Impressing everyone with how I publicly humiliated a 9 year old
this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
145 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15906 readers
560 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
I could easily win a debate against 50.000 babies
Make those cucks cry for their mommies
You, the fool: facts, logic, reason
Me, the god: "waaaahhhh, waaaaaaaaaaaahhhh, aabababababba" 
You never stood a chance
A SMUG 9 year old, bucko. 
but he has a lot to learn 
i cant tell if thats a shrunken charlie kirk face or not anymore
Contrary to popular belief, his face has been the same size since birth while his head expands geometrically
The reason they do this isn't just because it's easier to debate a child. It also reinforces the idea that everything to the left of the status quo only comes from children.
that and the fact that someone with prepared talking points can easily beat someone grabbed off the street in a debate.
I think you're right. Liberals, scratched and unscratched alike, both contend that they're The Adults In The Room and the implication is everyone else is a child.
Charlie kirk looks like someone hit random on oblivions character select screen with silly haircuts mod installed
It's actually a dev error. You see they programmed it so his head gets bigger every time he destroys a child with facts and logic, but they forgot to clip the skull to the face, so he's slowly getting weirder and weirder looking
Typical Bethesda
Eventually he will run out of children to annoy and start bothering infants instead. Maybe he'll even start arguing with fetuses, given how obsessed these people are with them.
"if you really wanted a free and independent Palestine you would get out of that incubator, checkmate"
The final frontier is him yelling at his own balls in order to debate his sperm in the marketplace of ideas.
Step 1: Hire audience plant child to raise his hand and say something half correct half wrong
Step 2: own him with facts and logic and use the wrong shit to dismiss the correct shit
step 3: film it
step 4: put it on your youtube channel
step 5: milk reactionary cottage industry with parasite audience who totally
when watching
"owning"
for endless ad revenue
they have the grift down to a science.
You also often get literal teenagers saying things that are at least half wrong, especially when you choose what does and doesn't make it to your channel.
sponsored
so tpusa paid money to promote this video?
does an extended bit in one of his books about staring down a toddler. Lamenting that he should of grabbed him and hurled him 50ft for the childs own good
UP YOURS, DADDY-O! 
"'Up yours Daddy-O.' That was his philosophy." - a toddler, with a philosophy
He used heroic effort to not do a violence after that 
My money would be on the toddler tbh
It blows my mind losers like or 
or 
have huge viewer- and listenerships when they're such embarrassing and annoying dweebs
I know they have a ton of crusty old conservative vampires pumping money into making sure their shit has reach, but still
"Who still has a lot to learn" makes it sound like he won an argument with a particularly uninformed child. Like he really is scraping the bottom of the barrel of debate opponents.
Yeah it does. A major aspect of people only ever seeing kids saying left stuff is part of the perception used to pretend we are children and that people grow out of it as they get older. I am not sure how to break it or even if it would be beneficial to do so, part of me thinks the way they ridicule young people so much partly causes them to be so disconnected from influence and that hands over a lot of them to us. Provided that they don't move rightwards due to material conditions they stay with us too.
Andrew Tate and Sneako do groom young boys though
SMUG
"Very cool adult man argues with a child"
The more I look at the thumbnail the harder I laugh; it's so true.
Nothing personnel kid
Sorry, only child actors have that haircut. Plant in the audience. Regardless the fact that you can beat a child in an argument doesn't mean much.
Maybe these days. When I was a kid at least like 50% of white boys had their hair about as close to that as they could get
Same, but we live on different times.
I wish I could play little league now. I'd be way than before.
Charlie looks like he just saw himself in the mirror and immediately regretted getting that haircut.
if he could feel shame he would not do this for a living
What if instead it was Chris Farley Kirk?