this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
262 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19016 readers
3585 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In the month of February, Donald Trump finally neared the start of his general election campaign against Joe Biden—while burning through his political operation’s coffers for even more cash to support his legal defenses.

On Wednesday night, Trump’s “Save America” leadership PAC—the political committee that now functions primarily as his legal slush fund—reported paying lawyers $5.6 million last month, according to Federal Election Commission filings. That’s well above the $5 million total the PAC raised in the same period.

The PAC also deferred payment on more than half a million dollars in additional fees to Alina Habba, who represented Trump in both of his milestone court losses in New York this year, while racking up a $645,000 bill to a company tasked with managing legal records in his business fraud case.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago (1 children)

.... that's like. half a bond. what are they spending it on?

[–] [email protected] 51 points 6 months ago (2 children)

230K a day x 29 days is only $6,670,000, or 1.43% of his $464M bond. :)

To hit half of $464M they would need to be burning $8M a day for 29 days.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Right. I should not math before caff.

lol.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

You and me both!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

The article says the total was more than $6.9 million, or $238,000 a day. The title is apparently heavily rounded down.

However I'm not sure if that's quite accurate as it does mention deferred payments. The main lawyer fees paid were $5.6 million, which alone is more than the $5 million the PAC raised that month.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago (3 children)

On Tuesday, Trump’s “Save America” leadership political action committee reported raising just $8,508 from donors in the entire month of January, while spending about $3.9 million, according to a new filing with the Federal Election Commission.

Two things: First, LMAO they only raised $8,508 in a month? They would have been better off opening a lemonade stand.

Second, remember when Trump first announced his candidacy and said he'd be paying for his campaign using his own personal money? How far we've come since then.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

The 'pay for it himself' lasted a couple of months. iirc he spent about $50 million priming the pump and then began accepting donations.

BTW, Trump once claimed he'd invented the term "priming the pump"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Remember when Trump offered to pay for legal fees for his supporters?

Turned out not that by 300%

[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago

The PAC also deferred payment on more than half a million dollars in additional fees to Alina Habba, who represented Trump in both of his milestone court losses in New York this year, while racking up a $645,000 bill to a company tasked with managing legal records in his business fraud case.

Why do I get the feeling Ms. Habba is never getting that money? She could sue, I suppose, but she'd be in the back of a long line of people doing the same.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

And? what are the republiQans gonna do about it?

Ha! Yeah, that's what I thought.

Anyway. Someone mentioned coffee . . .

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You know, in hindsight, you'd have to be an idiot to turn down being Trump's lawyer. Absolutely tons of money, and you'll have no moral worries when you decide to intentionally throw the case.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Better get a retainer and jump as soon as it's burned up.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Someone explain one thing to me - how could paying these bills not be considered coordination with the candidate?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

My guess it is, but it is "good for everyone", since they can campaign less, hence the more money goes to Trump, the more seats Dems get.