this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
230 points (89.9% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4585 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 81 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The fact that he convinced election officials in seven states by a phone call he was a part of to mail in forged elector certificates that falsely claimed he won the election?

I feel like that's more damning than anything else , that that's more of a reason to bar him from election, since he very clearly committed election fraud and organized a conspiracy to commit election fraud.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Hurry the fuck up and get him out. Disqualify him.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

You misspelled ‘trebuchet’.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Okay, thanks for nothing Illinois elections officer.

  • cites "absolutely damning" evidence
  • this ironclad evidence is a tweet, already available to everyone. it is not new in any way.
  • also says the elections board shouldn't be allowed to remove trump from the ballot, insisting that it be litigated.

K

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

Republicans gonna repub.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (2 children)

But the officer, retired Republican judge Clark Erickson, determined that the elections board has no power to remove Trump from the ballot, and should therefore drop the case, saying that the the issue must be decided in the courts.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

retired Republican judge Clark Erickson, determined that the elections board has no power

A Republican who believes a regulatory board has no power? Gee, what a novelty!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

I suppose either way, it will be decided by the courts.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

Clickbait garbage.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The only way Trump is going to win Illinois is if the Democratic Party is removed from the Presidential ballot.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Not even then, I don't think. I'd sooner write-in Vermin Supreme, as would most people in Chicago. Luckily (?), the city is the reason why Illinois is blue. Go an hour away in any direction and you're in enemy territory - but an entire town out there has fewer people in it than there are people living on my block. So, it works out.

You hear that, mom? Go fuck yourself.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I’d sooner write-in Vermin Supreme, as would most people in Chicago.

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vermin_Supreme#2020:

Supreme ran again for president in 2020, this time as a Libertarian. This marked the first time that Supreme ran a "legitimate" campaign, focusing on real rather than satirical issues and using the slogan "In On The Joke". While Supreme continued to use satirical humor, he focused more on legitimate political issues. He called for ending foreign wars and voiced support for pardoning non-violent drug offenders, ending the war on drugs, and reducing incarceration, which he called his top priority. On the COVID-19 pandemic, Supreme criticized President Donald Trump, arguing that he should have paid better attention to the virus and have made testing more widely available. He satirically promised to make COVID-19 illegal and, in a play on his campaign promise to go back in time and "kill baby Hitler," vowed to go back in time and "kill baby COVID." He facetiously pledged to create "COVID-19 free zones" because "they work so well for things like guns and drugs."

Legitimately a better choice than Biden, let alone Trump. (Aside from the third-party-spoiler-effect, of course. He's apparently running as a Democrat this year, so luckily we don't have to worry about that this time.)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

I didn't see mention of any new evidence, just that his opinion was the existing evidence was "absolutely damning".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

There's really no point ruling one way or another until the Supreme Court has it's say.