I still feel bad about when I caught a ban for trying to joke with you on there.
christian
Oh shit, are you in the Dearborn area too? One of the flyers we got in the mail was like this:
It was like a full ten seconds before it hit me that they really shouldn't be dumb enough to send this and it's possible it was mailed by a Trump association, and another minute before I decided being mailed by a GOP affiliate was actually the more likely case. Looked up the super PAC listed on the other side and it's a Trump-linked PAC.
As someone who does not want Trump to be president, it's at least relieving to know how easy it will be for the democrats to counter these dirty tricks. All they need to do is have their candidate make a clear public statement about what she finds wrong with this.
It does kind of upset me that you texted the republicans back the thing they wanted to hear though. I get that the dems deserve every bit of the scorn, but the republicans don't deserve a drop of the satisfaction.
Unless you've left something out, I feel like you're being unfair to the instructor here by assuming malice for giving oral exams. Have you voiced this concern with her? My reaction is that this instructor is putting enormously more effort into her students than she's being paid to, I'm not sure you realize how much more of a time investment that is.
I've had students come to me about test anxiety and if I trust that they have a decent understanding then I'll offer an option to test orally instead. A lot of students do much better with oral exams. It allows me to say okay, you can't answer this particular question, but I can probe adjacent things to give partial credit. I can see you do have some understanding of what the question is meant to test for, I realize that this specific detail is tripping you up and you would do fine with a question that didn't involve that one hiccup. With a written exam, I'm just grading on how well you answer the one question. It's not reasonable to take stabs at how much better you might do with a slightly different question, because that would be massively influenced by the biases of what I'm expecting out of you before the exam starts - it's hard for that not to end up at better grades for students I like more. I can't look beyond how well the steps you've written on the paper lead towards answering the question you were given.
In a better world I would offer them for everyone, but it's a massive time investment. I'm reluctant to make that offer unless I already have some confidence they're decent with the material, because if I give an oral exam and they're struggling it might be hard for me to not leak frustration with having two hours of my time burned for no benefit, and if they read that on me it won't help with test anxiety and won't be better for anyone.
Seriously, just start a dialogue with her about this in private.
That's why you open a window with less embarrassing porn and leave it running in the background.
I don't know if this counts, but I recently made a mastodon account for my original screenplay ideas and need some opinions on all of these: link
Is that a parody account
I fooled you guys, I wasn't actually confident at all.
Not opening the article, but I'm pretty confident this is a real quote that was actually said and not a reference to something I'm not familiar with.
It's still much worse than what you've written here! You used the word "while" when the word "because" is much more accurate.
Everyone is making this out to be a terrible thing for a candidate to say but I've dreamed my whole life about having an honest politician in this country.
I thought your post said compress with them and I was like what the hell does that even mean.
I did my part, I yelled at the truck driver.