3
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago

Biden also reportedly stressed that he was apologetic for his debate performance but told supporters it was "critical" to beat Trump in November. Polling has shown that the candidates are neck and neck, even after Thursday's debate in which Biden's demeanor sparked concern among Democrats.

One of the few things I agree with Biden on...

Beating trump is the most important thing, and Biden looks like he might not be up to it.

He just refuses to step aside, because it's not about beating trump to him, it's about him beating trump.

And it's insane to put it on an 81 year that keeps sundowning.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Aside from stepping aside, which is risky let's all admit - though risky is also staying in - I jokingly, though somewhat firmly believe, that all Biden has to do to see his ratings spike and completely manipulate people is go fucking bananas. Just lean hard into Dark Brandon. Campaign like a motherfucker. Throw out shots left, right, and center. Hop on a couple big stages full energy for two hours.

Basically: All his campaign has to do is twist the narrative. It'd probably work too, though having the idea and accomplishing it are two entirely different monsters. Biden may not be up to acting this piece well enough to sell it. If he did though, I feel he'd come out the other side in a stronger position.

Due to my own biases, I can't think of anyone else who'd be able to go up against a name like Trump. He won't step on anymore debate stages. He won't play fair. Recognition is, I think, very important right now.

[-] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Aside from stepping aside, which is risky let’s all admit

The last Dem incumbent with approval similar to Biden's was Jimmy Carter...

Howd his second term go again?

People keep forgetting that Biden is historically unpopular, he's not a normal incumbent, he's one no one wants 4 more years of.

We just don't want 4 more years of trump either.

So the safe bet is running someone Dem voters want.

Recognition is, I think, very important right now.

And every American will know Biden's replacements name in 48 hours of being named...

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

WHO do voters want?

People keep saying to run someone.

Who??

Also, why the fuck do we always start to come together and then find a reason to shit all over ourselves? I'm hard left leaning but like fuck man, it's hard being covered in verbal shit all the time from all the people that seem so intent on arguing against just coming together. The Republicans can do it, and they're fucking imbeciles...

...who keep winning!

[-] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

WHO do voters want?

Not trump. And not Biden...

People keep acting like Dem voters are asking for a perfect candidate, they're not.

Whitimer is probably the most likely to get tapped and still win, but AOC would make the 2024 election look like a Harlem Globetrotters game. The DNC just won't pick a progressive

Also, why the fuck do we always start to come together and then find a reason to shit all over ourselves?

Because when we "come together" it's always progressives holding their noses, moderates getting exactly what they want, and Dem voters not liking what the moderate did once we put them in power.

Look at Obama, Hillary did the whole PUMA thing, but with a progressive candidate, the moderate wing just isn't fucking needed.

The problem is party leadership are all moderates, and only a tiny slice of Dem voters are.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

The problem is party leadership are all moderates, and only a tiny slice of Dem voters are.

Fifty-two percent of Democratic voters are moderates. Only 12% are progressive. You don't help your argument by making statistics up out of thin air.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

You don't have to self-id as a progressive to support progressive policies.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

That has nothing to do with my comment or the comment I responded to.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The commenter above imo didn't mean to talk about self-id when they said or implied something like "most (dem) voters are progressive." They imo meant progressive policies are broadly popular.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

Well then if they meant something different than what they said, they should have said something different in the first place. A majority of Democrats are moderates, full stop. The popularity of progressive policies is irrelevant.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

You had me up to this sentence:

The popularity of progressive policies is irrelevant.

The popularity of progressive policies is the only relevant concern. It's self-id that is irrelevant.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

Well would you look at that. It's not self identification:

Pew Research Center’s new political typology provides a road map to today’s fractured political landscape. It segments the public into nine distinct groups, based on an analysis of their attitudes and values.

It's identity based on attitudes and values.

I repeat, the popularity of progressive policies has nothing to do with this conversation. Move along.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's the same thing.

In my own mind I am a center of the road moderate too.

Ask me the right questions and my answers will sound decidedly moderate.

The current late stage capitalist government is the extremist that must be stopped.

Get lost.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

The DNC does not decide if AOC runs or not, just like they couldn't choose whether Bernie ran or not. Otherwise they would have.

AOC decides if AOC runs.

I don't share your optimism that she would sweep though, I think she'd come across as too young to a lot of voters. I'm hoping she picks up a Senate seat soon, and then runs from that in the future. I think it'll put her in a better position to win.

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
3 points (51.3% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3684 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS