I'm guessing this game is just trending in general but I literally found out about the assassination attempt when I saw a torrent site put this on freeleech like an hour after the news.
I know this is nitpicking but when you have Trump money, filing your taxes wrong to your significant benefit should earn this kind of derision. The problem is that it never does unless it's in some way convenient for enough other people who benefit from filing their taxes wrong.
I do agree with the sentiment that in the real world a crime against humanity is infinitely more meaningful than a felony and there's a reason that there's less focus on the Trump administration's crimes against humanity.
As an aging millennial who still does not use emojis, the thumbs up feels like the most sarcastic of all emojis to me and when I get one I feel like I should be personally offended.
Yeah, that's almost definitely off a teleprompter.
It took me like a full minute to piece together that Christopher might be making a bad take (it is journalistic malpractice for the NYT to print this) here and not a good take (it is journalistic malpractice for the NYT to hold off on printing this until eight visits in).
I was thinking the same thing, is there a video? If it's legit this might be the most well-constructed thought I've ever seen from him. My first thought was that he read it off a teleprompter, and I guess maybe, but after thinking about it a bit more it is a little hard for me to picture a lackey feeding this material into a script.
It's probably just that most people speak more clearly when it's their area of expertise (trashing haters and losers).
IDF Freed 4 Hostages While Killing 64 Children
Well that sucks. Thanks for the answer.
Does anyone know if this has a proprietary license?
Wind Is Not a Distribution
There you have it, the people want Hillary.
I'm curious though, how often does election polling have a named democrat ahead of an "unnamed democrat" option? Has that actually happened any time in recent history? Like obviously registered voters are going to pick "someone else" here if you don't name who "someone else" is.
I know you've typed this out as a joke but writing it this way actually helps me conceptualize why someone would find Trump appealing.