politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Vice president Trump. Lol
Jfc why tho
Ever read Transmetropolitan?
The Beast vs. the Smiler.
Is this the Only Trump in Village ?
Like three times, and then said he'd beat Trump a second later...
I don't think he realized.
He didn't.
And that will be used against him too. Not only did he make the gaffe, he didn't even realize he made the gaffe.
(And for the record, it's sad that voters are holding Biden to a much higher standard than Trump. But here we are.)
Dude.
It's sad that this is the standard we're holding Biden too...
You know what a momma cat does when it can't feed all the kittens? It carries the runt off and abandons it
The Republican party is the runt, we can't save both and the Dem party has the best chance of surviving.
Why waste valuable time and effort calling on trump to step down? He's literally never going to do it and there's zero chance republicans go against him
Because the average voter is an idiot and only hearing the Biden dementia stuff makes them more likely to vote for the orange fascist because they haven't heard nor care about project 2025 and don't remember their basic elementary school history lessons.
Except that's been the whole point of this exercise from day one!
The voters on the right have proven that they have NO standards that a candidate needs to live up to, while the voters on the left are the ones who are screaming "we need to have high standards for the people who are going to run the country"
Until recently, while the left would have preferred an even better candidate, Biden at least just barely fell above the seemingly minimum bar, especially when compared against Trump. But now Biden seems to have fallen right to the cusp of where the voters who still have standards are wondering if he's fallen below them, and if there's might be a better option, both from the standpoint of meeting their standards, and the standpoint of actually being able to win against Trump, who MUST lose for our nation to avoid disaster.
Trump already fails even lower standards. In fact, I can't think of any serious standard that Trump doesn't fail.
"don't be a jackass" Fail.
"don't be a fascist." double fail.
"Be human." Tripple fail.
"don't be a rapist". fail-tacular.
"Don't be a child rapist"... Failing-spree.
In any case, I think a lot of people are afraid of trump winning- and with very good cause, so Biden has a lot of scrutiny. "I beat him before" doesn't really hold water. he squeaked that under the wire in four states, any 3 of which flipping would have given it to trump. (PA, AZ, GA, CO,) and plenty of others were pretty damn close, too. Trump has had 4 years to improve his image and energize his base. Biden is less popular than he was in 2020. Anyone whose not worried is gonna have a rude awakening, I think.
If you have no intention of ever supporting Trump, it doesn't matter what he does. It would be nice if the not Trump option wasn't so similar in age and mental capacity.
Oh please, he will always have a dump truck more mental capacity than Trump.
He's been a gaffe machine his entire life. I don't think that's a sign of an old, decrepit mind, but the sign that the same Biden who referred to his running mate in 2008 as "Barack America" and his running mate's opponent as "George" (rather than John McCain) is running for President in 2024. I think I like his answer. "You can either watch what I say during a high-pressure interview for 90 minutes, or you can watch what I did for 3.5 years with a staunch opposition throwing out the road blocks every chance they got. But if you vote against me, you get Project 2025. You might want to look that up before you cast your vote."