bzzt crackle bzzt

I feel like this may need a cw for racism, this is pretty mask off even for Walsh.

Lots of Rezzes are rough but some are actually flourishing because they put a bunch of that casino money toward things like social programs, scholarships, cultural revitalization, language preservation, infrastructure etc. But I wouldn't expect nuance from a racist sexist nerd like Matt Walsh.

I would like to see these two chucklefucks try to shut down a reservation

Just show up and overpower the stone age civilizations

I sincerely hope he gets kicked in the head by a horse.

Forget the Russians, western whites are the orcs.

"Me strong....you weak. Big strong man...take from weak!"

Isn't he the guy that abused his pregnant wife?

Oh my bad it was crowder.

Well you can't blame me because all of these guys are pretty similar. Expect his own abuse allegations in the future.

matt "finish your genocide" walsh

Fascism with soyface characteristics

When the day comes then we can say "we won fair and square, now get in the pit"

Wow, the rare actual mask off rhetoric of the western liberal.

They’d institute this policy in a heartbeat. And when the inevitable protests occurred they’d legalize running protesters over with cars and protest leaders would be black bagged left and right. This is genocidal rhetoric.

These are no doubt sincerely held beliefs, but they are definitely also engagement bait.

"Not the Indians"

Anyone else notice this very weird trait with Western 'journalists'/commentators, where they form their own opinions on others absolutely absent actually talking to them and hearing what they have to say; similar to that German woman (politician? she was on the news at some point) where she was saying that Russians aren't really European and don't value life, and have a different view towards death, or basically any Western 'journalist' who has a bizarre opinion on foreign cultures, where they don't actually invite anyone from it to confirm whether or not this is indeed part of their culture?

Why not ask the native population if they're content with the reservations or not? If this is actually about helping them, then get their opinion on it, heck, democracy right? Get them to vote on it.

Perhaps this style of journalism is actually correct but it seems clownishly unprofessional; I can't help but feel like it's little better than modern superstition, but then I'd have to actually ask journalists why they think this behavior is normal or grants accurate results if I want to be principled about it.

you cant say "matt walsh" without saying "wall"

Vile human

We know our way is superior on account of the big lights at the end

What a roach of a human being. On second thought, that's a disgrace towards roaches.

Picture perfect example of how the oppressor must give up their humanity. Master/Slave dialectic

pls

I wonder if they would say the same about the poor, mostly white towns in rural Appalachia and the rust belt