this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
253 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15910 readers
283 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

nobel prize

ok go on.

economist

bye

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It always makes me laugh because it's not even a real Nobel prize

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not that the Nobel Peace Prize or the Nobel Prize in Literature isn't political horse shit half the time...

[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

We did it. The price of food went from "not cheap" to "holy shit" and its still at "holy shit". We won.

Now everybody needs to stop asking for those fucking raises.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A chicken burrito at Taco Johns costs 7 fucking dollars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

I'm just glad we didn't give everybody raises. These economists clearly were right when they said if everybody got a raise inflation would be insane.

Instead we just had massive inflation at the same wages so everybody is fucked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Literally a Babylon Bee article...

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wow, great news for off-grid homesteaders living in the middle of fucking nowhere and literally no one else

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago

Laughs in price of agricultural inputs

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I recently saw the phrase 'food insecurity' and while I've heard it before, I never realized how weird of a phrase it was. It's poverty, food insecurity is the definition of poverty. But because people have phones or something it doesn't count as poverty?

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I never realized how weird of a phrase it was.

I never googled "food insecurity" because I could imagine what the definition was. But check out the third sentence on the health.gov page. Emphasis mine.

Food Insecurity - Healthy People 2030

Food insecurity is defined as a household-level economic and social condition of limited or uncertain access to adequate food. In 2020, 13.8 million households were food insecure at some time during the year. Food insecurity does not necessarily cause hunger, but hunger is a possible outcome of food insecurity.

And look at the phrasing - "13.8 million households". How many people is that?

---

Libs love terms that they can use to make something they don't want to think about more abstract. In this case - they can avoid having to use sentences like this...

  • They don't get enough to eat.
  • They don't have enough to eat.
  • Sometimes they don't have enough to eat.

And libs don't want to seem cruel and dismissive so they would like to avoid...

  • Sometimes they are forced to skip meals because they don't have enough money.
  • Sometimes they go hungry because they don't have enough money.

Enter "food insecurity". Voilà!

  • They suffer from food insecurity.

No mention of troublesome words like eat, meals, money, hungry or god forbid hunger.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

WHAT ELSE IS THERE

legitimately this makes me feel so much despair

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yachts, exotic animals, Fabergé eggs, precious metals, artisanal cocaine... Normal stuff that you'll need in any household.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There’s used boats! And video games! And amusement parks!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago

Bullshit prize winner in fake “science” says dumb thing, more at 11

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

doomjak: "Please, I just want a house. I'm willing to pay for it and everything, but why are your asking for a million dollars for each?"

smuglord: "Awww, look at the dumb naive kid who doesn't understand that it's just a sign the economy is going well, you wouldn't want to hurt ThE eCoNoMy, would you?"

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

you wouldn't want to hurt ThE eCoNoMy, would you?

I-was-saying

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

Economists are the high priests of capital

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (16 children)

I don't know what's funnier, this

Or this

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He is literally the zombie 😂

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Krugman won a Nobel prize? Lmao

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, just the economics wanna-be Nobel prize

Peter Nobel describes the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel as a "false Nobel prize" that dishonours his relative Alfred Nobel, after whom the prize is named, and considers economics to be a pseudoscience.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago

It's so perfect that the econ Nobel is a knock-off for marketing purposes

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to be confused with the "joke nobel", the one that was once awarded to Kissinger.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Traditional theory builds on the idea that countries differ in resources like capital and labour, thereby explaining why poor countries export agricultural products and import industrial goods from richer countries. But traditional theory does not explain why, in reality, world trade is dominated by rich countries trading similar goods with each other. For instance, a country like Sweden exports Volvo and SAAB cars but also imports BMW and Toyota cars.

there's some interesting work to be done to understand why krugman was given a nobel prize, from a marxist-leninist viewpoint. his work ultimately serves to justify imperialism, to provide a naturalistic explanation for the disparity between rich and poor countries, and thereby obfuscating the role that neocolonial violence plays in suppressing wages and extracting resources for the benefit of the imperial core. and that the nobel prize committee serves to glorify and reinforce this practice for aspiring economists, as a means of ensuring their loyalty to the regime's ideology and stamping out heresy by withholding their imprimatur.

his award lays bare the farce that is the nobel prize. lmao indeed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Vampire gang stays winning. Garlic becoming too expensive to use as a weapon. Nobody has a home so you don't need permission to enter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Mark my words: The Amish will survive us all.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm more convinced it'll be the Mormons. They're far more tightly organized than the Amish.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

While I agree about organization, the Mormons are too dependent on the Technological Industrial Society a-guy

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (10 children)

The mormons in Chihuaha (mexico) are loaded, they have these huge communities that produce every food product, grains/vegetables/fruit/meat/dairy you call it.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

Treat based economic benchmarks

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

If you exclude everything the average American needs to survive, Bidenomics totally fixed the entire economy!

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This guy made the rounds all through 2016 bashing Bernie and his policies for being unrealistic and lacking pragmatism. Wtf is this?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lin-Manuel Miranda could write a musical called Bernie.

---

[Lin-Manuel Miranda plays Professor K who enters from stage left. He immediately starts to rap.]

I'm here to econ-ed-u-rap. Bring the economics knowledge and hit ya with a rap.
I won the Nobel Prize for Economics which doesn't scan right but...

[Chorus] It's important (Important)

[Professor K] Bernie's ideas are unrealistic and lack pragmatism. I'm sorry to say.

[Chorus] Sadly true (true)

[Professor K] The way to do it is Bidenomics.

[Chorus] Yay! Bidenomics! Yay!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

as long as you don't need food, protection from the elements, or warmth, Bidenomics works for you.

pile of currency begins cheering

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every time Krugman opens his yap I experience the rage all over again from his gaslighting during Bernie's first run that was an obvious ploy for a position in Clinton's cabinet (that he probably would have got if she won). As bad as the Bond villain that was Steve Mnuchin was, I think there's a solid argument that Krugman could and would do much more damage as Treasury Secretary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

no more half measures walter

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their whole thing is line go up but they can't even do that and are coping by just drawing scribbles on walls with crayons

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

"People murdered by Nazis ex Jews, LGBT, Leftists, Political Opponents, and the Disabled."

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

The GDP still looks really weird though (excluding money, nationality, assets and used cars).

load more comments
view more: next ›