this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
181 points (94.6% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3708 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meanwhile, in Florida, the GOP is busy banning water breaks for working people

Please vote in November!

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 214 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Good step, but let's get that down to a 32 hour work week with no reduction in pay.

Most jobs that are OT exempt have been shown to be more productive with a slightly shorter work week.

[–] [email protected] 91 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

totally agree. I remember in the '90s, we were told that because of technology, we would have way more leisure time and everyone wouldn't have to work so hard.

The exact opposite happened as productivity skyrockets and wages stagnate. it's time to fix that with a 34 hour work week!

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They've been saying that since the 1950s. Thankfully our corporate masters figured out how to fill our lives with toil so we don't have to endure the horror of enjoying them.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I used to work in construction. When I saw the first new tool demonstration, I thought, "Cool!" After the 50th, I thought "Great. Another thing to make working easier so we can just work more."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

But on the flip side, new tools are pretty cool.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, new tools are still probably a good thing if it means less damage to one's body over time.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

You know what else reduces bodily damage?

Being home 😆

But in all seriousness you're right, but that lies right at the heart of the "productivity vs pay" debate. We create all sorts of new tools (coughautomationcough) that increase our productivity, but the only people who reap the benefits of that are the capitalists who now have time to play two rounds of golf on Tuesday instead of one.

We create better tools to enable work to be easier. But now we're expected to produce more instead of have a better work-life balance.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago

We're literally never going to have that utopia as long as we maintain this "ownership class."

We "don't deserve" the fruits of the increased productivity because they came with the technology and machines that the ownership class owns.

"They deserve the profit because they paid for the machines."

We will literally never have that utopia because the workers don't own anything.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

It wasn’t just the 90’s. That’s been happening since the Industrial Revolution.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

But that’s socialism /s

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Hell how many stories have there been of people getting fired for automating their job haha.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

But then billionaires wouldn't be so stinking rich if we did.

[–] [email protected] 97 points 4 months ago (3 children)

TL:DR; more people are going to get overtime pay.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago

Thank you! The goddamned lede was buried.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I always thought the idea of being on a salary was disgustingly abusive/exploitative. I can't believe I have coworkers that defend the idea that they work more hours but don't get paid for it.

Like what??

I do fully expect to see a disgusting reduction in pay coming for those salaried people though. The boss never loses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I think it’s one of those things, like non-compete agreements that make sense for a small number of people but somehow was allowed to spread to everyone.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago

Suddenly, a large number of people are now classified as part-time workers scheduled for 39.999 hours a week.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago

Just in time for the supreme court to declare the NLRB unconstitutional

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

From who? Who'd he save it from? Can we get a 32 hour work week? No? Why not?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Read the article, it’s pretty clear who the author targets as the villain here. I haven’t verified the accuracy of it, but taking them at their word: management and the GOP that let requirements of who is guaranteed OT pay dwindle. This restores what Obama did that was then dismantled by right wing judges and Trump.

I think it has the potential of being a stepping stone, in first restoring who gets OT, to later push hours reduction before OT kicks in.