this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
75 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13392 readers
907 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's not a word that can, or should be, "reclaimed".

Dunking on chuds/libs/etc. is awesome, but it doesn't need that specific framing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 81 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Just because it's ok to do something to an adult doesn't mean it's ok to do that same thing to a child. Many such cases.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 3 months ago

Drake is in shambles

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Adults are never bullied in harmful ways clueless

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes obviously what I meant is its always ok to bully adults nothing has been clearer

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i mean you literally said "it's ok to do something to an adult" where 'do something' means bullying. if you want to present a more nuanced view than that you should phrase it in accordance.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It is ok to bully an adult, that doesn't mean it's ok to bully every adult get outta here with this.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 3 months ago (4 children)

There’s actually zero difference between good and bad things. You imbecile. You fucking moron.

Bullying bad people who deserve it and have shitty beliefs to be bullied out of is good. Bullying innocent children for things they cannot control is bad. Context matters.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

I can see a line of argument where a 4th grader shouldn't be bullied even for things they can control. They'd hardly know better because of their mushy, young, little mind. In that sense, the bullying is only the harmful part of getting the message across. Therefore there'd be a desire to separate the connotations of bullying from the good work of rattling the chains of people who are responsible for harm.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"Any time I think of killing, I think of throttling a toddler while their parents have to watch. So let's not use killing to describe what we want to do to Nazis."

Sorry but this is a stupid, pointless argument to have. Context matters.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yea I'm going to assume the 4th grader wasn't being bullied because of his dogsgit political takes that came striaght from a wapo op ed about how safety regulations are actually detrimental to the working class.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I would totally strangle baby hitler while his parents watch

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I wouldn't explain to them why I am doing it either, yea

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 3 months ago

Context matters.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 months ago

.... if you search the most riducules way of framing something to then make it a problem you can then beeing concerned about..... its not a problem , the most ridicules way of framing you applied is the problem.

and Bullying works . You will not relate bulling fascist out of their opinion on an online forum with" Sucide Cases in Highschool" anymore even if you are ridicules enough to draw this connection..

Drawing this conection is real not acceptable , and if you do it you appear as somebody searching and Stirring for Drama.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 months ago

maybe using the 'punching up' vs 'punching down' language would be some helpful context?

geordi-no "Bullying Down"

geordi-yes "Bullying Up"

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago

I would never use a gui-better on a fourth grader

[–] [email protected] 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s because the chuds complain “I’m being bullied” that the term is used.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago

Yes, chuds are 'cry bullies'.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If we can bully some fascists into suicide that would be ok by me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 months ago

Yeah every time you're about to bully a fascist, simply shoot them instead.

No more half measures Walter

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago

we have dozens of emotes which are direct references to murder, and a site culture that constantly celebrates righteous political violence, but bullying is a bridge too far?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Hot take, but to be honest, the whole 'bullying works' thing always came off as quite lame.

It's online discourse. You don't seem tough. You seem like the leftist stereotype of a keyboard warrior.

The chances are, a lot of leftists were probably on the 'bullied' side of the spectrum - more so than the right wing kids who were more likely to have been the bully. This could be too much extrapolation, but sometimes it seems like some deeper psychological impulse to enact justice on behalf of your younger self, and feel powerful.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

I don't think it makes the poster cool by any means, but it's an effective way to deal with chuds sealioning or concern trolling. Often their shitty arguments aren't worthy of being engaged, and you don't want them to have free momentum. Hence, harass them till they are either banned or quit.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

The flip side to seeming like a "leftist stereotype of a keyboard warrior" is seeming like a civility fetishist who scolds people for being mean to literal self proclaimed fascists.

If we're going to meaningfully oppose the rising tide of fascism in this country we may need to get a little thicker skin then being upset on the behalf of the enemy for calling them a dork.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

more so than the right wing kids who were more likely to have been the bully

I don't think that rings true tbh. Like sure, right wing as per definition of a leftist, but if your schoolmates perceived you as right wing, good chance you were bullied for being a fucking loser

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Depends on school culture, more rural and suburban schools definitely have a very conservative dominant culture typically. Also in Canada hockey players take the role of the athletic kids and hockey tends to have a very reactionary culture compared to other sports

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The point I've failed to make here is that this doesn't register as right-wing to the given community, it registers as normal. I think nigh everybody who would register as right-wing to a rural or suburban school or canadian hockey players is going to get bullied for it because after that dominant culture it's all just loser shit like talking about phrenology or whatever

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Ah okay I see that makes sense, the kid who gets into esoteric fascism and Evola definitely gets bullied

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

anytime i hear about 'sex' i think of the time i was abused but you don't see me making my personal hangups into a Big Dramatic Criticism Of Hexbear Sitewide Culture.

Most people hear 'bullying' and think of like low stakes teasing and stuff, not child suicide. Its not this sites specific leftist attempt to 'reclaim' the word 'bullying', it is literally just english speakers using the word as usual with its usual meaning and context which does not include child suicide. absolutely no one here advocates for children committing suicide and it is borderline wrecker behavior to suggest as much. This is shock value emotional manipulation to associate hexbear with child suicide for no good reason whatsoever.

idk if you are intentionally wrecking but to the passive observer you are equating the mild criticism of the online posts of others with advocating for literal child deaths, that is absolutely ridiculous.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I object to comparing bullying libs and nazis to this. They're different things and everyone understands that.

I don't see why the word matters. I was bullied, I'd wager half the people here experienced some form of bullying as a kid. That doesn't change the fact that "cancel culture" "brigading" and generally being rude shits to people online with intent to get a social reaction out of them that is positive (they fuck off, apologise, delete accounts, never do it again, etc etc etc) is accurate to describe as bullying. It is bullying in service of good, this is bullying in service of bad. They're quite easily understood as different things.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

Yea exactly this.

When I went to youth program in the next town over because it was free for my family kids literally threw rocks at me and would shove me I to shale so I'd get cut up and then the counselors would grab me if I tried to retaliate because they were the older brothers of the kids bullying me and we'd both get in the same amount of trouble.

Don't have much patience for people telling me calling self avowed nazis stupid assholes makes me as bad as them.

People here fundamentally understand the difference between punching up and punching down. Otherwise they wouldn't be here.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago

Bullying works. Shooting people works too. What matters is the target.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We advocate for the barbara-pit here, why not make them (CW: suicide via gun)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Ops argument is literally reddits excuse for why the original sub got banned.

Because we were being mean to hypothetical historical slave owners.

If it upsets you go back to r/politicalhumor pretty sure they've got rules about enforcing civility on libs and fascists too, op should feel right at home

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

On one hand fucking with random children sucks, but on the other hand turning cruelty back on the cruel is all i aspire to and my only real end goal. Shithead world

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

no shot this is sincere lmao

take your bait and fuck off

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It is actually. I was bullied when I was younger and it fucked me up, which is why it makes me uncomfortable seeing the word used positively.

Some here are taking a bad faith interpretation like I'm saying "BULLYING NAZIS IS LIKE BULLYING THIS CHILD!1!1" when it should be pretty obvious that's not what I'm getting at. I feel there's a bullying culture in society at large that enables bullying, not just of children but indeed adults too, and that uses of the word like this aren't helping.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

Im sorry that u had this experience... u should not moralise the word "bullying" and focus more on who is the target.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Strong agree.

When I was first checking out r/chapotraphouse it was really alienating to see bullying being referred to so positively. Why was a community that’s so disproportionately queer and neurodiverse lauding the merits of bullying when we’re so much more likely to be the victims?

We pretty much only use the word bullying when we’re talking about punching up, harassing horrible people in power or shutting down fascists and liberals. I think it’s a form of immunisation, a way of preempting accusations of horrible people that they’re being bullied for their harmful selfish bigotry with “yeah we’re bullying you so what”. It disarms the accusation and looks really strong/funny to outsiders, because the power differential between the people who’re crying they’re being “bullied” by us and the people who’re bullying them, or how socially accepted the (awful, harmful) views they’re claiming to hold are compared to the views they say we’re “bullying” them for not having. It’s really really funny when actual elected officials or Op Ed writers with huge readerships whine about being bullied by a crowd of posters with names like Ho_Chi_Minx and ✨StanStalin✨ and it makes them look weak and us look strong.

When we talk about what would more commonly be considered bullying, punching down on people who’re different because they’re different, like (I imagine, thank you for the CW I did not need to read that today) is reported on in the article you linked and many of us experience or have experienced daily we tend to use words like harassment, micro-aggressions, abuse, discrimination and trans/homophobia to describe what we’re going through. Whenever someone posts here about the bullying they’ve experienced, either as a child or an adult, there is almost without exception an outpouring of sympathy, compassion, outrage commiseration and support, and anything out of line is usually shut down almost immediately not just by the mod team (who can’t be everywhere at once) but by the willingness of almost everyone here to bully anyone trying to make this an unsafe space for our marginalised comrades into silence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah Hexbear has a problem with "being normal". Always has, it's why the podcast wanted to distance themselves from the r/chapotraphouse subreddit.

Really think about what "bullying works!" with no context added would look like to a normie. Complete insanity. I want to distance myself from this site whenever it gets brought up.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

If you insist on stripping all context from sonmething to decide if you should get upset about it or not I'm pretty happy our "bullying" is driving those people away.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm with you but

"Causing intentional social discomfort and osticization in response to unacceptable antisocial positions and actions"

is a bit of a mouth full

What do you suggest instead

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

commenters: please consider, while the comparison to what is effectively child murder is unhelpful and inaccurate, there is a genuine complaint to be made here. The site culture created by the “bullying works” mindset is hostile and deeply stressful for neurodivergent people in general. I kind of wish this discussion didn’t enter the site zeitgeist this way, considering that the issue isn’t really about bullying in general but moreso the bad application of it (we think being armed is good too, but we always recommend good gun discipline!), but it’s been needed to have been had for a long time and- unless I’m mistaken- it has been had before and many neurodivergent moderators and volunteers left the team due to a lack of proper action on it. I urge anyone reading this to go past the immediate, reactionary urge to dismiss the issue altogether (and do understand I sympathize with it given the OP’s extremely hyperbolic nature), and try and understand the criticism (many of, there are always outliers) us neurodivergent users have been making for a long time.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

what-time-is-it

As much as the concept of bullying libs, lolbertarians and other chuds is funny, I do wonder about using the term while schools in the western world do jack shit about bullying amongst their student populace...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

People here bully for the same reason anyone else bullies: cruelty without consequence makes the bully feel powerful. The idea that bullying is "praxis" or whatever is self-justifying delusion. Nobody who can explain at length why individual voting in bourgeois elections is a waste of time genuinely believes that they're doing more to improve material conditions by seeking out the safest possible environment to perform focused personal cruelty without negative social feedback. People do it because it's fun for them. It's a hobby. People don't want to be told not to enjoy their shameful treat, so they come up with tortured excuses about why their indulgence is actually a selfless public service.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (6 children)

No it's because it's easier to say "stfu nerd" then to engage with the idea the reason were mean to fascists and bigots is because we're desperate for "a need to feel powerful"

No it's because those people suck and they should be shamed for their shitty bigoted opinions.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

"bullying works" i remind myself, as i call a sitting senator with grandkids an "incel"

load more comments
view more: next ›