this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
283 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19249 readers
2147 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine has signed a measure to ensure President Joe Biden will appear on the state ballot in November.

DeWine, a Republican, signed the measure — which relaxes a state candidate filing deadline — Sunday along with a related bill that imposes a ban on foreign nationals contributing to state ballot campaigns. Both will take effect Aug. 31.

The Republican-dominated Legislature had approved the two measures last week during a rare special session. The contribution ban had been demanded by the Senate, which approved the measures Friday, a day after the House passed them.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 97 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Mike DeWine, deserving of praise for clearing the lowest bar... but that bar is one that a lot of GOP asshats couldn't clear so.... sort of semi-genuine thanks?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yep. That’s what we get in a post-Trump world. If we were back in the 2010s, any governor helping the sitting POTUS/a major party presumptive nominee fix what amounts to a scheduling issue would be non-news.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don't think a Republican governor helping Obama's reelection campaign in 2012 would have been quietly accepted.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There would have been a vocal minority on the right wing pissing and moaning about it on fox, but I don’t think the expectation would be that this hypothetical governor would deliberately obstruct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I was referring to the hemming and hawing from the sidelines, especially from the birther crowd in Congress and right-wing media.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Easy to ignore if you just don’t consider right wing media to be news 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Quietly? Probably not. (Tan suit and all that.) But those are very different times. Remember when McCain defended Obama in one of his (McCain's) town halls? That's the level of decorum that's been lost.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Right, but the fact that it was noteworthy in the news cycle then that McCain had that level of decorum against his own voting base is what I was speaking to. DeWine came out with tact and decorum to handle this non-issue, too. Voters back then were hanging and burning Obama in effigy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Freaking lunatics.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago

I will acknowledge that in this case the involved Republicans behaved in a way that I don't hate.

Gotta go take a shower now.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Ohioan here.

This came at the consequence of a nebulous “anti foreign funding” bill for ballot issues. Sounds harmless but 1) we already have laws against this and 2) republicans’ story around the abortion amendment that passed last year is that it was funded mostly by out of state entities, so we know that’s a card they want to play with more force.

Mike Dewine is a republican but is truly prolly the most moderate guy I’ve seen on that side of the aisle. He did a really good job of handling covid here, and other than the usual republican stances on weed or abortion, he’s generally likable.

That said, our republican legislature is not likable. They fought tooth and nail to keep from even having to make this decision, and when they finally did, they had to do it on their own terms.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (3 children)

He did a really good job of handling covid here,

He absolutely didn't.

He did at first, but the moment the kickback started from his party and Trump, he folded, like the spineless worm he is.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

^^ Just corroborating this.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Source? He kept up mask mandates, closures, and vaccine recommendations.

I’m no republican but I’m not about to not give credit where it’s due lol. Our red state behaved quite blue during that time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

This is an accurate statement.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

That’s just an example of how far right the republican party has gone. Dewine used to be considered more right than the rest of his party. He had pushed for a heartbeat bill forever and was never considered a moderate. But because of how bat shit insane the Republican party in Ohio has gotten he seems moderate compared to the rest.

In reality though, it’s just that he’s one of the last Adults left in the room. So even small things like this, which have been done for democrats and republicans in past years, makes him seem moderate. trust me though, while he might respect the rule of law and believe in democracy a moderate it doesn’t make him.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Take the high road, we're all supposed to be neighbors first.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That’s…… the opposite of what happened here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Thanks, fixed my comment.