The Rock.
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
Yep. The guy has a crapload of roles, from silly to more action-hero serious. I’d also toss Bautista out there, he’s pretty good and has had a good variety of roles, but Johnson wins I think just by having way more screen time.
Johnson "wins" by not being as good an actor as Bautista.
To be the heir of Arnold you must be a bit cheesy
Drax not cheesy enough? I guess he’s just written that way.
I can see that.
Dwayne Johnson has definitely improved as an actor. I thought he was absolutely shit in The Mummy Returns but great in the more recent Jumanji reboots.
Dave Bautista mirrors Arnold Schwarzenegger's path from sports to cinema, where he got action movie roles because of his physique. And like Schwarzenegger, Bautista's transition into diverse acting roles showcases his versatility beyond that.
Except Bautista is actually a very good actor and, for all I enjoyed a lot of Arnie's films, Schwarzenegger is not.
You go to hell! You go to hell and you die!
Does he take leading roles, or is he more of a supporting guy? Arnie was usually the protagonist (or antagonist in Terminator).
Bautista has been great in every role I've seen him in.
He was the lead in My Spy. It was ok
But dave is also a good actor. Arnold was mainly a big guy.
Who?
Drax in Guardians of the Galaxy, but he was also excellent in Blade Runner 2049 and the two Dune flicks.
Also in glass onion.
His character in Glass Onion is absolutely terrible, I love to hate him in it. He does such a good job with it.
What's it with people adding a "t" to his name all the time?
Damn it, I thought I had it right.
For me, not knowing Austrian pronounciation, and not realizing that the z has a clear t sound in it, so ut felt right when I did it.
Mr. Schwarzenegger, if you are reading this, I am sorry for misspelling your name.
Either The Rock or John Cena
Yeah. I feel like The Rock in terms of overall success, but John Cena more in that Cena's career seems more willing to take the career risks that Schwarzenegger did.
John Cena perhaps. The dude is crazy talented and started off as a wrestler due to his physique.
If I'm understanding your question right, the 2010s were fairly dominated by marvel's movie machine, and RDJ was probably the stand out lead of those films, though Samuel L Jackson is the highest grossingactor of that decade i think. RdJ has now garnered the critical acclaim in the 2020s that was missing, so there's a reasonable chance RDJ could be the man you're looking for. Leo DiCaprio is the most revered critically over the same period I think, of leading men in highly rated films. Though Tom Cruise, for whatever reasons, is really the last of the real Moviestars, but his career spans over the earlier period too of the 00's and even 80s, & 90s.
Lots of media theory was aimed at the depictions of men on screen in the 80s. I’d say a modern equivalent might be (hear me out….) Ryan Gosling. Start with La La Land, where he establishes himself as a guy who can sing and dance, then go through to Barbie. Sure, it’s not the muscle men of the ‘80s, but it’s a new male archetype.
Honestly I didn't even enjoy it much but in a way the only memorable action movie I've seen in the last 2 decades was Drive.
There has been big stuff like Inception but that's more of a mind fuck movie. Everything else is a sequel or a comic book. The only others I can think of was the Accountant and the Kingsman
Where Arnold's action movies seem like an example of the 80's (at least looking back on movies at that time). Drive seems like a fit for the 2010s. Man just struggling to get by, finding it difficult to fit in, doing what he has to do. Lot more gritty and depressing.
I wanted to disagree with you, but checking the data almost all of the best action flicks I could have sworn were fairly recent actually came out in the early-mid noughts. Seems like after The Matrix blew up the genre, nobody ever figured out how to put it back together.
Even if I wanted to quibble and argue for ~~the best~~ my personal favorite action flicks within a precise "2 decade" window... it's a depressingly short list:
-
2004
- Hellboy (technically a comic movie, but I'm keeping it because Doug Jones and Ron Perlman just rocked)
- Kill Bill Vol. 2 (Vol 1 missed the cutoff)
-
2006
- Crank
-
2007
- Hot Fuzz
-
2009
- The Bourne Ultimatum
- District 9
-
2017
- Baby Driver
... Almost every single other action flick I thought of came out between 1998 and 2004. (Also, 2000 was a weirdly good year for action fans in retrospect)
Sigh. I'm gonna go bemoan the world getting lame and shake my cane at the kids out on my lawn.
Edit: JOHN WICK! How TF did I forget those? But yeah, I'm pretty sure that's it now.