christian

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

I did my part, I yelled at the truck driver.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I still feel bad about when I caught a ban for trying to joke with you on there.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Oh shit, are you in the Dearborn area too? One of the flyers we got in the mail was like this:

It was like a full ten seconds before it hit me that they really shouldn't be dumb enough to send this and it's possible it was mailed by a Trump association, and another minute before I decided being mailed by a GOP affiliate was actually the more likely case. Looked up the super PAC listed on the other side and it's a Trump-linked PAC.

As someone who does not want Trump to be president, it's at least relieving to know how easy it will be for the democrats to counter these dirty tricks. All they need to do is have their candidate make a clear public statement about what she finds wrong with this.

It does kind of upset me that you texted the republicans back the thing they wanted to hear though. I get that the dems deserve every bit of the scorn, but the republicans don't deserve a drop of the satisfaction.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Unless you've left something out, I feel like you're being unfair to the instructor here by assuming malice for giving oral exams. Have you voiced this concern with her? My reaction is that this instructor is putting enormously more effort into her students than she's being paid to, I'm not sure you realize how much more of a time investment that is.

I've had students come to me about test anxiety and if I trust that they have a decent understanding then I'll offer an option to test orally instead. A lot of students do much better with oral exams. It allows me to say okay, you can't answer this particular question, but I can probe adjacent things to give partial credit. I can see you do have some understanding of what the question is meant to test for, I realize that this specific detail is tripping you up and you would do fine with a question that didn't involve that one hiccup. With a written exam, I'm just grading on how well you answer the one question. It's not reasonable to take stabs at how much better you might do with a slightly different question, because that would be massively influenced by the biases of what I'm expecting out of you before the exam starts - it's hard for that not to end up at better grades for students I like more. I can't look beyond how well the steps you've written on the paper lead towards answering the question you were given.

In a better world I would offer them for everyone, but it's a massive time investment. I'm reluctant to make that offer unless I already have some confidence they're decent with the material, because if I give an oral exam and they're struggling it might be hard for me to not leak frustration with having two hours of my time burned for no benefit, and if they read that on me it won't help with test anxiety and won't be better for anyone.

Seriously, just start a dialogue with her about this in private.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

That's why you open a window with less embarrassing porn and leave it running in the background.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know if this counts, but I recently made a mastodon account for my original screenplay ideas and need some opinions on all of these: link

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Is that a parody account

 

Actually, wait, she changed her mind and now says we can get a third cat, but only if we keep it outdoors. Anyway, our current cats are Norwegian forest cats so don't usually vote in American elections.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I fooled you guys, I wasn't actually confident at all.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not opening the article, but I'm pretty confident this is a real quote that was actually said and not a reference to something I'm not familiar with.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago

It's still much worse than what you've written here! You used the word "while" when the word "because" is much more accurate.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everyone is making this out to be a terrible thing for a candidate to say but I've dreamed my whole life about having an honest politician in this country.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought your post said compress with them and I was like what the hell does that even mean.

 

I am absolutely astonished. How does a person even make this connection? I cannot for the life of me imagine being able to come up with this from watching the debate.

 

Someone please help me articulate why this is somehow the funniest thing I have seen all day.

 

Yo-Kai Watch 3 post!

I'm trying to milk the remaining week out of one of my favorite games before Nintendo shuts down all the 3DS online stuff and I won't get to battle online anymore. The decent English-language sites for this game went down a while ago, so I tried using google auto-translate on the Japanese one.

This stood out to me because the English translators called this guy "Flash T. Cash" and I'm in shock at how much better his name is when just using google autotranslate: link

He's one of the 'Merican yo-kai, who comes from the faraway country of BBQ. (It's possible that the Japanese name for that nation doesn't translate to BBQ either.)

 

Oxman, for her part, wasn’t sure what to make of her husband’s chivalrous tweeting, which had drawn even more attention to the allegations. (Through Ackman’s spokesperson, she declined to comment for this story.) Ackman wrote on X that the pressure from the Business Insider stories “could have literally killed her” and that he had seen others commit suicide in similar circumstances. “She was in a pretty dark place,” Ackman told me, adding that he tried to nudge her toward finding a silver lining: “I’m like, ‘Look, you didn’t do anything wrong; we’ll get this fixed,’ and ‘Actually, the more negative press, the -better. Once we turn this around, it’ll be good for your company.’” He wasn’t sure the pitch had landed —

wait for it...

“There were times when she said, ‘Please don’t tweet anymore’” — but he defended himself by pointing to memes online suggesting he had become a hero to wives everywhere. “There’s a meme going around that apparently I’m causing a lot of marriages to have trouble,” Ackman said. “Like this one where a husband emails his wife, ‘Honey, I did the dishes.’ And she’s like, ‘Big fucking deal. Did you see what Ackman’s doing for his wife?’”

From this nymag.com article.

 

But in the week before the all-important caucuses, Scott Wagner, the recently installed head of the super PAC, was doing something that aides found puzzling: He was literally doing a puzzle.

In the headquarters of Never Back Down in West Des Moines, Iowa, Wagner was, according to some of his staff, spending a significant amount of time in the precious final few days constructing a peaceful 1,000-piece jigsaw puzzle of a landscape.

In a photo taken on Jan. 9, shared with NBC News by a Never Back Down team member, others in the room were hunched over their laptops.

“Staffers are putting their dedication and devotion to electing Gov. DeSantis and they come in and the CEO, the chairman of the organization, is sitting there working on a puzzle for hours,” said a Never Back Down staffer who was there.

Another Never Back Down staffer also said Wagner worked on it for “hours” in the week before Iowa.

In a comment to NBC News, Wagner noted that the “office puzzle” was “there when we arrived” and “became a sense of pride for the entire team and everyone chipped in a few minutes a piece to get it done.”

sources: original article, puzzle id

 

I found this here and have verified the accuracy by copy-pasting into google translate myself.

My question is, is this discrepancy due directly to an intentional decision to translate differently, or is it because google translate has been trained on news articles that have been manually translated for English-speaking audiences?

(To be clear, both paragraphs should involve one person kicking another in the nuts, unless I'm missing something.)

 

On Israeli efforts to minimize civilian casualties, NSC's John Kirby says: "We have seen some indications that there are there are efforts being applied in certain scenarios to try to minimize, but I don't want to overstate that."

Bet everyone who was getting all worked up over the bombing campaign feels pretty silly right now.

 

The captain was responding to a robbery inside the Crenshaw Mall which took place on April 15th, 2017, the department reports, during which time Lozano and fellow former Officer Eric Mitchell were parked in their squad car less than 200 yards away, playing Pokémon GO. Court documents reveal that the officers then drove away from the scene of the robbery in pursuit of Snorlax and Togetic.

“There was a Larvitar earlier, when we first got out,” one officer can be heard to say while parked in the new footage, and later, “It’s nice to have more Pokéballs, and the potions.”

view more: next ›