I still think he only picked him because for decades the "JD Power Rankings" were a huge deal.
So trump associates JD Vance with being powerful, even if he couldn't remember why
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
263 points (97.8% liked)
politics
18828 readers
4752 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
"JD Power" is probably what he calls his penis.
His couch, on the other hand, calls him "weird". And rightly so :/
Diabolical thinking.
Holy crap flashback, I had completely forgotten about JD Power rankings.
Man, the amount of heads buried in the sand on this is egregious. He picked him for one reason and one reason only. If he wins Vance will play ball in 28 when they suspend elections. No one in Trump's campaign cares about his weird emails, his couch, or his brown family. He has one job and he is morally flexible enough to break his oath of office to do it.
Yeah, but if Vance costs Trump the election none of that comes into play. Trump needs to get back into the oval office to have the option of destroying democracy once and for all.
They have been planning for that since Jan 7th, 2021. This isn't some fly-by-night if I win thing, this will be a well-planned coup attempt. I hope I am wrong but they are openly insinuating as to what their plans are.
Edit: changes 2020 to 2021 Thank you Samus12345 for pointing out the mistake.
2021, you mean?
Yes, thank you.
I mean he can't abuse presidential immunity if he's not president. Vance can't refuse to transition power to a new administration if he isn't VP. They can try another Jan. 6th but without trump dangling the possibility of pardon's that's less attractive to would be rioters. Some backwoods states can threaten to secede but they'll get shut down in a heartbeat if they actuality try. The gravy seals can threaten a civil war but the idea that they can size power for more than a weekend in some hick town is a pipe dream.
So, let's just keep underestimating the opposition, and let's see where that gets us.
I'm not underestimating them. If Trump wins this year it's all over. Kiss democracy goodbye. If Trump loses they have no other moves. They're done. That's what you suggested in your first post, and then you decided to argue that they will win even if Trump loses which is crazy town talk.
I think you are, and I think the left has made a hobby of underestimating the "Christian" right. I think it is very naive to say the only backing they have is backwoods states and gravy seals. They have had 4 years to plan and organize. They had fake electors, police, and active-duty military; that one alone should scare you, and now 19 governors actively pushing the election fraud lie. They have the courts, and all it would take is some organized violence and solid leadership.
None of what I am typing matters because you will keep your head buried just like everyone else because then you would have to admit this movement is bigger than you have been told or want to believe. That's been the problem since 2016, underestimating the ideology that runs Trump is how we got him.
I hope you are right, but I am still going to be ready for it if or when you are wrong. As the old man said, "We will see."
Peace
I do fear an uprising after Trump loses in November, since he won’t accept his defeat. Still much better than him winning though.
Bring it. Those assholes need to be shown they have no place in a democratic America.
Don't get too complacent. Everybody here thinks JD Vance is a bad choice and will cost Trump his re-election.
Exactly the same way nobody believed Trump would be elected in 2016.
Yah, but Schumer saying all this forces Trump to keep him to keep face. Can't have Chuck be right, doncha know. It's a good play, unusually good for the Democrats.
While all the other politicians are doing their weird sex dungeon stuff in the middle of the night, they're laughing at this dipshit for not knowing how to cover his tracks.
On a related note, what the fuck, Ohio ??!?
As an Ohioan I have been wondering the same thing since he was elected. The bad news was smeared about this douche months before he somehow got elected.
Rolling Stone Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)
Rolling Stone is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.
Bias: Left
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rolling-stone/
Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News:
- https://ground.news/find?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rollingstone.com%2Fpolitics%2Fpolitics-news%2Fschumer-trump-regrets-weird-vance-1235069638%2F
Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.
Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.
Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.
Good Bot
The Rolling Stone magazine has a very storied history that a media bias algorithm will not capture.
LMAO
In a true nod to the great Rolling Stone writer Hunter S Thompson, including the bit about trolling Vance about the fucking couch meme
Even without the couch fuckin', JD is a deeply weird guy. It's hard to say who is more of a creepy weirdo, him or Speaker Johnson. The only way it gets more into the creepy weirdo territory is to find some random RW incel who is terminally online, or someone like Shapiro...
Trump's is pretty far up there as far as creepy weirdos go.
Oh, most definitely. Good point. I guess VD and him make a good pairing. Old creepy weirdo with kinda younger creepy weirdo.
Electric Sharks dodo da do do.....
I know the Biden-Kamala switch just happened, but is there any precedence for a VP candidate getting swapped out after the nomination?
i don't think anything about any of this has precedence...if it did, SCOTUS would have overturned it by now
George McGovern has entered the chat.
George's first Veep was Thomas Eagleton, who was found to have had an extensive psychiatric history after securing the nomination.
It was a giant setback for McGovern.
iirc the second Veep was Shriver, Arnold Schwarzenegger's father in law
When you're sufficiently weirder than Chuck fucking Schumer that nobody notices the hypocrisy of him of all people using that insult, you're fucking WEIRD 😂
I don't find Chuck Schumer weird at all. The Republican party though is weird as fuck, however.
Chuck Schumer, weird?
Yup. Usually more in the "odd and kooky" way of an eccentric grandad rather than the maliciously creepy kind of Republicans, but weird nonetheless lol.