this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
303 points (95.5% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3548 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump allies, including Tucker Carlson and Laura Loomer, are accusing Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of orchestrating a “coup” against Trump’s agenda by scheduling early Senate GOP leadership elections.

Carlson, on social media, urged his followers to support Florida Senator Rick Scott as the only candidate aligned with Trump, warning that other candidates oppose Trump’s policies.

Loomer criticized Republicans for not addressing McConnell’s move sooner, suggesting that calls for party "unity" have enabled this alleged attempt to undermine Trump’s incoming administration.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stoy 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This made me think about a possible third term for Trump, this is without changing the rules.

Trump completes his next term, then campaigns again, this time for vice president, with a puppet as a running mate.

The puppet will, shortly after taking office, declare to step down for health reasons and Trump will be president again.

There is as far as I know, no rule preventing this.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The Vice President must be eligible to be president. Obama is not eligible for the VP position.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Representative Trump could make it work though.

The reality, however, is that they'll just ignore the Constitution.

[–] stoy 11 points 1 week ago

Huh, I did not know that, thanks!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

This is not quite accurate. The vice president must be eligible to be the President, not to be elected President. The 22nd amendment has some very specific language.

"No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once."

It prevents someone from being elected President, but does not make the person ineligible to be the President since it only restricts that one method of gaining the office. A person can definitely become President through succession even if they have served their full two terms already...at least by the constitution as written.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You can’t be vice president if you’re not eligible to be president, it’s in the constitution. 12th amendment.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

The Supreme Court will rule that nobody has standing to bring a challenge based on the 12th Amendment. Kind of like what they did to the Emoluments Clause.

[–] stoy 6 points 1 week ago

The reason I made my comment was due to this paper:

https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/1012/

I hope I am wrong or that we won't have to find out....

[–] stoy 3 points 1 week ago

Interesting, thank you!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Also known as the Medwedew move. But I doubt Trump will manage one full term, let alone two.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

If they have control of the house, Supreme Court, senate, and presidency then they can just change laws or ratify whatever they want including term limits for president. That’s the way I would see if going.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

He's 78 and displaying moderate dementia symptoms. I wouldn't worry about a third term.