Gosh, I wonder which party he's affiliated with?
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Did you find out yet? Were your assumptions right?
Yes, and yes.
I'm honestly surprised it's just campaign finance and not another kid diddler or a scandal about what (weird, but) consenting adults did in an airport bathroom.
This is just what he was caught doing. Doesn't mean that other stuff isn't happening.
Another weird bastard committing a crime.
He's just auditioning for a SCOTUS nomination.
#weirdos
It's amazing how both parties are exactly the same and do this stuff, amiright?
/s
That's because the deep state commie librul law enforcement won't attack Democrats, duh! Because as we all know, LEOs are universally not conservatives, right?
Let's don't get too haughty too hasty.
Senator Menendez finally resigned like last week.
Also, Chicago. Just, Chicago. And I say that as a resident and major booster of this wonderful city. But the corruption is real.
There's a difference, though. When the Democrats get a Menendez - or a Blagojevich, or a Weiner - they don't go to the ends of the Earth to insulate them from the consequences of their actions. Menendez was already persona non grata by the time he finally resigned, and no one would come to his defense.
I don't disagree with you. When they get caught, they are more likely to face consequences. I'm not saying there aren't major differences, just that those differences are a bit less stark when it comes to finances.
I'm not saying there aren't major differences, just that those differences are a bit less stark when it comes to finances.
Only if you ignore everything other than the base crime itself.
They may both commit the same crime, but the cover up is always worse than the crime, and we've got a cover up party that could easily rival the cosmetics industry.
except we've stopped seeing republicans even resign for things. The news broke that trump may be guilty of a nearly identical crime and its unlikely he'll resign in disgrace.
Santos is now facing a criminal indictment that accuses him of reporting non-existent personal loans to his campaign in order to be eligible for other campaign contributions.
For anyone who didn’t want to read the article
Edit: quoted the wrong part, lol. Read below for the better quote
thats where they mention santos, but for the meat of ogles controversy:
Despite having reported making the $320,000 personal loan, Ogles' personal financial disclosures did not show any substantial investments — not even a savings account.
Lmao fucking amateur
No not even amateur, an amateur would at least have his wife buy a car wash or some bullshit