gnuhaut

If you install (well more like unpack) Firefox from the official binary tarball, that will update itself.

Ah verstehe. Ja wenn man eh nen Takt früher fährt, kommt das evtl. dann noch dazu, wobei man das zu den Unwägbarkeiten zählen könnte, weswegen man ja eh schon einen Takt früher fährt. Ich würde deswegen jetzt mein Verhalten jetzt nicht so ändern, und trotzdem nur einen Takt früher nehmen, wenn's wichtig ist.

Ich hab mal drüber nachgedacht: Also, wenn die S-Bahnen jetzt nicht mitunter zwei Minuten zu früh fahren würden, würde auf der verstopften Stammstrecke glaube ich hin und wieder ein Slot ungenutzt bleiben, was dann zu chronischer Verspätung bei sehr vielen S-Bahnen führen würde. Das würde dann vermutlich deutliche mehr Passagiere betreffen, als die eher vernachlässigbare Zahl, die ihren Anschluss verpassen, weil die S-Bahn zwei Minuten zu früh dran war. Davon profitieren alle anderen. Und sogar die Leute, die deswegen den Anschluss verpassen, werden vermutlich regelmäßig davon profitieren, wenn zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt die S-Bahn weniger Verspätung hat wegen dem System.

Ist wahrscheinlich tatsächlich "besser" irgendwie, weil die meisten Fahrgäste wahrscheinlich auch schon zwei Minuten früher da sind, aber ja, viele (die meisten?) S-Bahnen sind 20-Minuten-Takt. Ich wäre schon angepisst, wenn meine Verbindung nicht klappt, weil die S-Bahn zu früh da ist. Wobei wie oft das tatsächlich vorkommt dann in der Praxis, ist vielleicht nicht so das Problem wenn man das mit anderen Sachen vergleicht. Verstehe auch nicht, wie du auf zwei Takte eher kommst. Das würde doch höchsten einen Takt Verspätung bedeuten.

Schließe mich der Empfehlung an. Die Rezepte sind meistens einfach und funktionieren immer gut. Es sind ein paar Grundlagenkapitel dabei mit Erklärungen. Hat fast die komplette bayerische Küche drin, ist also auch gut als Nachschlagewerk. Das Teil ist an einer Haushaltsschule entstanden und gibt's schon ewig, das ist erprobt.

Wait do you reply to everyone using the term Zionist with that? Because that's some random tangent if I've ever seen one, triggered by a single word. Good derailing tactic though, you completely changed the subject.

I'm not even sure what your point is. Are you confused about what Zionism is? Because that's funny for a Zionist to be confused about. It means you support the existence of a Jewish-supremacist state, and it's a 19th century nationalist idea from Europe. So whatever you're on about is irrelevant. I'm calling you a Zionist, since you clearly support Israel or you wouldn't be taking the time to spread incorrect bullshit in defense of the IDF here.

Maybe you're confused about my comment. Let me explain. You said:

So the IDF controls the border between Gaza and Egypt? You should let Egypt know their border isn’t sovereign anymore.

Egypt controls Egypt's side of the border. Israel controls the Gaza side, what with them occupying it. Since that should be pretty obvious, it sounds like you think Egypt, in order to be sovereign, needs to control both sides the border, i.e. invade Gaza.

Which is funny to me, because that obviously defeats the whole purpose of a border. So I'm imaging you as a person who thinks the whole point of a border is that both sides should be controlled by the same state, since that's how Israel does it, and you being a Zionist, you think that's the normal way a border works. So "Zionist logic". This is a funny thought, a person so brainwashed they don't understand that borders are not like a checkpoint between Israel and the West Bank. There, you made me explain the joke.

Yes they do. Even if they didn't that excuses nothing about what Israel is doing.

And I guess by your Zionist logic no country has any sovereignty if anybody but themselves controls both sides of the border, which checks out since that's also how Israel seems to think borders work.

Tons. This on is from Oct 30 in The Nation:

The German state’s show of support has led to an outright banning of most pro-Palestine protests. [...]

The reasons for the bans seemed unambiguous: German police said that there was an “imminent danger” that the assemblies will result in “inciting, anti-Semitic slogans,” as well as “glorification of violence.”

Preemptively. Because antisemitism and "glorification of violence" might occur. And by antisemitism they mean things like this:

On October 13, Berlin police declared uttering the slogan “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” forbidden and indictable. That same day, Berlin’s education senator, Katharina Günther-Wünsch, sent a letter to all Berlin school principals offering them the option to ban students from wearing “pro-Palestinian symbols such as the keffiyeh.” “Any act or expression of opinion that can be understood as advocacy or approval of the attacks against Israel,” she wrote, “constitutes a threat to school peace and is prohibited.”

Yeah no the other poster is correct, I meant Ubuntu doesn't do feature updates after release. You seem worried about something that's quite unlikely to happen (breakage introduced from minimal patches), while delaying security fixes. And I assume the vast majority of updates are security fixes.

And I also think you're being rude in this whole thread.

Ubuntu only does security updates, no? So that seems like a bad idea.

If you still want to do that, I guess you'd probably need to run your own package mirror, update that on Monday, and then point all the machines to use that in the sources.list and run unattended-upgrades on different days of the week.

Check again what the parent poster said:

As long as they are not violent they can protest all day long.

Which is what I replied to, and which is clearly not true, they ban nonviolent protests all the time.

What you're saying is absolute horseshit.

They banned many many protests in Germany (before they happened, at the permit phase). The excuse the authorities give is usually vague security concerns, and they always argue that something antisemitic or glorifying violence might be said. And they explictly define any fundamental critique of Israel as antisemitism and any positive mention or symbol of any armed resistance group as glorifying violence, but only for pro-Palestinian groups. You can show support for the IDF as much as you like, in fact providing not just symbolic support, but support in the form of actual lethal weapons is facilitated at the highest levels of the state. That is legal and encouraged. Saying "Palestine will be free." gets you detained.

Unironisch die Meinung auf r/worldnews