this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
743 points (98.4% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3952 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Iowa will not participate this summer in a federal program that gives $40 per month to each child in a low-income family to help with food costs while school is out, state officials have announced.

The state has notified the U.S. Department of Agriculture that it will not participate in the 2024 Summer Electronic Benefits Transfer for Children — or Summer EBT — program, the state’s Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Education said in a Friday news release.

“Federal COVID-era cash benefit programs are not sustainable and don’t provide long-term solutions for the issues impacting children and families. An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic,” Iowa Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds said in the news release.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

These clowns better be happy i am not a billionaire. I’d be sending a check to every damn household with kids in the state.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Billionaires don't spend their money. If they did, they wouldn't be billionaires.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

She's right all those small subsidies aren't going to fix anything it's just going to complicate the system. Minimum wage should be raised

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

UBI would be great for those who are working or not.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

if you're a Conservative, little kids just don't work hard enough to deserve food

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

$120m is all you need to give that same $40 to literally everyone in her state each month.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Article says that the program is estimated to cost Iowa $2,2 million, the rest covered on a federal level.

They can't find 2,2 million.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Loading them up on a bunch of HFCS from those Iowa corn fields will be great for them though I'm sure...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Oh, but it is. It's proven in the 12th economy of the world, why one state of the first economy of the world couldn't sustain it?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (4 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Iowa will not participate this summer in a federal program that gives $40 per month to each child in a low-income family to help with food costs while school is out, state officials have announced.

“Federal COVID-era cash benefit programs are not sustainable and don’t provide long-term solutions for the issues impacting children and families.

An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic,” Iowa Republican Gov.

Some state lawmakers, including Democratic Sen. Izaah Knox of Des Moines, quickly voiced their opposition to the decision.

“It’s extremely disappointing that the Reynolds administration is planning to reject federal money that could put food on the table for hungry Iowa kids,” Knox said in a statement.

States, territories and eligible tribal nations have until Jan. 1 to notify the Department of Agriculture of their intent to participate in the program this summer.


The original article contains 520 words, the summary contains 149 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

extremely disappointing

Honestly, I don't get this. Call a spade a spade. Use words like "absolutely unconscionable". Use "inexcusable". Use words that get the gravity across of just how asinine and ABSOLUTELY deadly this will be. Mark my words, despite whatever safety nets exist in the state of IA, kids will starve to death because of this. Make a statement saying EXACTLY that, and point out that the blood will be on Governor Reynolds' hands.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Another example of "once they're out of the womb, fuck 'em". Disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Iowa is a barren field devoid of intellectualism so OF COURSE the election hinges on it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Quick, somebody call "Moms for Liberty" and get this fixed!

oh....

I see. Right. OK then, never mind.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

What a poverty state, I’d he embarrassed if I lived in a place that had so many poors or so little money that that’s not affordable

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Too bad those kids aren't Fetuses. Then Republicans might actually CARE about them!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

You know what else does nothing for kids? Kim Reynolds. She’s, an arrogant, hypocritical, and ignorant douche baby.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

What's not sustainable is having a class of people that exist as leaches, doing no actual productive work but instead claiming authority and causing/enforcing inequality.

Get a real job bitch!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›