this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
469 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2530 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 130 points 1 month ago (5 children)

It seems CNN did excellent research in tying Mark Robinson to minisoldr.

And this article is very revealing, and shows how gross, sick this individual is. There's something really wrong with him.

The article is disturbing - and it's worth noting that CNN has withheld more evidence that is evidently much more disturbing. Goodness....

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep.

If he had something like a normal healthy interest in sex, even with a bit of a kink, nobody would care.

Announcing that you're a Nazi and pro-slavery is the problem here.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's also the hypocrisy. He's into porn with trans women.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

The majority of porn with trans women is aggressively fetishized and dog-whistley to blatantly transphobic. I’m honestly not surprised that someone who consumes it is a transphobe.

[–] solsangraal 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

being in NC, i'm glad this came out before the election. but being in NC, i can tell you: the people who need to read the article most, won't

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thankfully Josh Stein seems to be well-positioned to win this one... as long as everybody gets up off their ass and votes

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Well that is fucking depressing. Hopefully some of the information spreads to them via cultural osmosis I guess.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

It’s really a testament to trump that this will not be the end of this disgusting bastard’s political career. Heck it may even help him.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

They shared the report with other orgs, for instance The Guardian posted other elements.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would they withhold anything?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

They allude in the article it's because it was too fucking gross to publish

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Still, they should probably publish it on some leaks outlet. They don't have to publish every detail on their articles, but still, they should probably provide a way for others to read it if they so wish.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

I saw that. I guess it would just be gratuitous.