this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
478 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18898 readers
3067 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 111 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It’s clear that Trump wouldn’t pass the security vetting process. But it is a national security failure that as president he didn’t need to.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Trump couldn’t pass a 4th grade SOL

His rise to presidency highlights failures at every level of our system. He’s always been a crook and a liar and a fraud, but you appeal to the dumbest base and hold up a bible upside down and they can overlook all that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I shudder to think about the sources he's burned. one day the CIA will out all his crimes, just to cover their own asses, but it won't be until he's dead.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Damn this was like the worst-case-scenario when the stolen documents case came up. Like people defending him were saying "he kept some mementos that happened to be classified, stop acting like he's sharing nuclear secrets with the world."

Both shocking that it happened and not shocking that he did it.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 11 months ago

Both shocking that it happened and not shocking that he did it.

I don't find it surprising whatsoever. We had his whole campaign of warning prior to taking the office letting us know what he would be like. Then he did what he said he would and behaved consistent with his prior behavior.

If anything its all a bit on the nose. I'd find it more shocking if the documents didnt contain state level secrets, actionable, that he would be able to profit from.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

anyone that was paying attention was screaming this from the rooftops in 2015 I'm not surprised at all

[–] [email protected] 52 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I remember when Bush was president and I thought “wow it can’t get much dumber/worse than this” — and now every single day i’m confronted with this absurdity.

I’m scared to even say it out loud this time around, knowing now what “republicans” are really capable of.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Can I interest you in a President MTG, President Gaetz, or President Boebart?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (10 children)

Handies in the Oval Office would just be normal

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

I think that would be the only sense of normalcy they would bring with them.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

President Camacho would be a huge improvement over Trump tbh

[–] [email protected] 35 points 11 months ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Trump has consistently proven to the world he is absolutely incapable of shutting the fuck up. Every spy in the world could buy a membership to his shitty golf hotel Mar a Lardo and have unlimited access to American intelligence he keeps just lying around his moldy shithole.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

I was in a band called Moldy Shithole. We were pretty poor, so I had to make do with a rusty trombone.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (2 children)

See - shit like this is why I don't really get my hopes up for the UAP hearings. Trump randomly throws out nuclear secrets just to impress people, because he's a dumb piece of shit. Does anybody really think that idiot could keep his trap shut about proof of alien life?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Really makes you wonder what the aliens have on him

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Gotta be another golden shower tape, that's if aliens pee yellow.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the burgundy shower holocube.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

It's sterile, and he likes the taste!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Unless no one told him ever because they feared exactly this

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Next, it will be "Trump accused of sharing US nuclear submarine information with Russian president Putin"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

He's gotten pretty close to that already. Who knows how much stuff he's told his pal Putin.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-idUSKCN18B2MX

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how much this has to do with the Australian deal for nuclear subs being fought over and eventually going to France's Naval Group, just to have that scrapped for the AUKUS subs being built by BAE Systems?

I'm sure it's nothing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Hey! Look over there, it's a referendum!!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because OF COURSE he would do that! He's never passed up an opportunity for personal gain in his life.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This wasn't even for personal gain, this was purely because he wanted someone to like him. He had the psyche of a 12yo kid who's been bullied his whole life.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Popularity is a personal gain. Especially when you're like Trump and don't have friends, only lackeys and accomplices.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

This wasn't even for personal gain, this was purely because he wanted someone to like him.

That's literally personal gain.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I guess…at least it was Australia? Like, could be worse?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

Except this is just the one we heard about

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Big difference between Australia, a major US ally, and Some Guy who happens to be Australian.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Given we do a lot of business with China, leaking secrets to an Australian isn’t a no biggie just because we’re an ally.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

First of all: like the other guy said, there's a big difference between the Australian government and an Australian businessman. Rupert Murdoch is an example of an Australian businessman.

Second: even if it WAS the government, have you SEEN some of the shithead conservative prime ministers they've had for the last couple decades? I'd be wary to trust any government with the likes of Tony Abbot and Scott Morrison at the top..

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Well, at least Abbott's gone and, let's see... has just been nominated for a position at Fox Corporation's board of directors by the new Murdoch who appears to want to be worse than the old one. Oh boy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Me and my homies don't like Rupert

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Your viewpoint intrigues me and I would like to subscribe to your Substack

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

We will likely never find out what Trump said to Putin in Helsinki.

load more comments
view more: next ›