this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
197 points (100.0% liked)

news

23555 readers
725 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 142 points 4 months ago (6 children)

So, this means Biden could totally just order Trump killed right now and it'd be 100% legal.

[–] [email protected] 107 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Supreme court Justices also....just sayin.

[–] [email protected] 90 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Using "I was going to vote for Joe Biden after the immunity ruling, but he refuses to blow up the SC Justices before they overturn gay marriage so I won't" as a reason now lmao

[–] [email protected] 68 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

They literally have no excuses anymore. Everything that democratic voters insist that their guy wanted to do but couldn't is 100% doable now. With the power of legal assasination given to the presidency, all that shit would now be possible. That dems won't do it is proof of their lack of interest or conviction in their stated goals

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I encourage Joe Biden to gather all the right wing state governors and every single Republican he can for a grand July 4th celebration with an announcement. Tell them he wants to discuss something with immigration and funding from the federal government... that'll probably get them to show up. Just a big ol' freedom BBQ in and around the Capitol building.

And then he can do the funniest thing in history

[–] [email protected] 48 points 4 months ago

partiotism fund yourself and fund everyone around you

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 103 points 4 months ago

The fact that SCOTUS did this knowing the democrats won't actually take advantage of this golden opportunuty to consolidate power really says it all

[–] [email protected] 71 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Oh no that would be bad and wrong, he'd have to put Trump on an international terrorism list first, THEN he could do what Obama did and murder Trump and his children with a drone strike

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 111 points 4 months ago (4 children)

giving the biden regime the green light to merc trump legally, but they’d rather give him a second term

[–] [email protected] 78 points 4 months ago (2 children)

if he's as bad as they say he is, it's their moral imperative to k*ll him. It's like how you have to off hitler if you have a time machine.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 4 months ago (4 children)

a MORAL IMPERATIVE to KILL someone? Um sweaty killing is always IMMORAL.

Unless the target is brown us-foreign-policy

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I wouldn't vote for Biden just because he droned Trump, but I would laugh very hard so I think he should do it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 106 points 4 months ago (5 children)

It’s very hard for me to square that idea that trump is an existential threat who must be stopped by any means necessary, and the notion that Biden is allowed to do anything legally.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Obama murdered a 16-year-old who wasn't even accused of a crime and got away with it, but I guess the rules are different when the victim is Muslim

[–] [email protected] 50 points 4 months ago

once again, us-foreign-policy

Death to America

[–] [email protected] 58 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I tried to explain this to libs back in 2018ish. If Trump is a fascist, why would voting him out do anything? Ya'll are either being hyperbolic, or you're being cowards.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (8 children)

Trump is a fascist, but that is because everyone in the U.S. government follows the logic of fascism, because neoliberalism is just fascism without the campy outfits. He just not a systemic-ending fascist.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 4 months ago (4 children)

If Biden gets Trump assassinated by the CIA will it be considered official business?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 95 points 4 months ago

This is why you all need to vote. If we had blue judges in the Supreme Court this would have never happened. As long as you vote we will have democracy back in about 300 years.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 4 months ago (7 children)

My liberal coworkers are coping by "well that's fine because unofficial acts can still be prosecuted"

[–] [email protected] 60 points 4 months ago

I could love to live with this level of delusion

[–] [email protected] 49 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah I've seen the same take.

Are they really stupid enough to think that Trump (and future Republicans) wouldn't just label everything an official act as a direct consequence?

Edit: I mean he could quite literally go on 5th Avenue now if reelected, declare "I, PRESIDENT TRUMP, AM OFFICIALLY BLOWING IT OUT YOUR ASS" and gun someone down.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 82 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I would like to remind everyone that per the scotus the extrajudicial murder of us citizens accused of terrorism is a "political question" not subject to review by the courts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I know they won't do it, but if Dems had any guts they would just explicitly challenge Marbury v. Madison, and just start ignoring Supreme Court decisions. You know the right wingers would do exactly that if they were in a similar predicament with a 6-3 liberal majority court.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 4 months ago (1 children)

the SC completely invented their power from whole cloth and (almost) every subsequent administration has just gone with it

Democracy

[–] [email protected] 49 points 4 months ago

People think that I'm crazy when I say the supreme Court is basically a toddler that adults are pretending has magical powers to not make them cry. It's maddening, ignore the toddler!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (30 children)

Joker pill is officially outdated, it's time for the Mad Max pill.

What are your wastelander nicknames gonna be?

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] [email protected] 78 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Nobody saw this coming

Edit: sleepy Joe should use this precedent to Merc the court

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I feel morally obligated to vote for whichever third party candidate says they'll take advantage of presidential immunity and drone strike wall street.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 4 months ago

Remember when "if the president does it, it's not illegal" was shocking?

[–] [email protected] 69 points 4 months ago (3 children)

this is actually even more sweeping. the decision gives immunity to all exercises of constitutional authority, not just official acts.

elmofire

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 4 months ago

"Do you want a revolution or do you want results?"

The results:

[–] [email protected] 67 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Literally why should the President pay attention to anything the Supreme Court says, then?

Like, why not just say that everything regulatory agencies do also constitutes an official act by the President, so WHOOPS! There goes your dismantling of Chevron, John Roberts. Regulations aren't reviewable by any court now. Fuck you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Rip the mask off, we are in a fascist state; The elites want fascism. Let's go baby arm up, run guns, sabotage. Die for the revolution, or live in tyranny in a dying and warming world. THERE'S NOTHING TO LOSE.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 4 months ago (2 children)

we are in a fascist state; The elites want fascism.

astronaut-2 astronaut-1

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 4 months ago

So that gives Biden free range to do literally anything, which he won't

[–] [email protected] 62 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I can practically hear the panic of every AP US Government teacher dreading the "Separation of Powers" section and the inevitability of one kid asking a question about this court case.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 4 months ago (1 children)

smuglord I'd like to see old cheeto wriggle his way out of this one

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Is this the only job where no matter what you do it can't be a crime?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 4 months ago (3 children)

nah, scotus gave themselves similar immunity lmao

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 52 points 4 months ago

American Democracy™ in action

the best money can buy

[–] [email protected] 52 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Also what the actual fuck do they think "project 2025" is if not total control of the scotus by the gop?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 4 months ago

"I could shoot a child in Gaza and not lose any votes" - Biden, Trump, and most other people in the federal government

[–] [email protected] 48 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha

Please just blow up the United States already. there’s no coming back from this one

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 months ago

Sorry guys we asked the Parliamentarian and they said "no" so we can't have democracy. Better luck next time.

load more comments
view more: next ›