this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
367 points (99.2% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4622 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Vice-president brushes off remarks by Donald Trump in which he said Harris ‘happened to turn Black’ a number of years ago

Kamala Harris has shrugged off Donald Trump’s questioning of her racial identity, saying that it was “the same old show” and that “America deserves better”, at a rally in Texas.

On Wednesday, in an appearance at the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ), Trump antagonised senior Black journalists and questioned Harris’s race, saying, “She was always of Indian heritage, and she was only promoting Indian heritage. I didn’t know she was Black until a number of years ago, when she happened to turn Black.”

His interview, which was meant to last an hour, according to Axios, was cut short after 34 minutes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 month ago (3 children)

“He did crap the bed today. The only question is if he’s going to roll around in it or change the sheets.”

— GOP operative Scott Jennings, on CNN about Donald Trump’s questioning of whether Kamala Harris is Black

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

He’s absolutely rolling around in the shit, and his campaign’s yes men and his cultish supporters will tell him he smells like roses

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He NEVER changes the sheets, just declares that they're the greatest sheets ever, everyone is saying it, and continues to be cheered by his cult as he keeps shitting and rolling around in it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

GOP operative Scott Jennings has apparently never heard of Donald Trump.

[–] solsangraal 46 points 1 month ago (8 children)

i don't understand. what does he think he gains if he were to actually convince people that she's only "pretending to be black"? it sounds like the only reason he even went to that event was to get more votes from racists who were already going to vote for him..whatever. fucking moron

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

... what does he think...

That's the secret: he doesn't.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

He doesn't have that thing in his head we all have to tell him what he is about to say is fucking stupid. It's a direct path from brain to mouth.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Ironically, that is also the secret to his success because his moronic cultists perceive it as "authentic".

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

His people arranged it and told him to go, otherwise he would have never been there. Someone in his camp decided it was a good idea.

[–] solsangraal 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"mr dear leader majesty sir, we really need to bring up the black vote numbers"

"easy, i'll just tell them harris won't do anything for them because she's not actually black!"

"um..there are multiple problems with that argument sir..."

"shut up and get me a happy meal"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

"shut up and get me a happy meal"

This is just unrealistic, Big Macs don't come as a happy meal lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Close, but he doesn't need them to vote for him. He just needs them NOT to vote for Harris.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

The best people, to be sure

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

I think this is just his narcissism, racism, and sexism all fighting it out for top billing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

what does he think he gains if he were to actually convince people that she's only "pretending to be black"?

It means horrible attacks against her aren’t racism. It’s a permission slip to his followers to be racist to her.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He’s not going to win on ideas, policy or record against her but if the narrative becomes “she lied about her race” those issues aren’t in the narrative.

He’s an awful human being but he’s media savvy.

[–] solsangraal 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if the narrative becomes “she lied about her race”

true. keep everyone on the defensive and make them waste time debunking bullshit

but he’s media savvy.

gotta disagree. he's an awful human being and his cult followers are just dumb enough to lap up all his bullshit like hogs at the trough

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Thats the thing - he knows how to shovel the BS.

He has the rubes thinking that a guy who literally shits on a gold toilet understands and gives a shit about them. They think he's tough when he's an epic whiner…he knows how to con people and the media just parrots his shit because ratings matter more than truth and he knows it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think it might matter to black voters? I'm only trying to seriously answer your question.

[–] solsangraal 8 points 1 month ago

i'm sure. but here's an old white racist with a large black audience (many of whom, i'm sure, are probably also biracial) making the implication that they need him to tell them who's black and who isn't.

it's pants-on-head stupid, no matter how they try to spin it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Bingo, he's trying to discourage them from voting. He's using one of his common strategies of looking for a reason an opponent is popular and saying whatever that reason is is untrue. Apparently it being something immutable like ethnicity is no object to a dumbass like him.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Because large swaths of his voter base (and party in general) are inherently racist so attacking from this angle resonates best with them.

Also, when this is his biggest vector of attack against someone that should let you know exactly how much they have on the table

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I think he just wants to talk about her race, and this way of talking about it (in his little worm filled brain) makes black people not like her.

He's so racist he doesn't realize most other people aren't

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Trump said of Harris, “Don’t forget. Four weeks ago she was considered, like, the worst,” and that she had had a “personality makeover … All of a sudden she’s considered the new Margaret Thatcher”.

Literally no one is comparing Kamala Harris to Margaret Thatcher... except Trump I guess. 🤣 I bet there are a significant number of voting Millenials who don't even know who Margaret Thatcher is. The ol' weirdo's references are weak and long past their best-before date, just like him.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

All Millennials need to know is that Margaret Thatcher is the Reagan of the UK to know what they think of her.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or that Ding Dong the Witch is Dead reached Number 2 in the charts just after she died.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Didn't know that, nice!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't millennials know that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ask the person I responded to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Ah meant to, my bad, misclick

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Comparing Thatcher to a woman of color lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Anyway, they should know who she was, and how much damage her fucked up economics did.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Fuck old Maggie. Veep Harris is far better than that conservative nitwit. See we want Harris to nationalize more not privatize the air we breathe and the sense of community we feel

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

His interview, which was meant to last an hour, according to Axios, was cut short after 34 minutes.

"So, Project 2025..."

"This interview is over!"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Kamala is right. It is.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Do you remember when Biden received a lot of flack for saying "you ain't black" if you vote for Trump. It was just another symptom of the problem of having leaders so ancient that they often come off as tone deaf.

In Biden's defense, though, he seemed to recognize he misstepped and proceeded with more sensitivity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He didn't just seem to recognize it, he said so explicitly.

Definitely won't see that from Trump.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Good point. At the time, I didn't give him the benefit of the doubt and kinda forgot over time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

“The same old show” - if that’s deliberate, and not just a convenient idiom, I’m impressed.

Either way her messaging thus far has been at least a breath of fresh air, at most it’s kicking trump’s old weird ass all over the map.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

trump is a weird, old convicted felon. And his followers are weird.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

As I understand it, it was Trump's own goons that insisted the interview end early. They were trying to save him from his continuous faceplanting. Well facehopping by the end.

load more comments
view more: next ›