33
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

WHAT PART DO THEY NOT UNDERSTAND: There's no changing the nominee at this point because they can't be put on the ballots in multiple states. Stop the bullshit.

The only reason this is even a question is that liberals are willing to consider the age problem; with Trump you have the age problem, the fascism problem (proj 2025), the insanity problem (shark batteries), the sex offender problem, and so, so, so many others.

Get it together.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-joe-biden-presidential-race-replacing-biden-georgia-nevada-wisconsin-1919531

NEVADA GEORGIA WISCONSIN

Come on you cowards, don't just downvote, tell me how losing ALL of those states is anything but an automatic loss?

[-] [email protected] 65 points 1 week ago

Idk. America is still pretty racist and even more sexist.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Sexist enough that a woman who no one likes won the popular vote in 2016. ....

[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Popular vote dont get you shit here.

She lost the race in swing states where "independents" choose the winner. If she had been "John Clinton," with every single bit of the politcal baggage and none of the sexist baggage, I guarantee she would have cleared that 80k vote hurdle in those 3 states.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

She lost swing states because she decided she didn't need to campaign there.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Joe would have won that election, let alone Bernie. It would have been a different world today

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I remember the conservatives I worked with hated H. Clinton for "wanting to take our guns away." I told her (it was a white 20 year old girl I was talking to specifically in this group) that whole idea is untrue.

Clinton didn't lose because of her horrible treatment of Africans, her philosophy that abortion should be a states' right issue, because she is a woman, etc. She lost because the "Dems want our guns" propaganda. Conservatives are a simple breed.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago

Whatever we're doing, we need to do it fast and commit to it.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

RN, Biden is still the best odds at beating Trump by the sheer fact that he's the incumbent. Why do you think all of the rightmost Dems and the Russian shills are hopping aboard the replacement train? Because they want Trump to win.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah, unfortunately, there's a calculus here that isn't entirely clear. The right-wing, the accelerationists, and the Russian shills are all on board with this because they THINK it's a losing proposition for the Democrats. However, whether it is ACTUALLY a losing proposition is... uncertain.

We live in a fucked-up political era. I think a replacement could go either way. I'm not thrilled about the idea, but we're rolling the dice either way, so I'm not going to let either outcome change my disposition much. What I know is that I'm voting against fascism this November, and anyone who expresses doubts as to whether THEY'RE voting against fascism are, at best, useful idiots for fascism, and at worst, fascists who are too cowardly to admit it.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago

Oh please no. Not more establishment bullshit.

Find somebody young and energetic to bring some fresh ideas and new energy. A young Bernie Sanders type. They will mop the floor with Trump.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

We're getting establishment bullshit no matter what. May as well have establishment bullshit that can beat Trump.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But just passively accepting the establishment bullshit while not even voicing displeasure is a recipe for more and more severe establishment bullshit.

If the billionaire fucks are shoving turds into our throats while calling those smelly turds "brownies," at least they need to hear us moan. We don't gotta dignify this bullshit with polite smiles all around.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

But just passively accepting the establishment bullshit while not even voicing displeasure

Check my comment history and tell me if that seems like an apt description of my behavior.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

Kamala Harris cannot win. I hate Trump, but Kamala Harris won’t win against Trump and shouldn’t even be Biden’s VP pick in the first place.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

CNN would love for her to run cause they know that she can't win.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

She'll never win President of Lemmy, that's for sure.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

sigh

. . . Ok.

If Whitmer’s all-in and everyone super swears she can be a charming candidate for two months, fine. I want it noted my preference is Whitmer/AOC but I appreciate the optics.

Goddammit. If it gets us a reprieve from diseased lunatics for four years, fine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

CNN is a fucking joke. They literally want the Dems to crash and burn, so take any of their "advice and opinion" with a few metric tons of salt.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

I think Gavin Newsom would do better than Kamala.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Sorry rest of the country, but we’d like to keep Big Gretch to ourselves. K Thx

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Haven't heard of her,but Gretch sounds like the stronger side of the ticket based on the thread.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

So is this the new Russian disinformation strategy? We loved on from Genocide Joe to let’s switch out. Iden?

Not going to happen, and I doubt any other candidate could do better at this point of the election cycle.

I already see our local Russian trolls spouting this bullshit.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

This attitude that any criticism of Biden is from Russian trolls is getting a little tiresome. And childish

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Biden should straight up resign and hand over power to Kamala now. That would short circuit the nomination process and completely undercut any argument that she's not up for the job if it's no longer hypothetical and she's actually just rocking it IRL.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

America is sexist as fuck. Just having a woman running for President will cost the Dems more "independents" than Biden ever will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Repeat 1968

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I'd rather see Whitmer and AOC, personally. Harris is disliked from both sides. I can't see her being an option. She has a 39% approval rating. She's even lower than Biden.

As much as I'd like to see another candidate replace Biden, it's too late in the game and Americans are generally idiots. They'll screw things up this late into the battle and Trump will win.

As much as I hate to admit it, Biden is probably the best path forward ..... Which gives me acid reflux a little bit to say, but the idea of Trump being president makes me want to jump off a bridge, so I'll take a couple antacids and hope for a better choice in 2028.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Beto couldn't even beat Ted Cruz.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

He lost to Greg Abbott too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

There's really no reason to jump to him rather than someone already in national politics, but winning a senate seat in Texas is actually harder than winning the presidency.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
33 points (60.9% liked)

politics

18138 readers
3684 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS