this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
289 points (99.0% liked)

politics

18645 readers
3639 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 90 points 7 months ago

“I’m convinced there are two people Putin pays; Rorabacher and Trump.” - future Speaker of the house Kevin McCarthy in 2016

“Shhh! STFU!” - then-current Speaker of the House Paul Ryan

[–] [email protected] 59 points 7 months ago

compromised? JFC, they tried to overthrow the fucking government itself.. they're enemies outright..

[–] [email protected] 56 points 7 months ago

Bruh. It’s obvious.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Does the person blackmailing them have a name very similar to a popular Canadian dish made with french fries?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

I think it's funny that both Trump and Putin have names that are euphemisms for farting

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Btw, I know it's recognized as a Canadian dish, and Canada likes to flex it, but just wanted to say in passing, it's a Quebec dish!

[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago (3 children)

At the risk of showing my ignorance, isnt Quebec in Canada?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Currently, but they keep trying.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

is it like a texas secession thing or a legitimate thing?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

As far as I can tell, somewhere between the two.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

well to anyone personally connected to the issue, Im sorry if I treated it lightly

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

It is but it’s pronounced with an accent.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A bunch of dumb fucks wanted to split a while back, had a referendum that almost passed Brexit style. it's been pretty moot since but there are a lot of conservative idiots in Quebec, like Texas.

The only key difference is Quebec has the largest power company and a huge hydroelectric power source, so we've got that going for us, which is nice..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If your electrical system continues working when it's both cold and hot, then you're miles ahead of Texas!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

We were born in the cold, molded by it. I didn't see grass until I was already a man and global warming removed winters completely.

Jokes aside it breaks pretty often because of bad weather, but gets repaired within a few hours.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

It’s kind of a Texas situation, except they treat it as more than a political motto.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

From my experience they are in Old Orchard Beach

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

it's a Quebec dish!

Right so... Canadian.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I mean sure, as much a Louisiana or southern cooking is from "the US". You wouldn't say "US hot sauce" lol.

Go to BC and your poutine will be shit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Poutine is shit anywhere outside of Quebec but it doesn't change the fact that Quebec is in Canada which makes it Canadian.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean sure? It's a north american dish too at that point. And it's still not wrong to say poutine isn't from all of Canada, it's from one place where people are Canadian lmao.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You're just arguing semantics now which makes you look like an idiot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Literally how I started this whole thing.

"Semantics, but it's from Quebec".

Then yall went on long rants to tell me I'm wrong. If yall don't think you look like idiots arguing semantics...keep angrily downvoting all my comments too, makes you look real subjective.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But why even argue semantics? Because you like the attention even if it's negative?

So childish.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I was actually adding to the comment. Youre the one who is solely arguing semantic. Does that mean you want the negative attention? That doesn't make sense.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

We can tell by the name.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

Quebecers becoming Ontarions. That's fucked. Stop it now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Unlikely, this is more of the domestic and close ally variety e.g. Epstein's handlers/killers, or of that same caliber. The kind of people who can waive off, or prevent, an FBI counterintelligence operation from getting in the way...

[–] [email protected] 55 points 7 months ago

Until lobbying is eliminated and campaign finance severely overhauled, assume they're all compromised. It's just a matter of who they're bought and paid for.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 7 months ago (1 children)

US: We could easily destroy Russia in traditional warfare, we have the best weapons, we will never stop fighting them

Russia: Here’s a suitcase full of money

US: Oh, I love those! Never mind, do whatever you want

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I read this in Ryan George's voice.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Producer Guy: "Sounds like destroying a democracy from the inside is going to be incredibly difficult." Writer Guy: "Actually it's gonna be super easy. Barely an inconvenience." Producer Guy: "Oh, really!" Writer Guy: holds up a suitcase full of money

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Oh, man. I would love to watch that! Wow wow wow wow wow.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 7 months ago

For many of these politicians, based on their actions, they're compromised, evil, stupid or insane. Quite possibly all the above.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Spit it out then Mr Burchett! Didn't you take an oath to protect the country?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Only from progress

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

Given how little money it takes to sway the politicians votes I'm amazed it has taken this long

I'm still all for crowd funding the buying of politicians votes at this point. The politician will think it's some private benefactor or multinational patrolling them.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

some fellow members have been compromised.

You don't say?!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Well, who are they?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I wonder when Putin will release the videos he has on Trump ;-)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

The video can be used against his children. So I doubt it will go out any time soon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Never. Putin doesn't need the videos he has on Trump. Trump isn't a victim of kompromat; he's a fanboi. He's betraying American democracy and doing Putin's bidding simply because he wants to, not because he's being coerced to!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

“Absolutely. And other powers. It doesn’t have to be foreign powers.”

NSA has entered the chat.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I trust the NSA a lot more than, for example, the Koch brothers, or some nameless billionaire none of us have heard of.

I rich dick can do more damage than a bunch of government employees. Giant conspiracies just don’t exist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

The Koch bros do fund some decent pbs shows.