this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
144 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15914 readers
17 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 48 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Lowest unemployment since the 60s

Yeah but the Biden administration is actually fighting against that. That was totally accidental and had nothing to do with Biden.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Also, and I will shout this out forever, they got this number by omitting everyone who has been unemployed for more than a few months or stopped looking for work. Just full-on brump shit, and these dumbasses eat it up

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah. I bet the largest reduction in the number of people on unemployment happened when they stopped extending it for COVID.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 months ago

And unemployment doesn't mean shit when wages aren't even high enough to survive on. Great, he's maximized the number of people who are both working and can't afford rent.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Isnt it also partially due to legalising child labour?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago

IIRC it's mostly just lying. The stats don't include anyone who's unemployed but not looking for work.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I don't know if that one is really on Biden though. The Child labour thing seems to be a Republican-only idea for now, but I'm sure that by 2028, Democrats are going to look at deep-red states electing freaks who support child labour and conclude that Democrats must also support it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

I'd still blame Biden. If he was actually anti child labor he'd be assassinating the people doing it, but instead the only extrajudicial killings he does is killing "terrorists"

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

If the Republicans wanted to make 10 year olds eligible to work in the mines, the Dems would compromise and make 14 year olds the minimum then strut around like it was a victory.