this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
1055 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59753 readers
2837 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 309 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Now they can replace them without paying unemployment and pay the new workers a lower wage. This is what they wanted to happen. Mega corporations are a problem we need to solve as a society.

[–] [email protected] 128 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Quality programmers are a finite resource. Amazon chewed through the entire unskilled labor market with their warehouses and then struggled to find employees to meet their labor needs. If they try the same stunt with skilled labor they're in for a very rude awakening. They'll be able to find people, but only for well above market rates. They're highly likely to find in the long run it would have been much cheaper to hang onto the people they already had.

[–] [email protected] 99 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The whole problem with companies like Amazon is that hardly anyone in charge of them seems to care about long term sustainability. They all just invest enough effort to squeeze out some short term profits, earn their bonuses and then leave for another company to do it all again. Nobody is interested in sustainability because there is no incentive to. They're playing hot potato with the collapse of the company.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Now expand that to the entire planetary economy. Unsustainable short term gains is the entire industrial revolution.

We're only 300 years in and most life and ecosystems on Earth have been destroyed and homogenized to service humanity. We're essentially a parasite. It's not surprising that the most successful corporations are the most successful parasites. It's just parasites, doing parasitic things, because they're parasites... from the top down.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's the next executive's problem. These executives will jump ship with their golden parachutes before any of that affects them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)

yeah, the only problem is that this results in the best talent leaving, you're stuck with people who have nowhere else to go. it's one of those short-term profits kinda things, which is why Wall St loves it so much.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I thought the same. Interesting strategy cutting the people who are good enough to get another job.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (4 children)

And they want people off the vesting ramp as early as possible.

Amazon does 5-15-40-40

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 254 points 2 months ago (18 children)

5 day RTO is a stealth layoff. This is a feature, not a bug.

[–] [email protected] 101 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's like reverse stack ranking. They'll be left with the people that couldn't find another job.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 months ago (1 children)

and the people who know exactly how to waste time in an office.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That's literally what we all do in office. Just sit ans chat. It's country club. Productivity went up during covid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

A.k.a. Twitter and the elon filtering moment

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago

Yep this has been the modus operandi for businesses who want to reduce workforce without having to pay for layoffs.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Like many companies, they overhired in the last 4 years. Some of these people are due years of severance (my offer listed 2months for every year after 1 year), not to mention the vested stocks and other bonuses granted during this insane hot hire period.

So how do you remove people not loyal to the company? The most hated mandate ever. Amazon is a company that doesn’t need people in the office. This is nothing more than screwing people over.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 116 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Amazing.

They order people to work in different offices than before, far away from before, or in offices that did not even exist before. They order people to work in offices who have only worked at home before.

And they call it "return", and everybody seems to accept the audacity.

Nobody laughs out loud into their faces and calls them the dirty liars that they are.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

Because people who suck their tits need their milk.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 103 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just as planned - Amazon Execs who aren't planning to rehire them anyway.

They do this shit to cull you.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 2 months ago (6 children)

It's sort of a strange approach, because this will leave you with the workers who can't find employment elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

Exactly...they won't be picky about raises or working conditions.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago

By the time that negative effect kicks in, the execs already cashed in their bonuses and are on their way out of the sinking ship

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 102 points 2 months ago (4 children)

That was probably the intent. It works as a soft layoff. Do something wildly unpopular, knowing that a bunch of employees will quit. The ones left will pick up the slack, because obviously if they had anywhere else to go they would’ve left with the first group.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Seems like a great way to lose all your talented employees

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunately a dollar in cut costs is more valuable than employee talent these days.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 2 months ago (12 children)

I really do wonder if Amazon will run out of people willing to work for them someday. Their approach assumes there is an infinite supply of workers to burn through. Given everything I’ve witnessed from the company, I’d never work there. Do they at some point poison the labor pool against them?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We're constantly producing new people that don't know any better

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (9 children)

When I joined Amazon, I was told that for some roles in the US Amazon received more applications than corporate employees worldwide - so I assume 1M+.

That number has probably reduced significantly, given we've now had two rounds of RTO. I know some recruiters are really struggling to find external candidates to join, and rightly so, but I don't doubt that Amazon can find someone to fill these roles, or can find someone outside of North America or Europe to take that role.

The FAANG acronym was the worst thing to happen to tech, because people will flock to Amazon to say "I worked for FAANG". Prestige is a powerful thing to some, and they'll deal with some insane shit for the clout that comes from being here.

(FWIW, I've been at Amazon as a software engineer for close to four years now, and I've noticed zero improvement in opportunities afforded to me)

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (4 children)

You could also think this applies to all corporations in some degree. But no, there's a fresh batch of bright eyed optimistic people out of school every year.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago

You could also think this applies to all corporations in some degree. But no, there's a fresh batch of ~~bright eyed optimistic people out of school~~ people desperate to not be homeless or starve every year.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 84 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If it's anything like my work and their RTO a few things.

  1. hR is well aware of attrition rates and I bet they're through the roof
  2. Any new hires are probably not the best or brightest they could expect to hire

So expect quality at Amazon to decline. It may not be outwardly visible but mark my words for those that are still there it will devolve into a chaotic shit show of overworked employees that are left backfilling work for those who left and the incompetence that came in.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago

expect quality at Amazon to decline.

They'll have to dig a new basement for it to get any lower.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I canceled my Prime membership earlier this year because of that decline in quality. I wish everyone could, but thanks to the loss of retail throughout the country many can't afford not to have it.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Prime is not a money saver. It's a money waster that tricks you into buying more stuff just because "the shipping is free" but you can often get free shipping without Prime or Amazon. Just wait until you need enough stuff to meet the store's free shipping threshold to make an order.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (8 children)

I have a feeling the big impact is going to be in other services, namely AWS. Makes me wonder if some new global outages are coming, which are always fun to deal with.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 months ago (12 children)

I know some tech workers who really want to return to office full time along with everyone else. They miss the old way. It’s not everyone, and it’s definitely not me, but it’s a legitimate position. I guess now they know where they can go.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I honestly don't see an issue with the people going back to the office because they want to work from there. I just want others to stop trying to force me to do the same.

This sort of thing seems to have always been a plague with a set of the extroverted sort. They seem to feel the whole world should for whatever reason cater to what makes them happy and us introverted types that do not like the social activities that they do should be made to partake anyway. For our own good. Yet the world is ending when those same extroverted people have to spend a large chunk of time alone or simply being quiet.

The older I get the less patience I have for those sorts of games. Which could become an issue for me professionally I suppose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (11 children)

I know some people like this too.

To be fair, a nontrivial number of them are middle/upper management, but it's not the entirety of the people I know who want this.

The answer isn't work-from-home, nor is it return-to-office. The answer is: give people a choice.

If you want to work from home, cool, we don't need to maintain your cubicle, and/or, we can hire more people without needing more office space. If you want to return to office, cool, your space is waiting for you.

A few will retain the ability to switch back and forth, but the majority of people I've talked to about it, either want office or home exclusively. Very few want hybrid.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (7 children)

That and executive ass covering, a way to avoid admitting to shareholders that they wasted their money on useless commercial real estate.

It's also shooting themselves in the foot. The first people to leave aren't going to be the clock punchers, it will be the best and brightest who can easily find other jobs.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago

That might've been the plan all along.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Wow, it seems like the return-to-office mandate is causing quite the shake-up! Totally get why folks are jumping ship - flexibility has become such a big deal, especially after getting used to working from home. I read that 65% of workers now say they'd consider quitting if they couldn't work remotely! It's all about finding that work-life balance in a job that respects our needs. Hang in there, tech friends—plenty of companies out there understand the power of flexibility and trust!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

pop culture stock picker Jim Cramer points while looking cranky

That's a sell cue, for any shareholders reading along.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago

Nah, the shareholders love this shit.

I mean, most of them. Please ignore my piles of AMZN.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

To literally no one’s surprise, least of all the leadership at Amazon. No unemployment when you quit.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (8 children)

The problem being that the ones moving on to other jobs are the actual talent. Unlike a targeted layoff, this leaves Amazon with the employees no one else wanted.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›