this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
100 points (98.1% liked)

traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns

997 readers
192 users here now

Welcome to /c/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns, an anti-capitalist meme community for transgender and gender diverse people.

  1. Please follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct

  2. Selfies are not permitted for the personal safety of users.

  3. No personal identifying information may be posted or commented.

  4. Stay on topic (trans/gender stuff).

  5. Bring a trans friend!

  6. Any image post that gets 200 upvotes with "banner" or "rule 6" in the title becomes the new banner.

  7. Posts about dysphoria/trauma/transphobia should be NSFW tagged for community health purposes.

  8. When made outside of NSFW tagged posts, comments about dysphoria/traumatic/transphobic material should be spoiler tagged.

  9. Arguing in favor of transmedicalism is unacceptable. This is an inclusive and intersectional community.

  10. While this is mostly a meme community, we allow most trans related posts as we grow the trans community on the fediverse.

If you need your neopronouns added to the list, please contact the site admins.

Remember to report rulebreaking posts, don't assume someone else has already done it!

Matrix Group Chat:

Suggested Matrix Client: Cinny

https://matrix.to/#/#tracha:chapo.chat

WEBRINGS:

๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธ Transmasculine Pride Ring ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธ

โฌ…๏ธ Left ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ Be Crime Do Gay Webring ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ Right โžก๏ธ

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

her,,, expolde

Join our puplic Matrix server! https://matrix.to/#/#tracha:chapo.chat


As a reminder, be sure to properly give content warnings and put sensitive subjects behind proper spoiler tags. It's for the mental health of not just your comrades, but yourself as well.

Here is a screenshot of where to find the spoiler button.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

it's an easy way to drive exploration in the level. you spread the collectibles out and put them in a lot of semi-hidden areas to force people into those spots

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

brow Game's levels aren't good enough to motivate exploring during completion on their own?

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

not for a 7 year old who has been drinking surge since they were in the womb, no

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

In Super Mario World, you might go down a green pipe because there could be one of those slotmachine rooms in it, with a chance to get a cape feather... The SM64 equivalent would be pressing down on the dpad on every single pipe in case a star is hiding there...

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

game design in 2d and 3d environments is fundamentally different though. i can't even remember a level with an open vertical pipe to be honest

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sonic games did not become collectathons, until HD Unleashed ruined it at least.......

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

both sonic adventures had a scoring component based on the amount of rings you collected during the level as well as a mission mode in 2 that had you going back through the levels to collect things

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ranks aren't exclusively ring-based though and rings aren't ever required for progression. You can collect stuff in the Adventure games, up to and including Emblems, but it's all a side thing, right? It helps you score better or supports side game stuff, but it's not the core focus. Core focus is Gotta Go Fast, whereas SM64 legit locks you out of stages without ร— amounts of stars.

(I know I'm so hateful :3)

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

like i said, red coin and 100 coin stars aren't required for completion. you need a total of 70 stars to complete the game. if you beat every level except for the coin stuff, you'd still come out with 75 stars, more than enough to get to the final stage

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

No but stars are, so yeah you basically have to do a pretty obnoxious amount of collecting. 75 stars is like 60% of the total star count. The point of it is making number go up. Quick, imagine if Celeste had Strawberry Doors in front of each chapter and you had to get a certain amount of strawbs to advance? If you needed 100 out of 180 strawbs to advance.... fun?

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

you can't really compare a 3d game made in 1992 with a 2010s 2d platformer though. for what it's worth, i think things can just be not to your taste without them being bad. like i really didn't enjoy celeste but i'm not gonna say it's a bad game because of the things i didn't like

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

makima-huh what 3d game made in 1992, Wolfenstein 3D? But also why not? Both platformers. You can also put this collecting logic on Megaman X and it's the same problem.

Fwiw I didn't enjoy Celeste either, mostly its last chapter is just cock n ball torture for no reason. I like the base game okay. And yeah I guess, but then every single 3D platformer was a Rareware game or a Mario 64 clone for like a decade after that. Making jumping games be about making number go up by collecting stuff reminds me of MMO design or lootgrinding, just busywork to make numbers go up, a fundamentally timewasting design. Missing the point that the joy of motion is what made platformers fun... Missing the forest for the trees..

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

oh sorry, 1996, but still. that game is almost enough to have been teen pregnant with a middle schooler. it's like i was saying earlier, 3d games and 2d games are fundamentally different and comparing them like it's apples to apples does both of them a disservice. 3d environments are much more detailed and require careful exploration sometimes and that's why you get small hints like trails of coins leading to areas out of the way.

for what it's worth, you can't really blame mary-oh 64 for every game after it copying it and just adding more shit to collect. that's kinda what i was getting at as well; there are only 3 categories of things to collect: regular coin, red coin, star. it also had some of the tighest controls a 3d platformer had in that era so i give it some grace

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

3d games and 2d games are fundamentally different

Curuously though, this type of collection kleptomania was grafted directly onto Sonic in Unleashed and everyone hated it to death. There's nothing about being 3d that means focusing your game entirely around collecting garbage is a good idea. For example:

3d environments are much more detailed and require careful exploration sometimes and that's why you get small hints like trails of coins

Stuff like this is totally fine and I agree, it also doesn't explain why they had to lock you out of levels with star doors, telling you to screw off and go grab more trash?

you can't really blame mary-oh 64 for every game after it copying it and just adding more shit to collect.

It is the one that started it though, right? Weirdly its direct predecessor would be european micro platformers, like the Dizzy series or Flimbo's quest which require you to collect trash the same way. Most people don't love those, and yet when Mario 64 does it...? But the flood of mediocre 3D platformers padding their runtime comes right after SM64 came out emilie-shrug

And it does have tight controls, that's what's more confusing: Mario 64 would have made a good enough normal platformer because the moveset and movement are great, and yet they made it so that collecting refuse was the only point?

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

that's not the only point though. go through the objectives in every level, most of them are doing some kind of weird shit to change the environment in some way. your issue is with two stars in each level that aren't necessary to complete the game

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No that isn't my issue, my issue is with the entire point being do thing -> get stars -> unlock doors.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

what else would be the point? without objectives and ways to mark progression, you're playing only up 64

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

what else would be the point?

Well, what was the point of every Mario game prior? World wasn't about collecting dragon coins, to my memory. Platformers to that point had been effectively obstacle courses about overcoming the challenge laid out for you. They didn't need a skinner-box rat-and-cheese number-go-up extrinsic motivator to get you to play, just traversing the levels was fun because jumping on and over stuff was fun, defeating enemies was fun. Top examples are Mega Man X, the first Castlevania, indeed Super Mario Bros 3, Sonic the Hedgehog 2, Kirby's Adventure. None of these games needed to be "GRAB ALL THE STUFF", anything you could collect in these games was either supportive of the core gameplay (subweapons and hearts in Castlevania, armour and sub-tanks in Mega Man X) or purely for score. Gating your game's progression based on arbitrary collectibles was an absurd idea built purely to pad a game, and you can see what a bad idea it was in Symphony of the Night as well. It's a bad bit and I think there's a good reason most games dropped it. The level design in SM64 and its ilk also get warped to this purpose and mean that without their silly collectables there would be literally no point. A Mario 64 that's just "get to the end" would be an hour long game. And why*? Because they decided that platforming being fun on its own wasn't enough somehow.

*it's cartridge space, again. they padded the runtime because more levels wouldn't have fit lol

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

If your point is that I'm annoying and won't shut the fuck up you are correct