and he's just being a whiny little baby about it, trying anything and everything to stop the sale of his company and assets.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But... Alex Jones lost his business because it wasn't the truth, determined in a court of law.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago

Which would be a great point if we lived in a world where facts and laws mattered.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

I just don't like the non-zero chance that this somehow gets reversed once the Trump administration begins. Jones is a huge Trump supporter, and I could absolutely see him meddling in this case in whatever illegal-but-theyll-make-it-legal way he can. The outright bribery and corruption is on full display, and I absolutely could see Trump do this even if only to show everybody else the rewards they might receive if they get on board.