112
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Takes that are definitely not gonna age like milk maduro-coffee

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 79 points 7 months ago

Meanwhile NATO is just looking for a nice small curb-stomp war they can fight, to prove their military isn't a paper tiger like Russia's proved to be.

Russia's military "proved to be" a paper tiger (okay) against NATO weapons and strategy, but NATO needs to prove themselves. Do people read the shit they write?

[-] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They really really miss the all time high dopamine hit of Desert Storm.

[-] [email protected] 75 points 7 months ago

hate how they say "we will" and "we cut". he really imagines himself sitting in the war room with the generals as they strategise on how to fuck shit up

[-] [email protected] 46 points 7 months ago

The neoliberal hierarchy is

  • POTUS
  • Generals
  • CIA
  • MIC
  • Lanyard advisors
  • Bankers
  • Executives
  • Stenographers
  • Pundits
  • Twitter personalities
  • Twitch streamers
  • Military analyst writing on forums on his break at Nordstrom
[-] [email protected] 38 points 7 months ago

It's the same insufferable mentality in some sports fans.

[-] [email protected] 72 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Maduro, seriously

READ. 👏 THE. 👏 ROOM. 👏

only NATO is allowed to have oil, didn't you get the memo??

[-] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago

Lol guy thinks Maduro's going to read his post like the president of Venezuela has time to obsessively google himself.

[-] [email protected] 69 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Ugh. My least favourite type of smug liberal. The "We're just itching for the opportunity to murder millions so don't give us that excuse (but we're still morally superior to you despite that.)" kind of guy.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago

I despise these neoliberal MIC fanboys too. Send everyone who posts like this to fight the wars they so badly want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 55 points 7 months ago

I know we say this all the time, but these fuckers are so goddamn smug, when they literally contribute nothing to global politics. Peak "my dad will beat up your dad" energy even though this guy is probably around 35. It's like they practice being as insufferable as fucking possible.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago

Watch these guys any time they have to drive through an inner city at night or even the day. They're the type to take one look at a black guy walking down the straight and immediately begin hyperventilating.

[-] [email protected] 48 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

maybe-later-kiddo Babe, its time for your 4pm regime-change planning session. Get another OAS conference call together so we can talk about overthrowing the Venezuelan government again.

yes-honey-left Yes, honey.

prove their military isn't a paper tiger like Russia's proved to be

Uh... huh.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Russia is a paper tiger and we're curb stomping them but also NATO is desperate to curb stomp someone to show they're not a a paper tiger (like Russia, who we're curb stomping)

[-] [email protected] 45 points 7 months ago

"We're going to beat you like we beat Russia" seems to suggest Venezuela will control a solid third of Guyanese territory within the next two years.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago

These libs probably think Xi also looks himself up to see what racist memes the smug libs are posting about him xinternet

[-] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

Russia is a paper tiger with the world's worst tech! Unlike those strong Aryan Ukranians who used... Wait, what sort of weapons to defend themselves?

[-] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

Our enemy will never stop finding was to be simultaneously too strong and too weak, and neither will we

[-] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago

You know you're on the right side of history when you start ranting about how this colony belongs to France.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

When in fact it doesn't. The French might well have a political interest in preventing this but they don't own this part.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 41 points 7 months ago

based on how little media attention this is getting i don't think the burger alliance is too keen to get involved

✨❗🚨 this is a vibes based reading 🚨❗✨

[-] [email protected] 34 points 7 months ago

Yeah i would expect VUVUSELA EMPIRE MADUROTLER EBIL INVASION to be blared 24/7 to take the libs goldfish attention span from Palestine

[-] [email protected] 41 points 7 months ago

lmao, this guy thinks javelins grow on trees

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 37 points 7 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago

If France couldn't do shit to Burkina Faso it can't do shit about Guyana.

Britain's aircraft carriers can currently only carry helicopters.

The US has given its entire stockpiles of land war weapons to Ukraine. And is giving its entire stockpile of air war weapons to Israel.

I sincerely believe that the empires have never been this overstretched in recent history. Not since ww2 or the losses of the British empire.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago

Guyana =/= French Guyana.

The first is an independent state since 1966 and a former British colony inhabited by a mix of Indian (indeed Hinduism is the plurality religion), black and native people situated to the west of Suriname and bordering Brazil and Venezuela. It has had a nominally socialist government since even before independence, though I do admittedly not know much about the country's politics.

French Guiana is NOT independent and is part of France. The population is majority black, with a large presence of white Europeans (compared to less than 1% in Guyana) and is largely important for the French/ESA space program. It borders Brazil and Suriname.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah so is it even relevant? It has a whole ass country in between. Maybe in the sense that a hot war would affect it economically and with refugees?

[-] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago

French Guyana? I doubt it. Also I doubt there'd be much of a grand scale of fighting. Guyana has an army of 4500 people. Venezuela's is much large.

The question is, if the US would decide to enforce the Monroe Doctrine by force and invade.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago

China... Doesn't want anything you have.

Ahh yes China, famous non-buyers of oil.

Read the room

Unrelated tangent: there's a concept in Japanese called "空気を読む" (Kuuki wo yomu) which literally translates as "read the air" but basically means "read the room". I have seen multiple white dudes go on long angry rants on separate occasions about how it's "unfair" that the Japanese are being "so indirect" and "won't just say what they mean". Real bruh shit.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago
[-] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

China has a bigger presence than they think. This idiot doesn't know shit about South America. Guyana isn't Belize. It hasn't been a Commonwealth nation for while. Not that they would give enough of a shit to send troops across the Atlantic. And why would France get involved? They couldn't even handle Niger and Mali.

Best case scenario is that you get a repeat of Vietnam with soldiers being murdered in guerrilla warfare right before suffering from Malaria and climate change-induced heat strokes.

Edit: So apparently Guyana IS a Commonwealth nation while choosing to no longer have the Queen remain as head of state.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago

Forgetting someone? kim-drip-too-hard

[-] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago

You have taken psychic damage

[-] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago

So this post is massively smug about it... but isn't there a bit of accuracy to it, too? Like, what's to stop the US from ratcheting up the tension so that they have something to distract from Israel and the stagnant Ukrainian front?

[-] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago

There is only so many times you can start a new proxy war to distract from the other proxy wars going poorly.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 7 months ago

Well, not with that attitude.

I’m sure it could fairly easily be stretched to 6 layered proxie wars and by the time you get to number 7 probably at least one of the previous ones would be wrapping up.

You just gotta go in with that old can do Kissinger attitude!

[-] [email protected] 22 points 7 months ago

harry potter and the seven proxy wars

[-] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Barack Obama got peace nobel for something like 6 so that's a strong contender.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

Good luck, I'm behind seven proxies!

[-] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago

I figure that ratcheting up tension still requires resources that are being steadily depleted by both ukraine and israel. Consider the various stories about the difficulty of supplying aide to both nations at once, and consider how it would be even harder to have a third straw in the milkshake, so to speak.

It's not impossible the US could do something though, I just think they're genuinely stretched a bit thin right now.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago

Do not underestimate Biden’s desire to start fights with the entire world. The man’s going out with a bang.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago

NATO failed to beat Russia. Who knows how weak they really are, now?

[-] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Others have said munitions shortages, and while that would be a consideration in a long war the US could definitely degrade Venezuela using existing active stocks. The real problem is more serious.

The US has 9 active carrier strike groups, Due to maintenance, logistics and rotation issues (as well as keeping a home fleet for each ocean), this means it can have 3 carrier groups ready for active operations at any time.

1 has to be in the Pacific for obvious Geopolitical reasons. 2 are chilling off Israel/ The Black Sea, They in theory could get one from Japan or San Diego, but the only real one available is CVN71, which is undergoing sea trials for the F35 and isn't staffed or stocked for deployment. They're fucked unless they want to abandon the gulf (and let Yemen hoist the pirate flag on Israeli shipping.) or Abandon the Mediterranean (and let the Russian Pacific or Baltic fleets reinforce the Black Sea as soon as they can pay off Turkey)

They got nothing unless they have international support either for intervention, or for taking over a role supporting Israel, which is politically untenable.

The real question is if the French (who own the slice next door) lack chill. Bet they've been waiting to try out their shiny pocket carrier.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

Bet they’ve been waiting to try out their shiny pocket carrier.

I doubt they will do anything, there's not much anything for them in it, they have unrest at home and they partially stripped their regular army weapons to send them to Ukraine. They didn't do anything against Niger which is much more important to them, so it's even less likely they will move even the Navy to the other side of Atlantic.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago

what's to stop the US from ratcheting up the tension so that they have something to distract from Israel and the stagnant Ukrainian front?

They gave their entire land war stockpile to Ukraine and are in the process of giving their entire air war stockpile to Israel. What's stopping them is a very real limitation on resources.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago

Recalling all the chuds in the 1980s who thought the UK was gonna do a land invasion of Argentina.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

Anyone who posts with any level of smug confidence about the outcome of military operations online needs to be dunked in a toilet.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
112 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15789 readers
546 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS