167
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Lawmakers could vote for infrastructure bill, then buy stock in a concrete firm.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 33 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago

They have it backwards too. They'll buy stock, then vote on the bill that'll raise stock prices (or vice versa with shorts)

[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

If they haven't yet voted, then the bill might not pass.

In any case, upcoming bills are public knowledge. If you think a bill will pass, you too can buy the stock before the vote.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Does the bill specify who they're going to be paying the money to, though? Because an infrastructure bill saying we're going to spend a certain amount of money on these projects can predict changes in certain industries, but being on a committee and saying, "We're going to hire this specific company with this huge government contract to do this work," can tell you exactly what company is about to have a huge boost to their value.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago

Usually the committee gives the executive branch a sum of money and tells them to find someone to do the job.

Occasionally a specific company is designated by legislators. But this wouldn't be a secret, the committee meetings themselves are open to the public. And likewise when everyone votes on the bill, the name of the company would be public.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

Yeah were not getting any movement on this until people like Pelosi are far removed from any role in the democrat party. They're just gonna keep pointing and screaming at the big orange distraction because it's a lot easier than making peoples lives better.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

When it comes to making people's lives better, Democrats did more last year alone then Republicans have in the last twenty years put together.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

I agree with you. But it's important to still point out and want to fix problems even in the "better party." We can't simply be accepting of "be less bad." We need to always strive to improve. And weakening the connections between Wall Street and Washington is a big progressive goal that the old guard of Democrats have directly opposed.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Fair enough!

[-] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

Public service doesn't mean much in America.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Nothing happens in this country without someone getting paid.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
167 points (98.8% liked)

politics

18080 readers
2556 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS