this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
106 points (92.7% liked)

chat

8159 readers
444 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's a situation that I have been expecting for a while, but I wasn't fully ready to accept it. Specifically it's one of my LGBTQ friends who honestly believes in the democrats will protect them and their partner. I have tried to make the point that both parties are eroding any sort of civility towards all marginalized groups, but fear seems to drive them more than logical observations. They make the excuse that change doesn't happen over night and that the left continues to grow and will have meaningful affects down the road. I fundamentally just don't agree with that idea and vocalize it regularly. More and more it is ending up in a circular argument where I am painted as unrealistic and my rhetoric (leftist rhetoric) is doing more harm than good because it promotes distrust in the only system we have to work with. I try to tell them it's kind of the whole point. We gotta start somewhere if we want to see a better, more representative system, but they are so hung up on the immediate future while simultaneously saying that my idealistic feelings are shortsighted and I cant expect change in the immediate future... The double-talk is wild, I know.

I am trying my hardest to stop from engaging at this point because on the most basic level we agree on a lot of stuff, but they are just way to wrapped up in the fear mongering of the democratic party. They know that the two party system is broken, they know that something drastic needs to change, but they also think that they are powerless to do anything except choose the lesser evil. It pains me because I am watching them do the same shit past generations have done, where they give up on their ideals for the sake of preserving the current status quo that they benefit from. I am legitimately watching them imply "fuck you, got mine" under the guise of civic duty and I hate it. I want nothing more than to be able to finally say "I told you so" without being a smug asshole about it and ruining our friendship.

Thanks for reading my rant. It's probably a bit disjointed, but the frustration is boiling over and I needed to vent to the only group of people that seems to understand the hopelessness of being a disenfranchised leftist.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

More and more it is ending up in a circular argument where I am painted as unrealistic and my rhetoric (leftist rhetoric) is doing more harm than good because it promotes distrust in the only system we have to work with.

Noticing genocide is more socially unacceptable than committing it. Also, even recognizing a system is dehumanizing, don'tchaknow.

Thanks for reading my rant. It's probably a bit disjointed, but the frustration is boiling over and I needed to vent to the only group of people that seems to understand the hopelessness of being a disenfranchised leftist.

Right there with you. It's lonely enough already without having to worry about losing friends, and it hardly feels like I'm doing everything I can to fight back against the genociders when I can't even talk about it with my loved ones or get them on the right side.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

For me it's the whole "the left is continuing to grow"

Liberals have been shifting to the right for years. The democratic president is endorsed by dick fucking cheyney, is running on more cruelty on the border, and has completely given up even discussing universal Healthcare, and has completely dropped the ball on abortion.

The liberals are objectively getting worse which is to be expected when their main strategy is justnconceding to republicans on everything.

And it doesn't even bother liberals, they'll tell you with a straight face that bidens the most pro environemnt pro union president in history you can tell them "were drilling more oil than anyone ever anywhere and every time there's a strike you liberals keep saying it's a Russian hoax to hurt democrats"

And they just roll their eyes and fucking act like they're so morally superior your real world examples don't count.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

And they just roll their eyes and fucking act like they're so morally superior your real world examples don't count.

UUUUUUUGH!

Yeah its the smugness that gets me the most. Especially my debate lord friends where I almost hear the deep inhale they take before spouting off about the systemic limits.... Of systems they refuse to uproot out of fear of losing access to amazon prime.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Yea the root of the cause is liberals (seemingly intentionally) not actually understanding nefotiation despite the fact they regularly say compromise is their top priority.

You see it in the last strike where theybwere all saying the opening demands were completely unrealistic and then 48 hours later the union had reached a really beneficial deal.

Liberals think if you actually want to get $100 for something an opening bid of $200 is a moral failing.

Liberals negotiate themselves into a corner before their opponents even make an opening offer.

To continue the over simplified example of wanting $100 for something, a liberal woukd say "ideally I want $100 for this but I'm willing to go as low as $60"

Then republicans say "fuck you ill give you $10" and Liberals settle on $5 for the sake of compromise.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Liberals think if you actually want to get $100 for something an opening bid of $200 is a moral failing.

Exactly this.

We must demand true socialism from liberal politicians, so the compromise at least is somewhat acceptable on the short term. (Not that we can vote out capitalism...)

The minimum program is non-neoliberal economics and anti-imperialism. That's the absolute minimum. IF they are not willing to make a compromise with the left why would I vote for them? Because the other guy is a right-winger? Therefore I should vote for a different right winger with different rhetoric, because allegedly they are less corrupt?

Same shit is happening in Europe with different team colors.

A liberal gay friend of ours literally said to us that he'd vote for [anti-gay far right party] if they had a chance to win against [corrupt anti gay right wing party who had been in power for a a while now], but now he thinks he will vote for [centre right party with dubious credentials], only to stop the BIG BAD WOLF, even though he's a "leftist". It makes no sense.

Social democracy, real social democracy is the compromise, and even that's nowhere near enough in the age of climate cataclysm....

Liberals say I'm not pragmatic... but hey let's say I have 4 core political principles: who's the politician who shares at least 2 with me? Who? Why would I vote for 0 matches? Is this the glorious democracy you speak of? For fucks sake, liberals are exhausting... in many ways more exhausting than right wingers.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

It is exhausting. Especially like you say compared to right wingers.

Chuds are aware of the fact and will admit that a lot of their beliefs are just the opposite of whatever you think and they have those beliefs to piss you off.

Liberals have the exact same belief but also claim theirs is the rational and moral belief and actually you're the one being divisive because you don't agree with them the most progressive policy is to shoot all immigrants (and a few of these annoying lefties) into the ocean out of a cannon. Because they're pragmatic and compassionate intellectuals.

Like my knee jerk reaction is to sit that person down and explain to them they aren't a leftist they just want to absolve themselves morally. They are voting for right wing parties, that is mutually exclusive to being a leftist. They aren't progressive they're slightly right of center, just like most people, but they recognize that's a moral failing so they lie to themselves and say they're a leftist even though they're thinking acting and voting light a lib.

It's like all the American libs arguing the democrats are better than republicans on isreal. It doesn't matter how they word it "the party currently doing a genocide is less likely to do a genocide than the party not currently doing a genocide" is never gonna convince anybody who's actually operating in reality. But they can't say "we've decided continuing to do a genocide is more important than getting your vote but also if you don't vote for us we'll consider that a moral failing on your part which makes us superior."

But of course then your being divisive and doing purity tests so the only rational response from your friend is to go full blown right wing because you were mean to them, even thoughthat change wouldn't involve thinking acting or voting any differently.

Truly, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Liberals have the exact same belief but also claim theirs is the rational and moral belief

Chuds do this too tbh, even more so because they're claiming they're fighting "evil"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

For me it's the whole "the left is continuing to grow"

I think they mean PSL and DSA and such, these people are (usually...) at least not delusional to think the Democrats can be "pushed left" anymore

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

That's absolutely the line constantly trrotted out by liberals and op said that was their friends justification for voting for kamala.

Blue Maga is very real, millions of people not only think the dems can be pushed left, millions more believe they already are left.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Just point out the last time any progressive legislation was ever written at the federal level was gay marriage and bring them crashing down to earth. The party has zero interest in actually using the power it has to do good for everyone, they are content to fuck over everyone that isn't in a blue state, and everyone in blue states will be fucked over eventually. This isn't a case of IF, it's a case of WHEN, and that only by reckoning with this reality and committing to working for the change that is sorely needed can marginalised peoples truly get on the correct strategic path. The current strategic path being pushed is a dead end and the liberals are content to continue mis-selling it to you because you choose to be naive as a result of the very understandable fear that reckoning with this instills.

Their claims that we are shortsighted and idealist are projections of the naivity they know they are choosing because it's the only hope they have.

This is also a failure of the left though btw. The left is not offering hope, and until the left finds a way to offer hope people will continue to choose naivity if it feels like a possible hope to them.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

a lot of people want to believe someone is coming to save them.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 13 hours ago

100%

It takes a special kind of cynicism (which i have attained) to understand that most people gives a shit about each other, especially the people with any sort of power.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Talking to some friends last night and people were like "it has no right to be this close!" With like a tinge of fear. Just want to yell whose fault is that? Why doesn't Harris do ANYTHING to address the mountains of concerns people have... No it's allllllll stupid magas.

Another literally made the but she'll do less genocide argument

[–] [email protected] 27 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

fuckin a... I have very similar conversations over here too. Victim blaming the disenfranchised and touting an aura of superiority over the "dumb magas"

i die a little inside when people try to absolve Kamala of the crimes of Joe... I tried to make the point that her being a part of the administration means she supports it, there is no nuance imo.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Like you could make some sort of argument that she could be partially absolved... If she did ANYTHING to indicate her resistance. She could trash bidens policies publicly. She could speak via the media directly to Bibi and say that once she's elected she'll immediate stop all shipments. She could illegal-to-say the entire white House.

She doesn't so she's chill with it and gets no absolution.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I only have a few friends who aren't lib brain poisoned. they have been hard to find, as some of the "leftists" are just about aesthetics and don't engage with any theory, so the glom onto whatever lib talking point reaches them on a visceral level and then regurgitate it whenever the topic is broached. i.e. "the country has right to defend itself"

the genocide in the Middle East has been more galvanizing than most and I really can't engage honestly with those who downplay it to save their own asses from an imagined genocide of their comfortable, financially secure, upper income asses within the highly developed core. like, sorry reality can't compete with the untethered nightmares of libs.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

he genocide in the Middle East has been more galvanizing than most and I really can't engage honestly with those who downplay it to save their own asses from an imagined genocide of their comfortable, financially secure, upper income asses within the highly developed core. like, sorry reality can't compete with the untethered nightmares of libs.

Exactly this, I am very hung up, and rightfully so, on the fact that America is aiding and abetting atrocities right now, live on TV. That doesn't mean I think the threat on other marginalized groups is less important. Yes, I think that right wing american politicians are edging at the idea of waging war against LGBTQ people, and thats why I am critical of both mainstream parties. However, the libs think that being critical of democrats will further erode the faith people have in them and drive them towards the republicans.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

one of the principles I hold to with left/liberatory politics is "an attack on one is an attack on all" which is why I just can't accept some people saying "no, that actual attack on those other people isn't as big of a deal as the attack I imagine is coming for me."

it's a toxic, wrecker-brained bullshit, ahistorical, and anti-solidarity. they are choosing to sell some humans down the river to theoretically protect themselves in the immediate near future, as though that has ever worked out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

More and more it is ending up in a circular argument where I am painted as unrealistic and my rhetoric (leftist rhetoric) is doing more harm than good because it promotes distrust in the only system we have to work with.

As much as I hate conservatives, you can at least level with them on the front of not trusting their government. They end up as hypocrites and fall in line with any real challenge to American hegemony, however, you can at least get them to admit the system doesn't function well for everyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago

watching them imply "fuck you, got mine" under the guise of civic duty

"The poors are poor because they have a poor mindset. Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos get up every morning and have a prosperity routine. But the poor choose to do otherwise. Siiiigh. Oh well. To each their own." smuglord

[–] [email protected] 32 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Dunno what level of comfort your friend is at, but it really does affect how they react. It's really hard to find real connection for those of us living in Anglo countries.

I feel you. My convos with libs seem like I'm talking to a computer chat bot, the empathy and concern that I'd expect from a real person isn't there. Honestly I usually just limit my lib convos to something simple. For real connections, I find that people become better the further you go from the group in power. So look at middle class cishet white men, and go 180 from there. It's pretty hard to find a genuine person with 3 or more of the above characteristics, although I'm sure that exceptions exist.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

My convos with libs seem like I'm talking to a computer chat bot, the empathy and concern that I'd expect from a real person isn't there.

I feel exactly the same way. It's called the empathy gap and it's a symptom of racism. This is how they can manage the mental gymnastics of supporting genocide and thinking of themselves as good people. Brown people just matter less to them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

Food for thought. Thanks for the links.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

Yeah, I have had zero luck so far finding anyone in my life that feels the way I do. I am accepting the fact that I will need to hold my tongue unless I want all the smoke that comes with upsetting lib sensibilities. I have cut plenty of chuds out of my life already, but I know my lib friends are leaps and bounds better and don't deserve the axe yet. However, they are still not at the level they need to be in order to understand or accept my positions on things.

The thing that kills me the most is when I am told that my positions are detrimental to the greater good. Which in their misguided minds is merely keeping the status quo intact.

It's especially miserable because like I said, they are a gay couple who fears the GOP's outward anti-lgbtq rhetoric more than the DNC's covert anti-lgbtq rhetoric. The specific trigger this time around was the Texas governor that blew a dog whistle about gender in sports. My friend brushed it off as "one democrat doesn't represent all of them", which sounded way to much like thin blue line apologia at this point.

At the end of the day, I am realizing that more people than i thought are actually just run of the mill libs. There is nothing I can do really besides wait for conditions to slide further right and hope they realize it too.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 hours ago

who fears the GOP's outward anti-lgbtq rhetoric more than the DNC's covert anti-lgbtq rhetoric.

malcolm x's foxes and wolves

king's negative vs positive peace

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)

There is daylight between the parties on LGBT issues, IMO. Republicans have placed it as a central pillar, with promises to persecute, and we all know the dems won't go to the mat over this. All it will take is a poison pill slipped into a committee and the dems will say they had no choice.

Dems aren't generally looking to actively persecute queer people, they'll cede ground, but the party as a whole isn't building around it. This IS a distinction. There are donors and notable people that the dems may not want to give up readily (Queer orgs donate and volunteer in numbers, and Hollywood actors are mixed in with enough queer people that it's personal for some of them).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah I've been hard in on the protest voting / voting for PSL course of action. But the anti-trans ads are giving me serious pause. I know for a fact the Dems don't care about queer people, but they also aren't campaigning on killing them, so there's a genuine distinction there.

I know people don't want to endorse genocide, I wouldn't expect anyone to cast a vote in support of Kopmala due to some moral obligation, quite the opposite. But I think calling the people who are voting for K*pmala genocide apologists or endorsers of genocide is completely wrong. Voting is absolutely an endorsement, don't get me wrong, but these people aren't voting to throw Palestinians under the bus in exchange for not being killed themselves, they genuinely believe that there is no choice in a electoral context to vote against genocide, so they're just choosing the genocide option that doesn't involve them. Many (relatively) of these people would likely risk themselves to stop sending money to Isn'treal if they felt they had the option. But they're convinced they don't.

But, how are we supposed to build socialism if we keep voting for the lesser evil? If we don't even attempt to get actual leftists into positions of power? How are we meant to show people that electoralism is a waste of energy unless we actually push the people and organizations we care about?

It's like a big blackmail scam, and the whole point is to convince people there's no other options but genocide. And the most horrific part of it is that it's true that there's no other options, but only because everyone collectively believes it.

So if I have a friend who actively despises Kopmala but votes for her, I'm still going to talk to them. I don't really approve of it but they're not an inhuman monster. They're just... housebroken.

These people are genuinely pissing themselves levels of scared. They know they have a gun to their head and they've been convinced through a lifetime that trying to take the gun will always end in them dying. And they think that no matter what they do the person holding the gun to their head will kill a bunch of other people regardless.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

if they are quiet about it and vote on election day, I honestly don't care all that much.
I just can't stand the people who just immediately accept months out from November that "these are the candidates and these are their policies and you can do nothing about it so I am going to vocally support Kopmala and browbeat anyone who says they won't or is critical of her"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ya you don't need to cut ties with libs, maybe do hobbies and other stuff together. But hold your tongue similar to how you would at work. In the end of the day, they're not your comrades. Maybe drop a word here and there to try to radicalise them, but don't hold any hope up.

I'd suggest to join an org, and try to have more poor friends if that's possible. I know it ain't easy though.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I have no intention of cutting ties with them, but have realized that holding my tongue will do wonders for my own mental health as well as the relationships that are based on more than just politics. Like I have said, I dont keep many people around me that dont believe in the same core values, it's just that i put more weight on them in my day to day life. I love treats as much as the next lib, but I don't willfully ignore the damage done in the process of getting the treats. I act in a way to limit that damage even if it means less treats.

Joining an org is an option, would need to be more digital tho, I dont like the public lol.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Can I ask why you don't want to do public? IRL friends are the best.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago

FWIW I'd say your lib friends deserve the axe they're voting for (not that you need to axe them off socially yourself). I get the fears, not AmeriKKKan but from another Anglo country, and as an ethnic Chinese (no PRC citizenship/ties or I'd be packing and planning to leave already lol), queer and trans, coming from an immigrant family and being a naturalized citizen (as a kid) myself, and of course being a commie... well shit's bad. But those who want to toss others under the bus to literal industrial genocide deserve whatever they get if you ask me- and today it's the Palestinians and now the Lebanese, eventually down the line if they don't come under the empire's crosshairs first, it'll be (already is in some considerable level) you and other leftist dissent, or the various other demographics (of fellow citizens) already being stomped down/colonized within the empire...

Hopefully they can learn and become better people. I get how it is, about not wanting to cut them off fully (though also not wanting to talk, that shit is nauseating).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I just tell libs that if they really want Kamala to win, GOTV is historically much more effective than arguing about it. It's my thought-terminating cliché that masks my apathy for their cause with the vaguest sentiment of goodwill.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Cut ties with everyone who watches corporate media (i.e. regularly ingests Western propaganda) during campaign seasons. Don't waste your sanity on people participating in synthetic social hysteria.

You can probably talk to them again a month after the election - especially if their preferred capitalist oligarch "wins".

[–] [email protected] 26 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, I'm taking a less extreme option of avoiding certain topics that I know will scratch them. I am not excusing their bad opinions, I'm just not interested in the circular conversations and eventual belittling of my "unrealistic" or "Idealist" expectations anymore.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I’m sorry, that’s really hard.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 13 hours ago

It's frustrating and disheartening. We used to see eye to eye on most things, but the tinge of fear has reacted differently in us. I became way more radicalized about the declining state of affairs since the beginning of COVID, most of the people around me found easy scapegoats and then moved on as soon as they could.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

first-time

But seriously it is painful when someone you know closely is this way.

Care-Comrade heart-sickle

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This is me in my relationship right now. It's tough. 😔 Don't have a lot to say, except I empathize.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›