this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
1081 points (98.5% liked)

Memes

44940 readers
2489 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 92 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Contrary to popular opinion: the old civilizations that named the stars didn't name them after animals, but people.

This isn't a animal representation of a goat. But in fact named after Steve Goat's massive dong.

Source: me, a professional astro-dickologist

[–] [email protected] 51 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Find somewhere without light pollution, and you'll see a goat

[–] [email protected] 57 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Inca astronomers in the Andean mountains saw such dark skies that they actually starting identifying and naming the dark spots of the Milky Way.

Personally I spent a couple of winters in the far northern wilderness in northern Ontario ... way up close to Hudson Bay. Hundreds of miles away from strong light pollution on a cold February night was the closest I ever felt to being in space ... the cold clear night sky is so brilliant, there are stars all the way down to the horizon and you literally feel like standing on the edge of the planet.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago

I really want to feel that at least just once

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

Aboriginal Australians also had 'constellations' that were the dark spots in the sky as opposed to the stars. I didn't know some Inca did that as well.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I know this may or may not be commonly known. But the lines or stick figures drawn with stars that we come to associate are just a tiny part of the constellation. Sometimes called asterism. The actual constellation is the entirety of all stars that fall between the region. So it's more the cloud of stars inside the constellation. In the past it was a figure or silhouette. Modern constellations are squarish regions of sky. If you have a clear uncontaminated sky, the figures are still sorta visible to the naked eye.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Must have been a lot more easy to become familiar with when people weren't living in light pollution 24/7.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

I literally was wondering as I scrolled through the comments about how different the sky could have looked when constellations were named and maybe thats why they don't make as much sense now visually, and how it's weird I never thought about or considered it before. Then bam. Your comment.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Yes. The Greeks are literally why you have to pretend to respect people that talk about Pisces in ascendency or whatever, and their astrologers were their astronomers, they recognized the difference between observation and divination but used the terms interchangeably nonetheless.

There are some famous examples who doubtless thought the mysticism was nonsense, but it was what paid the bills so they told their patrons what they wanted to hear and then went back to their math and charts.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

It's older than the Greeks. The astrologers in Mesopotamia already collected historic events as a source for predictions

The Greeks mostly copied that. If they created it, they wouldn't have used this 'goat' as the first constellation of the year that started with the spring equinox.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Do Cassiopeia now. Literally boobies.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This post is worthless without a picture of them boobies.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

That's so fucking hot.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

No it's HD Bobs. Tomb raider style.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Whoa whoa whoa, WTF dude. Put a NSFW tag on this. Some people have jobs and can get fired for this.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

✅ Featherless ❌ Biped

Well it’s not a man, could be a goat

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The thing people always overlook is that some of those names were given to the shapes that were seen thousands of years ago. And since then the position of those stars as we perceive them have changed quite a bit. And if they've moved in dissimilar directions, there can be quite a substantial change in the shape we see compared to what they saw. So the older the designation of a constellation is, the more it's distorted.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Due to the sheer size of space, this is most likely to have happened to stars closer to us (same thing as parallax effect, the same speed / moved distance moves something close more angular degrees across the sky)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, it's mostly because of precession of the axis of rotation of the earth.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

That just rotates the sky relative to somebody on earth, that doesn't really change how each star sign looks from earth if the stars are far away

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Logging the sky since forever, OP is such a doofus for reposting this 🤭

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Wait for what, a princess to show up? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

In the ancient world there was no difference between astrologer and astronomer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

They be astrologging and we couldn't stop them cutting those astrotree!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I don't get the joke. Can people not see it's clearly a goat?!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I recognize this eagle from US symbolism 😍

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That is clearly a pterodactyl

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Mouse cursor.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

no, it's actually a quetzalcoatlus that lived a long time ago so they probably met the ancient greeks

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

What a coincidence, I just watched Q

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Isn't that Labia Minoris?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Big dipper is the only one that makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Really? Ursa major, the big bear?

The swan at least resembles a stick-figure bird.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

The Big Dipper != Ursa Major. It’s part of Ursa Major (the butt and tail). And it does look like a dipper (ladle)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Orion isn’t bad, with his belt and “sword”.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Except the dangling thing under his belt is definitely... not part of his belt.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Mallrat to "Astrologers":

Ha ha ha ha. You dumb bastard. It's not a (goat)... it's a Sailboat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

A goat is a sailboat!