this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
208 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2384 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Talks of a possible bipartisan solution to the House Speaker standoff that has created chaos in the Republican caucus are underway, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Sunday.

“There are informal conversations that have been underway. When we get back to Washington tomorrow, it’s important to begin to formalize those discussions,” the New York Democrat said during an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

When asked what House Democrats might be asking for a deal with House Republicans, Jeffries said his caucus wants “to ensure that votes are taken on bills that have substantial Democratic support and substantial Republican support so that the extremists aren’t able to dictate the agenda.”

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The conditions for dem support aren't really all that terrible for them. End the Biden probe, equal seats on rules committee, and up or down votes on bills.

Republicans act like dems are forcing them to vote yes on an assault weapons ban and Medicare for all.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

Republicans act like dems are forcing them to vote yes on an assault weapons ban and Medicare for all.

God, if only.

I mean, at least for the Medicare For All.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Eh, I don't know that the Biden probe really hurts Dems that bad. So far i think it's just been a forum for Republicans to embarrass themselves.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Really, a condition should be that republicans should publicly admit that it was politically motivated bs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

They should concede it was a weaponization of the government to hurt Biden.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought they already had, or at least some had. I don't even think they'd care because the whole point of the Biden impeachment is to make all impeachment proceedings seem like politically motivated BS. "Oh, sure, Trump was impeached twice, but who hasn't been impeached now? It's always political." They're just trying to blunt that check against the Executive branch.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I feel most people don't realize, this is exactly what's happening, and it isn't recognized enough.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think it's about being hurt, it's about stopping the waste of time and taxpayer money on this absurd and useless distraction theater so they can actually do their fucking jobs for once.

The traitor caucus really needs the distraction theater to keep their constituents from ever being able to figure out that they're completely incompetent at doing their actual jobs. Remove the distraction and make them put up some real votes on real issues.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Nah, then they'll just endlessly campaign on "the crooked Dems forced us to shut down our investigating, what are they hiding??"

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ending the Biden probe is suicide for the MAGA fascists. Their base has become so radicalised that they can’t keep their seats if they back down one inch from prosecuting the literally evil paedophile cabal led by the Biden/Hillary/Obama hydra. I saw a recent poll that 12% of their base believes that narrative, and if they lose those voters, they’re doomed (their margins are well within that 12%).

That 12% will not compromise because any concession means conceding to literal demonic paedophiles.

They’ve hitched their horse to a plague wagon and they’ve no way to dismount without severe consequences. I do not feel bad for them.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republicans act like dems are forcing them to vote yes on an assault weapons ban and Medicare for all.

Democrats won't even vote yes on Medicare for all.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Democrats won't even vote yes on Medicare for all.

Congress should be required to use the government provided healthcare plans. Make them use Medicare/Medicaid and the problems would be solved within a couple months.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Congress should be required to use the government provided healthcare plans. Make them use Medicare/Medicaid and the problems would be solved within a couple months.

Or they would just make the coverage far more comprehensive while making it almost impossible for anyone who isn't a legislator to qualify.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Dude, Medicaid and Medicare are awesome. Why do you think seniors protect Medicare so fiercely? And Medicaid, for its faults with a lower number of providers, is still great coverage. I'd trade my high deductible plan for it tomorrow if i could.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

End the Biden probe, equal seats on rules committee, and up or down votes on bills.

Literally fascism.