this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
484 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2701 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 200 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Jordan Sather, a prominent promoter of the QAnon conspiracy theory, suggested that Swift’s life had been orchestrated as part of a sinister plot to encourage her fans to vote.

There a few other people quoted in there but it's all the same sinister plan they are proposing: The psyop is encouraging people to vote.

Republicans see large voter turnout as a bad thing because they are less popular than they want you to think they are. This is not new, it's just a new target.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Swift’s life had been orchestrated as part of a sinister plot to encourage her fans to vote.

Reminds me of the time Republicans in some local election had sent out a mailer smearing the Dem candidate. There was a big box on one part of the card, in a large font against a dark background proclaiming that the Dem candidate wanted to "Educate and Transform you!"

Well, I thought, do your donors know you are campaigning for the Democrat?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think that’s deliberate language designed to get voters to distrust truth and facts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 181 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Better headline:

The Right will believe literally anything except reality because they don't want to accept they're unpopular.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Reminds me of the time GOP Senator Mark-Wayne Mullin shouted "I don't want reality!" In a senate hearing

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 122 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The right is free to have kid Rock or whatever loser they have on their side, do the same things Taylor is doing, if they're so concerned. Except all she's doing is encouraging people to vote, which as we all know is bad for Republicans

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're forgetting that if a woman does it its a psyop

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 102 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Qanon? Not a psyop. Fake electors? Not a psyop. Fake evidence of election fraud? Not a psyop. Inciting insurrection at the capital? Not a psyop.

Popular woman wants right to healthcare? PSYOP!!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Oh thank god. Republicans are gonna piss off the Swifties.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 11 months ago (4 children)

this may be the thing that topples the gop

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lazy projection. The Trump campaign was already literally part of Russian PsyOps a decade ago.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Exactly.

C'mon now, we all know the primary thrust of their attacks/defenses is always "I know you are, but what am I?". By far the most common. It's used like half the time.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The whole article could have just been this:

it remains unclear how encouraging people to vote can be construed as election interference.

But one of the weirdest things is how conservatives are totally obsessed with how many people she's dated. One of the tweets in the article says she "runs through men like water." Ok? Even if it were somehow unacceptable to date multiple people throughout the whole of your twenties, god forbid, exactly what in the fuck does it have to do with "election interference."

I love how every male conservative leader can be married 5 times while paying for abortions for their girlfriends, but regular dating is where they draw the line.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Right wingers are deranged. We need to get them out of government with a bit more fucking urgency americans.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (14 children)

It's because the GOP knows that more voters means they lose. Centrists don't exist. There's no middle ground between Ds and Rs anymore.

No one is 50/50 on Trump.

VOTE

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The only Swift conspiracy I believe is that she and the NFL fabricated her relationship with Travis Kelce to cross-pollinate the fan bases.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (8 children)

The NFL fabricating stories for views / clicks / likes?!?!

Never!!!

Cuts to Taylor at a football game

Cuts to demar Hamlin - tho he did die

Cuts to Josh Dobbs and his degree

Cuts to Jackson mahomes

Etc.

I firmly believe that the NFL absolutely drives a narrative, creates drama, has the referees keep games close for views and latches on to anything that makes news and drives viewers.

The games exist to only serve us ads... :/

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This the only political statement I needed to support Swift

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Swift is a force of good, as much as any insanely rich person can be. She alone may end up responsible for tens of thousands of young women registering to vote between now and election day. One of her Instagram posts drove 35,000 voter registrations. Republicans have every reason to fear the Swiftie factor.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. She's measured with it too. One of the reasons her sway is so strong imo, is she just saved it up for a long time. So when she finally asks a fan "hey could you do this one little thing for me?" it almost feels like "uh, yeah, I've known you my whole life Taylor, of course."

Which the fan doesn't "know her" per se, but between a musician and a huge fan, it definitely feels like you do. It's a personal relationship, a little different from most other fandoms. Music is just odd that way.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I would say that Princess Diana would be a comparison.

Personally, I like Swift because she has legs for days. I'll vote for that reason alone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sorry not a swift person but isnt she just saying to her fans, you should register to vote and vote because its importent? Wish psyops was that simple.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Also they're speaking as if their celebrities don't tell people to go out and vote republican.

Also what happened to the "free speech" crowd lol

[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Are they upset how so many people could yield so much influence to one person ?

And they want a dictator.

I'm so sick of Absolutists. They create monarchies, wealth gaps, and Spanish Inquisitions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So, Russian interference was a "hoax" (according to most of the radicalized right wing, the Enlightened Centrists and of course, a lot of the unhelpful left who seem to enjoy being useful idiots), but Taylor Swift is part of the Deep State or something?

XD XD

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 11 months ago

Lmao, even if it's true the actual complaint here is they're mad the Democrats did it too, only conservatives are allowed to run info ops during elections!

[–] [email protected] 36 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Why the right thinks Taylor Swift is a government PsyOp designed to swing the 2024 election

Because they're stupid, conspiracy-theory believing fucks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Republicans brains go burrrrrrr

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Just when I think conservatives can't get any dumber they always find a way. It's remarkable, really.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's because a lot of people want a confident leader.

They don't care if the confidence is because they know what they're doing. They just want the confidence.

So Republican politicians never admit they're wrong and make up ridiculous things because any answer works as long as their confident.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago (2 children)

TIL opinions+ talent + marketing = psyop.

Is every political campaign a psyop too?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago

Finally, my tax dollars are doing something useful.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The Democrat party can't even advertise when Biden does a good thing properly. You think they're smart and organised enough to run a sophisticated psyop like that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer even claimed that Swift’s entire Eras Tour was nothing more than “a Democrat Party Voter Registration drive

Yes, because the voter registration drive would only 100% register democrats or people who they know will vote democratic. No republicans/GOP voters could possibly get registered.

Well now it’s obvious - the only option is for the GOP to buy all of the tickets to Taylor Swift concerts, thus preventing democrats from being able to register to vote.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

The answer is simple, because reality and the truth almost never align with the goals of the right. So they invent these fantastical conspiracies to explain why the world is the way it is.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago

While I don't listen to her stuff intentionally, I do enjoy her tunes for the most part that I've heard. I also recognize her talent and influence.

I think it's really wonderful for her to encourage her fans to register to vote...

The more people who vote the harder it is to maintain minority rule.

[–] xerazal 20 points 11 months ago

Anything that hinders the GOP is a government PsyOp. Anything that helps the GOP is God's will.

Delusional fuckers.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Republicans are attacking Swift/Swifties? I need to buy more popcorn!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fools! How can they not see that Taylor Swift's tour is a secret op to install 5G towers all over the world that will make our penises fall off? Wake up, sheeple!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because they're running a PsyOp designed to swing the 2024 election to a victory for their dictator?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›