this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
375 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18672 readers
2765 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 74 points 8 months ago

I guess I’ll sit here and wait patiently while absolutely nothing happens to him.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 8 months ago (2 children)

And yet, last I checked, she still refuses to stop identifying as a Republican.

The GOP is evil. If you identify as a member, you are also evil.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I just listened to an interview with her and NPR on 1A. She’s being incredibly direct in criticizing both the party and specific republicans. Now, you can def argue it’s a little too late but I’ll give her credit for not toeing the party line nowadays…for whatever little it might be worth.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 8 months ago

She's also laying the groundwork for splitting the party, with her suggesting she could make a third party run for 2024. I was thinking last night that if she was to do that, and get Chris Christie to be the VP pick, that could actually add a lot of stability to the political landscape. Would they win? Probably not, but it would take a lot of wind out of the sails of the fascists, and they wouldn't win, either. But it would give today's Republican voters who still hold dear the core principles of democracy a place to not feel politically homeless.

If the goal is preventing an openly fascist American government, Liz Cheney must run.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

GOP has been evil longer than Liz Cheny has been, though. Yet she still enthusiastically joined their ranks. ALL of her current actions are trying to clean and fix their reputation by aiming to expel the loudest and most obvious of their members because those most obvious members are revealing the true goals of the party instead of maintaining the kayfabe that keeps them civilly acceptable.

ALL of the GOP are correctly self-identifying conservatives. They want to maintain traditional values and power structures, even if those traditions stand in the way of fairness, progress, or justice. If they cared more about individual liberties than traditional values, they'd be liberals. If they cared more about the progress of society than traditional values, they'd be progressives. If they cared more about the social good of the nation, they'd be socialists. They tell you firmly and clearly they are none of these things, and they are right.

To be conservative MEANS you do not want a fair, just, sustainable, and successful society. It means you care more about tribe than anything else. To self-identify as conservative is no different than to say you hate and wish to make suffer anyone who doesn't resemble and support you.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The GOP evil goes back to the founding of this country. Slavers gonna slave.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I know what you're getting at here, but the way you phrased it is 100% wrong. The Republican Party was founded in 1854 as an expressly anti-slavery party.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

The Republican party hasn't been the party of Lincoln in decades. If you want to find something close to a 1854 Republican, you've got to look at the Democrats.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

That's just semantic nonsense. The conservative movement in this country is all that matters. Labels are for cereal boxes.

Unless those people are still alive, what labels have been applied previously are irrelevant.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the most pitiful refuge of the factually incorrect: iTs JuSt SemAnTiCs.

Just admit you were wrong and do better. We all make mistakes.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

I wouldn't be surprised if she's stuck in a no true Scotsman fallacy. "She's a real Republican, its the Trumpers who have betrayed the values and don't belong." Despite that it's the majority of them doing that.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Ohio is a stupid fucking place if Jordan is the best you got

[–] [email protected] 40 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There's a reason why the majority of the US's astronauts are from Ohio.

That place sucks so bad, people want to leave the fucking planet.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Having a naval academy helps with meeting selection criteria.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Ohio has a naval academy?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Actually, the real answer is that Wright-Patterson AFB is there, and that the Dayton area has a strong aviation history.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago

He's not, it's just gerrymandered to shit here.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yea and I bet Gym Jordan has ties to Nazis in California.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ya, what about those Illinois NAZIs

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I hate Illinois NAZIs

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Indictments be flowin' like dolla bills

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Gym Jordan is truly sketchy. When is that documentary coming out, anyway?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Damn. As of just checking… her book is sold out at Amazon…

Damn. I wonder if I can find a copy floating by on the open seas

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There are some interesting snippets in there about what she learned about how the Dem party operates vs the Republicans from when she was part of the Jan 6th committee.

In the Dems' case, the reps themselves do a lot of the work - they're actual lawyers and qualified people who can dig into the substance of an issue and go through the details in a knowledgeable way. The reps, in contrast, rely on staffers for most everything that isn't the most basic understanding. She said that the difference between how the Dem and Rep parties operate are like night and day.

I think the snippet is included as part of Lawrence O'Donnell's interview with Nancy Pelosi last night, but I might be wrong. I watched a lot of Liz Cheney talking on the news last, and heard a lot of snippets from her audiobook yesterday as well, so I'm not 100% sure, but I think the source is either Lawrence or Nicole Wallace's show.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

deleted by creator