this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
247 points (94.6% liked)

politics

18904 readers
2967 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

With a government shutdown four days away, thanks largely to House Republicans’ inability to stop fighting amongst themselves, far-right Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert thought it important to focus on their pet grievances on Wednesday.

Greene successfully used the Holman rule to attach an amendment to a short-term defense spending bill to reduce Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s yearly salary to $1. Austin, the first African American Secretary of Defense, was “destroying our military” and had allowed recruitment to fall to “crisis levels,” Greene huffed.

The move was purely a stunt: She previously said she’d vote against the defense bill anyway because she objected to its inclusion of aid for Ukraine.

Not to be outdone, Boebert successfully inserted an amendment to reduce the annual salary for Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness Shawn Skelly, who is transgender, to $1.

In a transphobic rant, she accused Skelly of espousing “wokeism” that had caused “significant harm to our military readiness and troops’ morale.”

Democrats didn’t bother asking for a roll call vote on Greene’s amendment, which is almost certainly dead on arrival in the Senate. She still predictably gloated about it on social media afterwards.

While House Republicans managed to advance the defense bill on Tuesday night, as well as three other spending bills—part of ultraconservative members’ demands to consider 12 individual funding bills rather than one sweeping continuing resolution to keep the government open—House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) has made zero progress on thwarting a shutdown.

He is reportedly planning to bring a short-term funding bill to the floor on Friday that cuts spending and includes border security measures—but at least eight hardline Republicans are still vowing to kill it. According to Politico, they are Reps. Andy Biggs (AZ), Eli Crane (AZ), Cory Mills (FL), Matt Gaetz (FL), Tim Burchett (TN), Andy Ogles (TN), Wesley Hunt (TX) and Matt Rosendale (MT). Boebert is also likely to join them.

“We are going to pass 12 appropriations bills before I will consider a [continuing resolution],” Ogles said.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 102 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If I submitted obviously bunk shit at my work I'd be fired. With lives literally on the line, why do they get to be the loudest clowns in the circus? I'm watching two people with room temperature IQs fuck a country.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

room temperature IQs

This has to be my new favorite insult. I am absolutely going to use this and pass it along, stranger.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even more savage if you live somewhere that uses celsius

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So like, most of the world?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I mean, I didn’t want to be the one to say it, but, yes

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I've always been partial to saying "about as sharp as a pound of wet liver". It just seems more visceral.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately as the years go by, it will become less of an insult.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

They were never hired to govern.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I hate them so very very much. It's terrible that the minority in this country has such an outsize influence.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And this is what conservatives consider politicians.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Huuur she's fightin' fer what I believe in."

Progress doesn't matter. Only optics.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Only winning. And zero sum game. :/

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago

I say we bring back dueling and let those 2 hash it out colonial style.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not convinced MTG and Boebert aren't just the same domestic terrorist that occasionally changes wig color and adds or removes a pair of glasses.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a Tina Fey/Amy Poehler film somewhere in there.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Amy Poehler is gonna need to nearly overdose on HGH assuming she's playing Marjorie

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I guess this is kind of an off colour narrative to partake in but I have wondered for a while, if Michelle Obama is perceived as overly masculine in appearance (and we are all aware of the awful commentary on that topic that I won’t repeat here) then how can we look past Marge over here who literally looks like a World Gym ad circa 1990?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

She looks like micky rourke.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They look like a couple of howler monkeys

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

So I lived in Flores Guatemala, known as the jumping off point to Tikal and other Mayan ruins.

It is also Howler monkey central and you could expect to hear them howling away every day and night, especially in the rain.

Howler monkeys scream with emotion and passion. Politicians are incapable of being that earnest and honest.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's insulting to howler monkeys.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

you know why they have that stupid look on their faces? its because theyre stupid.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

It would be funny if not for the damage they are causing

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The sexual tension is getting out of hand. They really need to expel their egg sacks and fertilize all over each other already.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This is so disgustingly fitting!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That poor man sitting in between those two...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

He's tired, boss. Tired of all the bullshit they slingin'.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've never thought to ask this before, but is seating for congress preassigned? Or is it a "first come first serve" deal?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I would assume it's assigned seating, could be wrong. Man's looks like he would have moved if he could have.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) has made zero progress on thwarting a shutdown.

What an odd line, especially since he killed a bipartisan bill That was introduced specifically to prevent a government shutdown. That statement implies that he is working toward avoiding a government shutdown when in reality he's working very hard to ensure one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, i live in Montana. Let me harass that pos for a min

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Double pos isn't my district and requires a zip code from his own dipshit district to send an email

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I picked some museum in Billings as an address and told him to pass a fuckin budget

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Y’all live in glass houses dudetts… shouldn’t be lobbing stones.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

If Mccarthy gave any fucks for the country, he'd bring an omnibus bill forward and convince a few other Republicans to vote with democrats. Let the cards fall where they will with his speakership.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Is Boebert gonna get handsy?