this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
246 points (94.9% liked)

politics

18828 readers
4684 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Scaramucci also tweeted, "When polls drop (and they will), Trump is going to go full on racist."

Trump has always been a racist. We've always known it. I guess he can always escalate, but don't pretend this is a new thing. Racism is at the core of his identity.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Did the Central Park Five case give it away?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

He still insists that they had criminal records when they did not and he knows that because at President he could background check anyone he feels like at a level no one else in this country could.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

They're not calling it a new thing. They're saying he's going to be more overt about it.

Keep in mind, there's still a non-zero chance the guy just straight up says the N word in public before this whole thing is through. As blindingly obvious as Trump's racism is, it can still get even more obvious.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago (4 children)

How bout we just go vote him out. That's the important part right now. We don't need hyperbole, we just go vote in November

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Might not be enough. Apparently they have better plans in place to manipulate the voting proces into (incorrectly) declaring Trump and others the winner, even if the votes say something else.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

That's not going to work. This isn't Venezuela. If official results differ from exit polls, Democrats would not accept it.

Trump fans are just loud. They're not going to do anything.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is naive thinking. They tried to overturn the result in 2020 and they've had four years to hone their strategy. Moderates who defended the election process last round have been pushed out of office. States with GOP legislatures in particular could refuse to certify totals and instead send electors of their own choosing.

It's not as simple as who gets more votes. The process requires that officials at multiple levels of government work in good faith, and there are a lot of bad faith actors taking office. Look at who won the Maricopa County primaries yesterday. That's the modern GOP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Isn't that what happened with gore vs bush?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That was decided by SCOTUS

...We're fucked

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

And 2 scotus appointees by the orange turd...were involved with the Gore v Bush election bs

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Although the vice president trails Trump by 5 percent in a national Rasmussen poll,

Oh wow, then Harris must be at least 10% ahead! That's actually stellar news. 😀

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah Rasmussen is shit, but unfortunately every poll always seems to be D is up 5 points! Reality: D was down 15. :(

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Barret and the gang are getting serious apparently

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

They always were. They were too extreme for the main Avalanche faction too.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Rasmussen poll

LOL why even give that shit space in your article? Like its one of the worst! Even 538 gives it a poor grade (doesn't even make it to the top 275)

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Because rawstory - like all ad-supported media - wants money. It’s a horse race bonanza.

Polls released in late July or early August have offered some . . .

It was published August 1. What “early August” poll are they referencing? Apparently one that happened within 12 hours of the story?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I love the "or" part. You're the goddamn "journalist" find out what the date was lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Yeah. The literal second a poll is released it's getting analyzed. Then it's weird to read about later the same day because the stories have to be written to make sense a year from now.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

LoL i didn't catch that part, good call

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We just need Trump to hold on a little longer. Just until the ballots are printed.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He can only drop it to JD Vance now, who would be a surefire loser.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unless he replaces Vance and then drops

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I believe he can't replace Vance at this point. Vance could himself drop I think? There's lots of FEC questions on that one.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Only thing Shady Vance will be dropping is his pants at the Raymour & Flanagan Labor Day sale.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

That joke is sofa king stupid

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

💥💥💥💥

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Like the ff7 terrorist group? Or the video game studio? Which avalanche we talking about? (Too many summer steam games played recently)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Both seem keen on fighting corrupt politicians, be it in Medici or Midgar. Hard to tell.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Always saw President Shinra as a competent Trump, and Rufus as "Hi, I'm Eric!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Rufus was infinitely smarter tha an Eric could even conceive of

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Ugh. Sweaty rapist face. Can we not, photo editors?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Let your freak flag fly, Big T. We love seeing you flail and get weirder and meltdown. The more that everyone sees your unhinged bullshit, the worse it looks for ya in November.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump is attempting to ski now?!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh man, I wish he would. That would be hilarious to see. And dangerous for such an out of shape old man.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

It's August. There is no snow.

I reeeeaaaaaaly want to see him try to ski now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Scaramucci also tweeted, "When polls drop (and they will), Trump is going to go full on racist."

Why does the media keep pretending that Anthony Scaramucci is a serious person? He’s as much of a whore for attention as Trump.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I used to think so too, but I watch him on the Rest is Politics US podcast he comes across as very thoughtful with great insights.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

He's an asshole but not an idiot, and he's not pretending to be anything he's not

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

These headlines are so over the top.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

We can only hope

load more comments
view more: next ›