this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
100 points (94.6% liked)

politics

18645 readers
3639 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 months ago

It's a distraction from the fact that their candidate is a felon x34 (at minimum)

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

These fuckin guys, man. It'd be comical if it weren't so depressing.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

'member when conspiracies were relatively harmless like flat earthers and ufologists?

'member when the main source of Christian extremism (in the US) was the Westboro Baptist Church, and most people just laughed at them because no one really took them seriously?

What the fuck happened?

I'm actually very confused because the US 10yrs ago was radically different than the US now. How did everyone completely lose their minds? This is a semi-rhetorical question because I'm aware of some of the contributing factors, it's just... I feel like somewhere in the past 10-15yrs I slipped sideways into some kind of an alternate reality.

The most extreme Christians I knew didn't approve of homosexuality, but also weren't yelling "god hates f*gs" at people for being gay. They believed in a 7-day creation, but didn't lose their minds and thirst for blood at the sight of Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution.

The worst racists I'd met believed in white supremacy, but weren't cruising around looking for POC to lynch (with the exception of cops, that is). They hated Hispanic people, but mostly kept it to themselves.

Maybe I was just really sheltered, but while it seems like our level of tolerance has grown, the extremes have gotten worse. Like, the graph of tolerance is still going up, but the data point distribution is getting worse.

Edit: to put it another way, my experience growing up in Texas' suburbs was that people were "tolerant" in a "I don't like you but I won't bother you so long as you don't bother me" kinda way. Not ideal, but not terrible either. Now though, it's more "I don't like you and that bothers me, so I'm gonna bother you".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Those people don't feel threatened by the groups they dislike when those groups are suppressed sufficiently to not cross into the mainstream. Pride used to be a San Francisco thing, Hispanics and other various 'Brown people' stayed in their own parts of towns, etc. As those groups make further inroads into 'mainstream' the groups who used tho think they were the majority, the racists and homophobes, etc, (or, maybe were the majority if you look back far enough) who saw those groups as an inconvenience now see them as an active threat and are responding accordingly, lashing out at any soft target that presents itself.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Action, reaction

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It didn't start suddenly, you just only became aware of it recently. Which is fine, no one was born knowing any of this. This has been happening for decades, and Regan was the first real idiot president, but Nixon also helped start this bullshit train. They've always been like this, Republican radio has been at Alex Jones fever of blatant hate speech for a LONG ass time. It's like fox news on... whatever drug makes you a worse racist asshole calling for a race war. Meth. I think it's meth.

Anyway.

It's always been here, we're just clearly getting very close to a breaking point.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

They could smoke in the back of a convertible driving through downtown Dallas if they really need a spot.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Thought this was The Onion.

(checks URL)

Nope.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can’t they do that at the Capitol Hill Club?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I really don't see any rules or laws stopping them, as they all appear to be immune to the legal system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I bet Clinton has a few cigars he could offer them.